It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
That was just a factoid in response to Phage, as VMO/MMO, which simply means the difference between a speed expressed in knots vs. Mach #, as the operating speed limit
an EAS of 510 knots = 722 knots or Mach 1.19, at 22,000 feet, and at still higher altitude, 915 knots or Mach 1.38, at 35,000 feet, and reaching Mach 1.39 at about 38,000 ft.
Helious
NavyDoc
Asktheanimals
reply to post by spooky24
You can prove that these calls were made from the very airplanes that crashed in to the towers/pentagon/shanksville?
Where are the black boxes and cockpit voice recorders?
Why don't 2 of them have serial numbers ascribed to them in the reports?
How could they lose all of the black boxes from the planes that crashed in to the towers when every last single piece of debris was gone over several times both on site and at Fresh kills?
Maybe they didn't find them because they weren't the supposed passenger flights?
Calls from above 20,000 feet were proven impossible to make.
Can you prove the voices on the calls were authentic?
Novice pilots flying 767's like they supposedly did on 9/11 would be like any of us jumping in an Indy racer and making course speed records in the process.
Ain't gonna happen.
You can make calls above 20,000 feet. Where was it proven you could not? You can make a call 4 miles from a cell tower on land, what does altitude have to do with it?
Because cell towers in 2001 broadcasted signals horizontally not vertically and while there is some spillage in the vertical, the cell phone calls made above about 5 thousand feet have been shown without a doubt to me mathematically impossible.
Don't take my word for it though, if you have the time and attention span, try reading this for some detailed, factual insight into the matter, if you get through it all as I have, you will change your opinion of calls being made at 20k feet from cell phones. The government did.
Check it outedit on 30-12-2013 by Helious because: (no reason given)
NavyDoc
Helious
NavyDoc
Asktheanimals
reply to post by spooky24
You can prove that these calls were made from the very airplanes that crashed in to the towers/pentagon/shanksville?
Where are the black boxes and cockpit voice recorders?
Why don't 2 of them have serial numbers ascribed to them in the reports?
How could they lose all of the black boxes from the planes that crashed in to the towers when every last single piece of debris was gone over several times both on site and at Fresh kills?
Maybe they didn't find them because they weren't the supposed passenger flights?
Calls from above 20,000 feet were proven impossible to make.
Can you prove the voices on the calls were authentic?
Novice pilots flying 767's like they supposedly did on 9/11 would be like any of us jumping in an Indy racer and making course speed records in the process.
Ain't gonna happen.
You can make calls above 20,000 feet. Where was it proven you could not? You can make a call 4 miles from a cell tower on land, what does altitude have to do with it?
Because cell towers in 2001 broadcasted signals horizontally not vertically and while there is some spillage in the vertical, the cell phone calls made above about 5 thousand feet have been shown without a doubt to me mathematically impossible.
Don't take my word for it though, if you have the time and attention span, try reading this for some detailed, factual insight into the matter, if you get through it all as I have, you will change your opinion of calls being made at 20k feet from cell phones. The government did.
Check it outedit on 30-12-2013 by Helious because: (no reason given)
You use a conspiracy blog as "proof?" C'mon. I've used a cellphone as early as the late 1990's over 30,000 feet. Radio waves are much more omnidirectional than you think. Although cellphone towers are built to push the energy of the signal laterally, to overcome obstacles such as walls and hills, much less energy is needed to go up, where there are no obstructions. You don't get a sideways signal with "a little bleed-over" you get a parabola.
The statement was that the call could not have come from flight 93 because it is "impossible" for cell phone signals to reach from above 20k feet. That statement is patently false.
Agent_USA_Supporter
Bush Addresses the U.N. - tells the world no 911 discussions
Bush says Bin Laden and his terrorists did it. Therefore we can not tolerate any outrages 911 discussions. I am sure some of us remembers this speech.
"A honey pot, in intelligence jargon, is a tempting source of information or 'dangle' that is set out to lure intended victims into a trap. Ultimately the honey pot is violently and maliciously discredited so as to destroy the credibility of anything stuck to it by association." (Michael Ruppert, "Crossing the Rubicon," p. 184)
"The Big Lie"
All this was inspired by the principle - which is quite true in itself - that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying.
~ Adolf Hitler, "Mein Kampf"
No, that is not right. Phage is a stickler for definition, and so am I.
Irregardless ...
Alleged Hijackers
The team of hijackers on United Airlines Flight 175 was led by Marwan al-Shehhi (alleged flight 175 "pilot"), from the United Arab Emirates. Shehhi obtained a commercial pilot's license while training in south Florida, along with Flight 11 hijacker and plot coordinator, Mohamed Atta. The muscle hijackers on Flight 175 included Fayez Banihammad, from the UAE, and three Saudis: brothers Hamza al-Ghamdi and Ahmed al-Ghamdi, as well as Mohand al-Shehri. On August 13, 2001, Marwan al-Shehhi purchased two four-inch pocket knives from a Sports Authority store in Boynton Beach, Florida, while Banihammad bought a two-piece snap knife set at a Wal-Mart, and Hamza al-Ghamdi bought a Leatherman Wave multi-tool.
In early September 2001, the Flight 175 group of hijackers arrived in Boston from Florida. Hamza al-Ghamdi and Ahmed al-Ghamdi arrived together on September 7 and checked into the Charles Hotel in Cambridge, Massachusetts. The next day, they relocated to the Days Inn in Boston. Fayez Banihammad flew from Florida to Boston, along with Mohand al-Shehri, on September 8, and they checked into the Milner Hotel in Boston. Marwan al-Shehhi arrived in Boston on September 9 and stayed at the Milner Hotel, where he shared a room with Mohamed Atta.
United Airlines Flight 175
en.wikipedia.org...
NewAgeMan
Btw, once groundspeed is known (see radar data in post 2), to calculate airspeed, the windspeed vector would be added, which, as a light wind to the N/W would in this case increase the plane's airspeed slightly, to about 515 knots - at about 700 ft. alt. so it was over the Vd limit of 420 knots,
by about 95 knots.
edit on 30-12-2013 by NewAgeMan because: (no reason given)
InTheFlesh1980
reply to post by Phage
Phage, I really respect your scientific approach on a lot of topics. You truly are a highly intelligent individual.
But regarding specific topics, like this, your thickness is brutally evident. You are sorely lacking in the ability to evaluate probability. There are countless topics you have commented on which you entirely lack proof of your assertions, citing arguably biased sources, claiming to be a pure "scientist".
Part of being a scientist is understanding when the basis for your postulations is fraudulent (i.e. "not YOUR research", the research of those with an AGENDA). You lack this, and thus you lack true objectivity.
The official story regarding 9/11 is a mathematical impossibility. Period. There is no model of probability which can support it. Yet you perpetually interject your complete improbabilities as if they hold merit.
I will not argue the details, as they rest on the deafest of ears. Let it be known, your words here have no more merit than the next. And although you may have a wonderful grasp of the austerity of scientific methods, you are wanting much in the ability to draw conclusions from the most obvious body of evidence in conspiratorial history.
Lots of posts and stars about planets mean nothing to me, or to many others around here.
Cheers and Happy New Year! Having dinner with Al Gore?
bbracken677
*negative sound, approximated by "ehh!*
1. The speed of the aircraft that hit the WTC was officially reported as between 500mph and 560mph ground speed, calculated by the observed point to point distance covered over time.
The plane was clocked travelling at 510 knots or about 585-590MPH.
Flight 175 crashed into the southern facade of South Tower of the World Trade Center (Tower 2) at 9:03:02, traveling at approximately 590 mph (950 km/h, 264 m/s, or 513 knots)
National Transportation and Safety Board (February 7, 2002). "Radar Data Impact Speed Study" (PDF). NTSB. p. 2. Retrieved 2010-12-29.
en.wikipedia.org...
2. A Boeing 767-200 airframe is rated to .86 of Mach speed (speed of sound) at any altitude before the risk of structural failure. It as the aircraft approaches the speed of sound when the properties extreme high and low pressure areas can have destructive effects on the airframe. This figure is as with all limits set conservatively.
3. The speed of sound at approximate sea level is 761 mph on a standard day. Therefore the theoretical maximum speed the 767-200 can reach intact is, conservatively, .86 x 761mph = 654mph or approximately 100mph above the officially reported speed of AA11 or UA175.
4. The 767-200 is an aircraft that’s considered highly powered due to its requirement to function with only one engine for ETOPS - Extended-range Twin-engine Operational Performance Standards. It is capable of taking off fully loaded with only one engine.
5. The 767-200 is considered by pilots and aviation professionals to be a “slick” or “low drag” aircraft, being without bulbous construction and with highly swept 31.5 degree wings. It is well known that it is difficult to keep the 767 aircraft from over-speeding during decent; due to its low drag/high power configuration.
next...
choos
this V-G diagram is very misleading.. its been photoshopped at least once..
NewAgeMan
Btw, the graph used is not "fake" but perfectly represent the facts, found here
rgl.faa.gov...
Just go to the "TCDS" Type Certificate Data Sheet Information PDF on the left side when you get there.
bbracken677
A Boeing 767-200 airframe is rated to .86 of Mach speed (speed of sound) at any altitude before the risk of structural failure.