Dead sea creatures cover 98 percent of ocean floor off California coast as result of Fukushima nucle

reply to post by poet1b


Then you definitely can't read.

reply to post by raymundoko


I read fine, you don't know how to post to the source of your quotes. If a blog quotes another article, then you need to find a link to the other article. It is just good technique.

In addition, your posts, and the blogs to which you link, do not address the points in the Op. As far as debunking goes, it is a poor effort.

reply to post by poet1b


Now I'm wondering if it's a more serious issue than reading...

The articles I quoted and linked are specifically about the situation the OP refers to.

reply to post by raymundoko


Naw,

You have reading comprehension problems, as well as posting problems.

The Op points out that the original story does not consider Fukushima.

This point just seems to go straight over your head.

poet1b
reply to post by raymundoko

 

Naw,

You have reading comprehension problems, as well as posting problems.

The Op points out that the original story does not consider Fukushima.

This point just seems to go straight over your head.

So the OP doesn't say...

a phenomenon that the data suggests is a direct consequence of nuclear fallout from Fukushima

Oh wait...it does. Then it links to the junk science article that makes that claim...are you in the wrong thread?

reply to post by raymundoko


sorry you don't understand the meaning of data.

Keep trying.

reply to post by poet1b


Imo. He done right,
also it is clear that he (Raymundokok)
do not invented this Statements!

The NaturalNews Article is debunked, as usual because of their low Quality,
the Hoax-Bin is the right Place!

reply to post by Human0815


Claims of successful debunk is highly exaggerated.

A quote of a quote does not work. It does not give the complete story, and if that is the best you can do, then you need to give up.

reply to post by Krazysh0t


Let's be fair though.... National Geographic belongs to Rupert Murdoch's NewsCorp... So them not mentioning Fukushima doesn't necessarily set alarm bells ringing over the OPs theory.

Chances are if NewsCorp is ignoring anything... It's relevant to whichever story you hearing at the time.


At the same time I'm sceptical of 98% of the Pacific floor.
Maybe 98% within a certain radius of the Pacific floor.

Also someone mentioned Climate Change doing this!!! All within the space of 4 months???
That's probably a scarier thought than Fukushima being the cause!!!
If so why isn't that the main headline of the 21st Century(Fox)???
My little joke at the end may actually be the answer to my own question!

Peace.