It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Lunette
reply to post by AliceBleachWhite
Ok, I know I don't sound very mature in my thread title, I was pretty freaking excited and NOW I regret posting at all.
It doesn't much add to credibility at all, my spazzy attack either, and I guess this is a well earned lesson.
However, I am not stupid and I know what I saw. If you saw it too, you would not even think about calling it a plane, much less a star nor a satellite.
It was like the three-star point triangle ufo people have reported seeing. THIS was a shared star sequence, it moved together it seemed, it was together.
Once I get pictures up, you may decide for yourself, but I will always know what I saw, WAS something.
However, I am not stupid and I know what I saw.
It was like the three-star point triangle ufo people have reported seeing. THIS was a shared star sequence, it moved together it seemed, it was together.
and they look swirling like snakes, bright blue and some are orange.Some weird pattern in the sky, orange lights at end, blue in middle. It is huge, and stretches out under the moon!
Lunette
reply to post by Meldionne1
I noticed. >.< Yeah, I'm an idiot, I get it.
If someone wants prove of my age and real life immaturity, then I suppose I can leave a lovely facebook link. :/
AliceBleachWhite
reply to post by Lunette
Sounds like NOSS to me.
(clicky for bigger)
Here's a video of the NOSS satellite cluster.
NOT UFOs
You, however, mighta mebbe seen something different?
I've been watching the sky all my life, and have never seen anything that couldn't be identified, and I've seen many a thing a number of untutored people might think of as 'ufo'. Nonesuch, however.
Recommendation for the future: If you don't know what it is, and you want to post a thread about it here, then, post a "Hey, peeps, what IS THIS?" Thread.
We'll then ask questions about direction, time, location, degrees above horizon, and other sorts of such.
Comparison of IFOs to UFOs by characteristics
A key study of BBSR was to statistically compare IFOs and UFOs by six characteristics: color, number of objects, shape, duration of observations, speed, and light brightness. If there were no significant differences, the two classes were probably the same, the UFOs then representing merely a failure to properly identify prosaic phenomena that could already account for the IFOs. On the other hand, if the differences were statistically significant, this would suggest IFOs and UFOs were indeed distinctly different phenomena.
In the initial results, all characteristics except brightness tested significant at less or much less than 1% (brightness was greater than 5%). By removing "astronomical" sightings from the "knowns" and redoing the test, just two categories, number and speed, were significant at less than 1%, the remainder having results between 3% and 5%. This indicated that there was a statistically significant difference between the characteristics ascribed to UFOs and IFOs, but perhaps not as significant as the initial results suggested. For two characteristics, brightness and speed, the significance actually increased with the revised test.
....
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Is it a star, planet, aircraft lights, satellite or.........a UFO? Find out here!
Lunette
reply to post by rickymouse
Thanks for being nice, a lot of people are pretty judgmental it would seem. I wouldn't make fun of someone just for getting a little over excited in their post.
Making someone feel bad for posting a thread is stupid. I'm directing this towards a certain poster who should feel ashamed, but probably doesn't have the emotional capability.
Lunette
I made it in photoshop