It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
ManInAsia
rs will inhibit life spreading around. There is no logical reason to assume this given different technologies, life spans and the age of the universe, but this is the new stage we've reached to throw up artificial roadblocks.edit on 10-1-2014 by ManInAsia because: (no reason given)edit on 10-1-2014 by ManInAsia because: (no reason given)
ManInAsia
reply to post by JadeStar
I can't believe you've fallen for the 'distance problem' as well.
It's not a problem on so many levels
- The enormous age of the universe and the milky way gives more than ample time for numerous life forms to spread through it , passively or actively. THEREFORE, aliens may be relatively local as opposed to travelling vast distances. Just because they are aliens doesn't mean they aren't our neighbours
- Our knowledge of life in our solar system is very poor, almost no exploration has been done of Jupiter or Saturn or Neptune or Mercury
- Our solar system is not static, rather it is moving at an extremely high rate of speed through the galaxy and up and down through the galactic plane. Therefore aliens don't have to come to us, we can go to them. Essentially the galaxy is a giant mixing pot and you can throw in rogue planets (which are extremely numerous), brown dwarfs, comets, intergalactic dust etc.
- Aliens of whatever sort don't have the lifespans we do, if they have million year lifespans, or are immortal, there is no problem to travel as long as they are moving at speeds such as half life speed etc.
- There is no reason more advanced civiliations do not command energy resources to allow them to travel at close to the speed of light. No reason at all once their technology reaches a certain level.
- Warping space is possible for the most advanced civilisations, in this case all bets are off
- Information can be transmitted at the speed of light, therefore as long as you have set up some type of quantum teleporrtation network or an advanced assembly network, you can transmit information through the nodes in the manner of a galactic intenet limited by the speed of light, this information can be used in a pure communication sense OR can be used to construct physical beings. This would be a more efficient way of getting around. You understand now, you don't need vast amounts of energy to transmit light or radio waves across the universe.
edit on 11-1-2014 by ManInAsia because: (no reason given)edit on 11-1-2014 by ManInAsia because: (no reason given)edit on 11-1-2014 by ManInAsia because: (no reason given)edit on 11-1-2014 by ManInAsia because: (no reason given)
ManInAsia
reply to post by JadeStar
I can't believe you've fallen for the 'distance problem' as well.
It's not a problem on so many levels
- The enormous age of the universe and the milky way gives more than ample time for numerous life forms to spread through it , passively or actively. THEREFORE, aliens may be relatively local as opposed to travelling vast distances. Just because they are aliens doesn't mean they aren't our neighbours
- Our knowledge of life in our solar system is very poor, almost no exploration has been done of Jupiter or Saturn or Neptune or Mercury
- Our solar system is not static, rather it is moving at an extremely high rate of speed through the galaxy and up and down through the galactic plane. Therefore aliens don't have to come to us, we can go to them. Essentially the galaxy is a giant mixing pot and you can throw in rogue planets (which are extremely numerous), brown dwarfs, comets, intergalactic dust etc.
- Aliens of whatever sort don't have the lifespans we do, if they have million year lifespans, or are immortal, there is no problem to travel as long as they are moving at speeds such as half life speed etc.
- There is no reason more advanced civiliations do not command energy resources to allow them to travel at close to the speed of light. No reason at all once their technology reaches a certain level.
- Warping space is possible for the most advanced civilisations, in this case all bets are off
- Information can be transmitted at the speed of light, therefore as long as you have set up some type of quantum teleporrtation network or an advanced assembly network, you can transmit information through the nodes in the manner of a galactic intenet limited by the speed of light, this information can be used in a pure communication sense OR can be used to construct physical beings. This would be a more efficient way of getting around. You understand now, you don't need vast amounts of energy to transmit light or radio waves across the universe.
edit on 11-1-2014 by ManInAsia because: (no reason given)edit on 11-1-2014 by ManInAsia because: (no reason given)edit on 11-1-2014 by ManInAsia because: (no reason given)edit on 11-1-2014 by ManInAsia because: (no reason given)
- The enormous age of the universe and the milky way gives more than ample time for numerous life forms to spread through it , passively or actively. THEREFORE, aliens may be relatively local as opposed to travelling vast distances. Just because they are aliens doesn't mean they aren't our neighbours
- Our solar system is not static, rather it is moving at an extremely high rate of speed through the galaxy and up and down through the galactic plane. Therefore aliens don't have to come to us, we can go to them. Essentially the galaxy is a giant mixing pot and you can throw in rogue planets (which are extremely numerous), brown dwarfs, comets, intergalactic dust etc.
- Aliens of whatever sort don't have the lifespans we do, if they have million year lifespans, or are immortal, there is no problem to travel as long as they are moving at speeds such as half life speed etc.
- There is no reason more advanced civiliations do not command energy resources to allow them to travel at close to the speed of light. No reason at all once their technology reaches a certain level.
- Warping space is possible for the most advanced civilisations, in this case all bets are off
- Information can be transmitted at the speed of light, therefore as long as you have set up some type of quantum teleporrtation network or an advanced assembly network, you can transmit information through the nodes in the manner of a galactic intenet limited by the speed of light, this information can be used in a pure communication sense OR can be used to construct physical beings. This would be a more efficient way of getting around. You understand now, you don't need vast amounts of energy to transmit light or radio waves across the universe.
dragonridr
reply to post by ManInAsia
Now about space travel you are showing a lack of understanding the reason its called relativity is its relative to the observer. Time doesnt really slow down when traveling at the speed of light you still age and to you nothing will change. Only an outside observer will see a difference. So to you if you hopped on a jet took off for a star ten light years away still takes you ten years to get there at the speed of light. Or in other words you will be ten years older however outside observers will have aged more since time for them moves faster. So to cross the distances of space still takes alot of time and though we have theories on how we could warp space to shorten those distances the amount of energy required is enormous in fact more energy than mankind has ever used in our 200000 year history.
edit on 1/11/14 by dragonridr because: (no reason given)
ManInAsia
dragonridr
reply to post by ManInAsia
Now about space travel you are showing a lack of understanding the reason its called relativity is its relative to the observer. Time doesnt really slow down when traveling at the speed of light you still age and to you nothing will change. Only an outside observer will see a difference. So to you if you hopped on a jet took off for a star ten light years away still takes you ten years to get there at the speed of light. Or in other words you will be ten years older however outside observers will have aged more since time for them moves faster. So to cross the distances of space still takes alot of time and though we have theories on how we could warp space to shorten those distances the amount of energy required is enormous in fact more energy than mankind has ever used in our 200000 year history.
edit on 1/11/14 by dragonridr because: (no reason given)
Are you deliberately trying to ignore everything I wrote? The point about relativistic effect during space travel at close to the speed of light is that they are routinely ignored. If you can get to close to the speed of light you can get to local star systems with relative ease, as you only age a few years or whatever. That's for biological beings.
You are also incorrect in your understanding of time spent at relativistic light speeds (don't worry..it's a very common problem because none of this is intuitive). If you (could) travel at the speed of light you instantly reach your destination. Space is shrunken to zero. You can thank me for the free lesson later or just do more research on this.
It's all energy related. But again the mistake that people make is to look at energy requirements in human terms. This goes back to the Type 0 and Type 1 and Type 2 civilizations. I'll leave that to you to look up instead of explaining it here.
edit on 11-1-2014 by ManInAsia because: (no reason given)
dragonridr
ManInAsia
dragonridr
reply to post by ManInAsia
Now about space travel you are showing a lack of understanding the reason its called relativity is its relative to the observer. Time doesnt really slow down when traveling at the speed of light you still age and to you nothing will change. Only an outside observer will see a difference. So to you if you hopped on a jet took off for a star ten light years away still takes you ten years to get there at the speed of light. Or in other words you will be ten years older however outside observers will have aged more since time for them moves faster. So to cross the distances of space still takes alot of time and though we have theories on how we could warp space to shorten those distances the amount of energy required is enormous in fact more energy than mankind has ever used in our 200000 year history.
edit on 1/11/14 by dragonridr because: (no reason given)
Are you deliberately trying to ignore everything I wrote? The point about relativistic effect during space travel at close to the speed of light is that they are routinely ignored. If you can get to close to the speed of light you can get to local star systems with relative ease, as you only age a few years or whatever. That's for biological beings.
You are also incorrect in your understanding of time spent at relativistic light speeds (don't worry..it's a very common problem because none of this is intuitive). If you (could) travel at the speed of light you instantly reach your destination. Space is shrunken to zero. You can thank me for the free lesson later or just do more research on this.
It's all energy related. But again the mistake that people make is to look at energy requirements in human terms. This goes back to the Type 0 and Type 1 and Type 2 civilizations. I'll leave that to you to look up instead of explaining it here.
edit on 11-1-2014 by ManInAsia because: (no reason given)
My first suggestion is you study relativity does light instantly appear anywhere? See you really dont understand relativity so let me try to explain something moving at the speed of light doesnt instantly appear at there destination. When we look at a star for example we are seeing in the past. lets say we have a star 10 light years away that means it took light ten years to reach us even though you think time for that photon was less it wasnt. That photon left that star ten years ago and it took 10 years to reach us. if we travel in a star ship at the speed of light it would take us ten years to get there. The trick of relativity is to an observer on earth 35 years would pass by the time we get there. Time is relative to the observer but to the observer it allways remains constant. Here let me give you another example a satellite in orbit Like say the 24 we use for our GPS system. In order for GPS to work we need to know the time within 20 nanoseconds. However, because the satellites are constantly moving relative to observers on the Earth, effects predicted by the Special and General theories of Relativity must be taken into account . Because on earth our clock runs a little slower we have to take relativity into account.Which means roughly we have to adjust the clocks on earth by about 38 microseconds per day.
Does time stop for the satellites no it doesnt in fact its unchanged as far as the satellite knows time keeps on ticking.This clocks are highly accurate atomic clocks using the vibrations of an atom to keep time. But to the clocks on earth those clocks seem to have lost time. However thats not possible its the same clocks counting the same vibrations. So whats going on well the clocks on the satellites are really una there not moving any faster then they did on earth. What's happening is because of their motion here on earth we see a time difference. The clocks here on earth still vibrate at the same exact speed but the space they do it in seems elongated to the clocks here on the satellite making them gain time.
This is why time is relative to the observer it doesnt stop for the observer and even moving at the speed of light a year is still a year.
i know as you said relativity confuses people but i hope this helps with your misunderstanding.Just consider this lesson free of charge just remember time never stops simple rule.
Oh and im more than aware of the amount of energy required to warp space me and a friend from college actually did some math on that he works with JPL but id be more than happy to email it to you if you like i think its still on my drive at work.edit on 1/11/14 by dragonridr because: (no reason given)
dragonridr
ManInAsia
dragonridr
reply to post by ManInAsia
Now about space travel you are showing a lack of understanding the reason its called relativity is its relative to the observer. Time doesnt really slow down when traveling at the speed of light you still age and to you nothing will change. Only an outside observer will see a difference. So to you if you hopped on a jet took off for a star ten light years away still takes you ten years to get there at the speed of light. Or in other words you will be ten years older however outside observers will have aged more since time for them moves faster. So to cross the distances of space still takes alot of time and though we have theories on how we could warp space to shorten those distances the amount of energy required is enormous in fact more energy than mankind has ever used in our 200000 year history.
edit on 1/11/14 by dragonridr because: (no reason given)
Are you deliberately trying to ignore everything I wrote? The point about relativistic effect during space travel at close to the speed of light is that they are routinely ignored. If you can get to close to the speed of light you can get to local star systems with relative ease, as you only age a few years or whatever. That's for biological beings.
You are also incorrect in your understanding of time spent at relativistic light speeds (don't worry..it's a very common problem because none of this is intuitive). If you (could) travel at the speed of light you instantly reach your destination. Space is shrunken to zero. You can thank me for the free lesson later or just do more research on this.
It's all energy related. But again the mistake that people make is to look at energy requirements in human terms. This goes back to the Type 0 and Type 1 and Type 2 civilizations. I'll leave that to you to look up instead of explaining it here.
edit on 11-1-2014 by ManInAsia because: (no reason given)
My first suggestion is you study relativity does light instantly appear anywhere? See you really dont understand relativity so let me try to explain something moving at the speed of light doesnt instantly appear at there destination. When we look at a star for example we are seeing in the past. lets say we have a star 10 light years away that means it took light ten years to reach us even though you think time for that photon was less it wasnt. That photon left that star ten years ago and it took 10 years to reach us. if we travel in a star ship at the speed of light it would take us ten years to get there. The trick of relativity is to an observer on earth 35 years would pass by the time we get there. Time is relative to the observer but to the observer it allways remains constant. Here let me give you another example a satellite in orbit Like say the 24 we use for our GPS system. In order for GPS to work we need to know the time within 20 nanoseconds. However, because the satellites are constantly moving relative to observers on the Earth, effects predicted by the Special and General theories of Relativity must be taken into account . Because on earth our clock runs a little slower we have to take relativity into account.Which means roughly we have to adjust the clocks on earth by about 38 microseconds per day.
Does time stop for the satellites no it doesnt in fact its unchanged as far as the satellite knows time keeps on ticking.This clocks are highly accurate atomic clocks using the vibrations of an atom to keep time. But to the clocks on earth those clocks seem to have lost time. However thats not possible its the same clocks counting the same vibrations. So whats going on well the clocks on the satellites are really una there not moving any faster then they did on earth. What's happening is because of their motion here on earth we see a time difference. The clocks here on earth still vibrate at the same exact speed but the space they do it in seems elongated to the clocks here on the satellite making them gain time.
This is why time is relative to the observer it doesnt stop for the observer and even moving at the speed of light a year is still a year.
i know as you said relativity confuses people but i hope this helps with your misunderstanding.Just consider this lesson free of charge just remember time never stops simple rule.
Oh and im more than aware of the amount of energy required to warp space me and a friend from college actually did some math on that he works with JPL but id be more than happy to email it to you if you like i think its still on my drive at work.edit on 1/11/14 by dragonridr because: (no reason given)
markymint
To be honest, with the amount of reality cop shows nowadays (cringe), it's unlikely there will be anything else on TV in the next decade
That said - I'm surprised the "paranormal" channels never really worked out. Maybe there is one still in America or such. But UK ones have tried and failed on several attempts. It could have been good if one had worked out for freeview or such. There are a couple of channels that show some paranormal/UFO programmes but not on any great scale.
Funny how a phenomena that thousands encounter every year is less important for broadcasting than a subject say, reality of behind the scenes of working in a laundrette - is. But this is just rant.
sparrowstail
Hi, you seem to have a vast amount of knowledge in physics and stuff. I was wondering if time and space and the physics that we know of these could not become subjective within a anti-gravitic distortion? What if our physics as we know don't adequately define anti-gravitics. Dr. Paul Laviolette PHD and systems engineer says there is more than one way to distort and manipulate gravity. Being able to create a gravity well or a positive repulsive positive gravitic effect. It seems with the new burgeoning quantum theory and chaos theory, and theoretical physics, and the nature of observational outcomes, traditional science is beginning to waiver. Or that is what it seems to me. Not trying to be snarky just genuinely curious.