It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
reply to post by old_god
[ old_god
reply to post by mlifeoutthere
You hit the nail on the head, history is a time machine for our imagination if we study it...unfortunately its hard to trust the history we have readily accessible but its still fascinating to read up about those people of the past.
One thing I have noted, people of that time retained a fair amount of morality and good character, humanity if you will, in comparison to our time and I am sure were they to see the way we are now they would wonder what went wrong and why.
You threw me with the claim that people "used to live longer." They didn't. The average lifespan in ancient times was about 28 years, where it still is in the poorest areas of Africa. If you believe Methuselah lives 1000 years, that's a religious belief that I call delusional. Believe what you want, of course.
But moreover, it is not "wrong" to think of overlapping lifetimes instead of generations. In fact, it is a fresh perspective. My grandmother lived to be 100, and her parents lived through the Civil War. The point is, it wasn't that long ago. How many kids she had at how old is really irrelevant; it's a side the issue
Ericthedoubter
reply to post by RedShirt73
Me,f'rinstance?
Edit/
I read somewhere that YOUR smartphone....yes-yours,has more computing power than everything that existed 40 years ago...all of it...added together.edit on 23-11-2013 by Ericthedoubter because: to add:I read...
RidgeWalker
Then when I was in high school, one project I did was to interview people who had lived during the great depression and document their experiences. One of those interviews I clearly remember, talking with a man who had been born in the very early 1900's, and he made the statement that, because of his employment with the railroad, he did not feel the effects of the depression as much as some who were employed in other industries.
forall2see
reply to post by mlifeoutthere
Correct me if I'm mistaken.... But wasn't the life expectancy of a person in that era close to say 35 years? In which case, anyone this man may have met from the 1600's would have happened only on very rare occasion, if at all. Also considering the fact that this his life took place during the immigration era.
Thoughts?