It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
TheWrightWing
AfterInfinity
Altering the word of God is a sin. So I guess whoever signs on is a false Christian and a heretic. That's one way to draw them out.edit on 21-12-2013 by AfterInfinity because: (no reason given)
Which is why it needs to be accurately translated from the original sources.
Conservative Bible Project
TheWrightWing
This is just a project to translate the Bible from the original texts, correcting identified and obvious leftist warping.
wildtimes
reply to post by Aleister
Thanks, found it!
Yeah, here's what they're pushing:
AfterInfinity
I'm sorry, I was under the impression that the term was "rewrite", not "translate".
TheWrightWing
wildtimes
reply to post by Aleister
Thanks, found it!
Yeah, here's what they're pushing:
Those are apparent distortions of the original Hebrew and Greek texts, the project is to correct the progressive 'interpretation' of the original words used.
This is an effort towards accuracy regarding the original source. You're not against translating word for word to English, the original text, are you?
Conservative Bible Project
wildtimes
It's more like "hysterical leftist LAUGHTER", and your invitation didn't come for a reason. But now you're here, so prepare to be shamefaced.
This is an effort towards accuracy regarding the original source. You're not against translating word for word to English, the original text, are you?
TheWrightWing
wildtimes
It's more like "hysterical leftist LAUGHTER", and your invitation didn't come for a reason. But now you're here, so prepare to be shamefaced.
When can I expect that to occur?
Any time now?
Hysterical leftist sobbing? Check.
Blatant mis-representation of the facts? Check.
Godless leftists claiming to know scripture and expressing concern for those they mock? Check.
Do not add to what I command you and do not subtract from it, but keep the commands of the Lord your God that I give you. Deuteronomy 4:2
For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book. Revelations 22:18
TheWrightWing
This is an effort towards accuracy regarding the original source. You're not against translating word for word to English, the original text, are you?
DISRAELI
From a sample I've just looked at, they're not doing anything of the kind.
They are taking the lazy route of using the Authorised Version as a model and modifying the wording;
Sample;
AV says "If any man defile God's temple, him will God destroy"- 1 Corinthians ch3 v17
That version changes "defile" to "contaminate".
But anyone who had looked at the original Greek wording would have known that "defile" and "destroy" are translating THE SAME Greek word.
The better translation is to use "destroy" in both halves of the sentence.
So you can't tell me they are even looking at the original sources.
Where the KJV is known to be deficient due to discovery of more authentic sources, exceptions can be made that use either more modern public domain translations as a baseline, or by using the original Greek or Hebrew.
Lazarus Short
I took a look at the site in question, and saw that the work is to be done by "the best of the public." Really? I think at best, that that would lead to a rather ham-fisted version of the Bible. Rewording the KJV is...well I won't call it polishing a turd, but why rework it when there are much better versions out there, such as the Young's Literal? Too many people have the mindset that the KJV, and the KJV alone, is God's Word. No, it's a translation of God's Word, and an imperfect one at that. Again, as I said a few posts back, they've made the KJV into an idol.
AngryCymraeg
reply to post by TheWrightWing
I think that you're making the mistake of assuming that Conservapedia is a serious project. It isn't, it's a joke. Andy Schlafly's so ignorant that he dismisses the theory of relativity because he thinks that it's a bit like social relativism and regards any book other than the bible as being 'liberal claptrap'. Seriously, the man's five cans short of a sixpack.
TheWrightWing
"Re-write" only appears in the breathlessly alarmed leftist OP, not on the project page itself, typical of leftist dishonesty.
TheWrightWing
AngryCymraeg
reply to post by TheWrightWing
I think that you're making the mistake of assuming that Conservapedia is a serious project. It isn't, it's a joke. Andy Schlafly's so ignorant that he dismisses the theory of relativity because he thinks that it's a bit like social relativism and regards any book other than the bible as being 'liberal claptrap'. Seriously, the man's five cans short of a sixpack.
I'm not, I don't take it serious at all, you are mistaken.
I am responding to the leftist hysteria embodied by the existence of this thread, who are apparently taking it seriously.
Hence the leftist hysteria.