It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
webedoomed
reply to post by zeroBelief
Well, you did tell me to stick my opinions up my deepest orifice, for starters.
You also said I didn't have the right to them.
I was simply trying to show you where your reasoning was off, and you got angrier and angrier.
Just curious, is all.
Continue to state my opinion.edit on 10-1-2014 by webedoomed because: you're is not your!
halfoldman
On the other hand, aren't there also messages that are telling us to be more community minded?
For example, there was guy on Oprah who had been locked in a tiny bathroom cupboard as a child for years, and his message now is that people should be more aware of who is in their neighborhood, and report kids that suddenly go missing.
Doesn't a lot of abuse and criminality also occur because people just want to mind their own business?edit on 10-1-2014 by halfoldman because: (no reason given)
zeroBelief[/I]
- My rights end where yours begin, yours end where mine begin
- What I do that doesn't harm myself or others, isn't up for review by others
- I do not have the right to judge others for their actions that do not harm others
- We would all be better off if we tried to live with this credo
fractal2
reply to post by zeroBelief
"My rights end where yours begin, yours end where mine begin"
Thinking on that line of thought: I have a right to the freedom of speech. You have a right to the freedom of speech. My right to freedom of speech ends where yours starts. My thought on that is that doesn't make any sense. I could try more examples but are not principles are always supposed to work, which is what makes them principles.
"What I do that doesn't harm myself or others, isn't up for review by others"
Disagreed. What everyone does is up for review by everyone else. Review is a thought processes, and there are no thought crimes in a civilized society.
"I do not have the right to judge others for their actions that do not harm others."
Judgement has multiple meanings. If by judgement you mean a thought process that determines with someone has done something, then no I do not agree this is a good idea. If by judgement you mean outlining a mandatory punishment, then also no, because most people consent to be judged.
"We would all be better off if we tried to live with this credo"
No, we would not be better off if why tried living with that credo for the reasons I outline above.
The statements you use to describe your political philosophies, which I'd guess we generally agree on, need improvement.
Realtruth
OP,
if this is your personal credo then I say we need more people to think this way.
Self empowerment comes from changing our own world, hence it reflects on the rest of the world.
Peace,
RT
ketsuko
reply to post by MadHatter364
The unnecessary agencies like the NSA, the EPA, etc.
Alphabets ... you see?
tgidkp
the alleged virtues of this way of thinking are putting a strain on our society, evidenced by ever increasing personal isolation in bubble-wrapped digital narcissism. people judge. its what we do. it is useless to try to stop, or to punish yourself for doing so.
on the other hand, i certainly do not esteem myself so highly that i would attempt to enforce my judgments upon other people. but neither will i apologise for them or pretend that they do not exist.
lets have an example:
a kid goes out into the world dressed all in black with nappy hair and piercings and mascara, etc. usually he does not directly say so, but his behavior certainly communicates the statement, "i dont care what you think. this is who i am. screw you, you judgemental jerk." but this is a twisted mindwarp. i have only judged him according to the same criteria upon which he made the decision to present himself in such a way to society.
in other words, he has an implicit understanding that his presentation will elicit a certain response from people. and then when he senses that he is receiving that response which he has carefully crafted, he pins the blame on ME.... all the while telling himself and others that "he doesnt care what i think."
if he didnt care what i think, he wouldnt present himself that way. narcissism is defined as 'the confidence of those whom have no confidence'. here is what i say: GET OVER YOURSELF!
following the 'creed' of the OP is a swift path to a grey mire of mediocrity. we all should be less hesitant to slap the hand away that is attempting to pull us up. equally, we should remain aware of the surety of our own footing. you cannot pull someone up unless you have an acute awareness of the terrain.
most likely, you too are standing in the mud.
Sly1one
reply to post by zeroBelief
I agree completely...one that I think you should add to the list of "golden rules" would be "live and let live"
Its interesting how some value minding their own business but throw that value system out the window when they get the opportunity to try and be a hero. In terms of "saving the planet" or "saving humanity" or "saving the animals" etc...heroic endeavors to do the exact opposite of mind ones own business...
The problem with simply stating "mind ones own business" is that people interpret what exactly their business IS differently...
As you can see through some of the posts here...if you crap in the woods that could potentially be construed as someone else s business because they live on the same earth...there isn't a clear universal line here...its more like a croshay of boundaries...7 billion different boundaries roughly...
So while I agree its best to mind ones own business its not necessarily a philosophy that is interpreted or understood and applied universally.
I know people who think spying on the neighbors is their business because they share the same street...or that how they parent is their business because their kids go to the same school...
The problem with this philosophy is that it requires one to give the benefit of the doubt to complete strangers in a world ran by fear...people would rather spy and be spied on under the illusion that is makes them safer...
Lets take the "spiritually awake crowd" that have a paradoxical philosophy where by they don't judge others because they "don't know their journey" but judge to the hell-fire anyone who wan'ts a PlayStation 4 while people in Africa are starving...
While I agree completely with live and let live philosophy...the interpretation of that is skewed 7 billion different ways.
I'll end with this...
In a world rampant with fear where potential harm is perceived around every corner...everything is everyone's business...so we can conceptually be in a state where people ARE minding their own business...but the experiential outcome is the exact opposite.
Once again this all roots back to FEAR...
Maverick7
reply to post by zeroBelief
Here's a bit of a prosaic example. You go out to dinner, the other person picks up the tab. Do you have a right to tell them 'oh you're tipping too much/ too little. NO!!
Yet we all have the urge to butt in even in simple matters. It's a learning process and it's all about mastering your 'self'.