It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Agent_USA_Supporter
Rezlooper
reply to post by Bassago
I'm not sure about that one. No matter what you think about Bush, he had respect for the military, unlike this POTUS.
Thats why we should respect his Wars? dont forget Afghanistan isn't doing great nor is Iraq even if American forces did stay behind in both of those countries for another 87 years 100 years things wouldn't be any better but rather worse.
the source for this news is from WND, but that's because the MSM won't give us the straight up on this.
Don't worry, you'll probably get a couple dozen S&F for this, the bar isn't very high. WND is a terrible terrible source so I find it hard to comment on the motivations behind something that may or may not be happening.
Rezlooper
reply to post by Bassago
I'm not sure about that one. No matter what you think about Bush, he had respect for the military, unlike this POTUS.
theantediluvian
reply to post by Rezlooper
Don't worry, you'll probably get a couple dozen S&F for this, the bar isn't very high. WND is a terrible terrible source so I find it hard to comment on the motivations behind something that may or may not be happening. It sounds far fetched to me. Taking over an entire military by replacing officers without starting from a coup/revolution/whatever is probably not something one could undertake in the span of a US President's term (or two), even if the absence of manufactured debt crises and battles like what has been going over the PPACA.edit on 14-11-2013 by theantediluvian because: (no reason given)
SubTruth
theantediluvian
reply to post by Rezlooper
Don't worry, you'll probably get a couple dozen S&F for this, the bar isn't very high. WND is a terrible terrible source so I find it hard to comment on the motivations behind something that may or may not be happening. It sounds far fetched to me. Taking over an entire military by replacing officers without starting from a coup/revolution/whatever is probably not something one could undertake in the span of a US President's term (or two), even if the absence of manufactured debt crises and battles like what has been going over the PPACA.edit on 14-11-2013 by theantediluvian because: (no reason given)
Hitler went from being in jail for treason to ruling the country in how many years? He purged out the military and government slowly over a few years.
Readers and members if you want to see the future take a good hard look back in history.
MALBOSIA
If I was a planning for secret group bent on taking down the largest military force on the planet, it would probably go something like...
1) Install puppet to head of state.
2) Use puppet to flip over cards of military and intelligence (Osama's death, Snowden ect.)
3) Replace experienced military leaders
5) Do some revamping to nuclear first strike capabilities, shake it up a bit.
I have no Idea what I am taking about but I will say this: If America is not being gutted from the inside out right now... Ill eat my hat.
ValdoVonz
reply to post by Rezlooper
the source for this news is from WND, but that's because the MSM won't give us the straight up on this.
Don't worry, you'll probably get a couple dozen S&F for this, the bar isn't very high. WND is a terrible terrible source so I find it hard to comment on the motivations behind something that may or may not be happening.
WND IS AN EXCEPTIONAL WEBSITE and a great source of information regarding critical issues that the MSM outlets refuse to cover + WND fearlessly presents the Reality vs the Subversive Obama Lies.
.......Whistle Blower magazine and its sister website WND are two of the most comprehensive, concise and insightful sources available in exposing the transgressions of the non-citizen, racist, Marxist and sometime Muslim terrorist in the White House and his progressive co-conspirators.
edit on 15-11-2013 by ValdoVonz because: (no reason given)
SubTruth
theantediluvian
reply to post by Rezlooper
Don't worry, you'll probably get a couple dozen S&F for this, the bar isn't very high. WND is a terrible terrible source so I find it hard to comment on the motivations behind something that may or may not be happening. It sounds far fetched to me. Taking over an entire military by replacing officers without starting from a coup/revolution/whatever is probably not something one could undertake in the span of a US President's term (or two), even if the absence of manufactured debt crises and battles like what has been going over the PPACA.edit on 14-11-2013 by theantediluvian because: (no reason given)
Hitler went from being in jail for treason to ruling the country in how many years? He purged out the military and government slowly over a few years.
Readers and members if you want to see the future take a good hard look back in history.
johncarter
reply to post by Rezlooper
Trust me dude, no one cares anymore. This country is imploding in real time and ppl at the higher levels are looting it as fast as they can, so of course Obozo has to fire all high rank military. How else would his chicago mob in the WH continue this agenda of destroying the country, without the risk of a military intervention against him from pissed off four star generals?
edit on 15-11-2013 by johncarter because: (no reason given)
tkwasny
Just as 90% of the citizens refuse to engage in the PPACA, 90% of the low pay grade armed forces will refuse to follow illegal orders. Marxist narccisists do not consider the fact that each person has a conscience and adhere to its tennents before acting against it.