It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Flatfish
reply to post by Akragon
Personally, I think there is some truth to it.
I remember when I first saw this film and needless to say, the debunkers came crawling out of the woodwork to say it was a fake or a "mockudrama," etc... as I'm sure they will again. One of their main arguments was the fact that they used actors in the making of the film and the fact that so much of the film was animated.
When faced with all the debunker's accusations, I decided to google the names of the actual marine biologist being portrayed in the film as well as their work and publications. I don't remember his name right now, but the M.B. being portrayed by the main character in the film did actually exist and as it turns out he had created several websites in the past with the hopes of releasing this information to the public. When you try to visit any of those sites now, you are greeted by a full-page notice from the Depts. of Justice & Homeland Security informing you that the sites have been seized.
I believe that the actual marine biologists who were personally involved in the "beachings" and recovery teams were silenced by TPTB. I believe they were told to shut up about this subject and threatened about what may happen if they didn't. This is why I believe they had to use actors to get the information out.
I believe the reason for secrecy is to conceal the fact that the U.S. Navy has developed a very powerful sonar weapon, (which happens to be extremely harmful to marine mammals) as a counter-measure to high-speed cavitating torpedoes. These torpedoes reach speeds in excess of 150 mph and shy of some kind of a sonar pulse acting like a sledge hammer on the torpedo before it can reach it's target, a U.S. sub would be utterly defenseless.
But that's my own little conspiracy theory.
Unthought Known
Go ahead and delete this conspiracy from your mind. It's fake and the show actually says so. See the post above mine (1 or 2 up) that has the disclaimer which was actually broadcast at the end of the film.
"None of the individuals or entities depicted in the film are affiliated or associated with it in any way, no have approved its contents. Any similarities to actual persons living or dead are entirely coincidental. Though certain events in this film are fictional, navy sonar tests have been directly implicated in whale beachings. The bloop is a real phenomenon. There is still debate about what it may be."
Though certain events in this film are fictional,
navy sonar tests have been directly implicated in whale beachings. The bloop is a real phenomenon. There is still debate about what it may be."
Flatfish
but the M.B. being portrayed by the main character in the film did actually exist and as it turns out he had created several websites in the past with the hopes of releasing this information to the public. When you try to visit any of those sites now, you are greeted by a full-page notice from the Depts. of Justice & Homeland Security informing you that the sites have been seized.
As you can see, BELIEVEINMERMAIDS' primary name server is set to DNS1.STABLETRANSIT.COM. That name server points to RackSpace Hosting's cloud servers. That is a normal web host company and is not government owned. That means the domain name is NOT seized. It also means the seizure notice is NOT directly from the government. ALL of the other mermaid websites point to the same host too. That is normal for people who own multiple domain names but one web host.
Flatfish
Unthought Known
Go ahead and delete this conspiracy from your mind. It's fake and the show actually says so. See the post above mine (1 or 2 up) that has the disclaimer which was actually broadcast at the end of the film.
Here is the "disclaimer" from the post you referenced;
"None of the individuals or entities depicted in the film are affiliated or associated with it in any way, no have approved its contents. Any similarities to actual persons living or dead are entirely coincidental. Though certain events in this film are fictional, navy sonar tests have been directly implicated in whale beachings. The bloop is a real phenomenon. There is still debate about what it may be."
Maybe you could be so kind as to point out the part that says it's "fake."
Let's re-visit this disclaimer, shall we?
What it says is that the individuals or entities depicted, aren't associated with, nor have they given approval of, the contents of the film. What it doesn't say is that they're "fake."
Goes on to say that any similarities are coincidental. What similarities? Why would there be any if it's a total "fake?"
Or, maybe this is the part you're referring to?
Though certain events in this film are fictional,
I think any reasonable person would expect this statement to be included, especially seeing how a large portion of the film was animated. But all it really says is that "certain" events are fictional which IMO, is a far cry from an open admission of "fakery."
Then it ends like this;
navy sonar tests have been directly implicated in whale beachings. The bloop is a real phenomenon. There is still debate about what it may be."
Huh, imagine that!
Definitely an admission of "fakery" if I ever saw one.
Murgatroid
Could they be real?
Absolutely...
Several years back I heard a very reliable source mention that underwater cities are real.
Since that time I have seen enough evidence to convince me 100% without question that they do in fact exist.
My suspicion is that the two are directly related.
edit on 2-1-2014 by Murgatroid because: I felt like it..
Lostmymarbles
Lol, funny how so many say they don't exist while offerimg no proof of either. Nor has anyone cared to explain why such stories exist in so many different cultures spanning through the ages that had no contact with one another. Which in itself is another mystery as to how so many people can have the same "fake" story, guess they must have had 24/7 news and the internet back then .
Odd how so many creatures thought to be fake and myths over the ages actually turned out to be real. Instead of learning from this, it seems that once an "imaginary" are found, people just tend to forget and find something elsd to call fake.
BTW I'm not talking about the videos but the idea of such a creature existing. Anything is possible.
It's no wonder this place is lacking worthwhile content and reputable posters don't post as much anymore.
MmmPie
Hahahahaha...this again...
I remember when I believed in the Easter Bunny and Santa Claus.
CGI videos like all the ones in this thread and the people that buy into it are ruining ATS. It's no wonder this place is lacking worthwhile content and reputable posters don't post as much anymore.
greenday1978
Yeah. Animal planet admitted to hoaxing these. I still don't understand the reason why though. If mer-people were real I don't think they would hide their own existence from us. In face, they would probably be waging war against us for polluting their oceans.
Rosinitiate
greenday1978
Yeah. Animal planet admitted to hoaxing these. I still don't understand the reason why though. If mer-people were real I don't think they would hide their own existence from us. In face, they would probably be waging war against us for polluting their oceans.
Maybe, maybe not. I have lost large objects in a seemingly small apartment for years. Seeing how we only explored a small fraction of the earths oceans means we are searching for a small object in a seemingly humongous apartment.
They would show themselves? I doubt that...if they exist it wouldn't have been a recent development. At some time in our past there would have been some type of divergence, a split between us and them. There are caves with ancient petroglyphs that show a war between man and mermen.
They would war against us? I'd think, again if they exist, they would be the equivalent of the Sentinelese. A tribal culture with limited technology and would likely recognize they wouldn't have a fighting chance.
It could be argued that they were just imaginative, yet all other petroglyphs are of animals that are known to exist. Something to consider.edit on 6-1-2014 by Rosinitiate because: (no reason given)
greenday1978
How could they communicate or have writing? There's no light at those depths so how would they function as a community?