'Physical enjoyment' in the afterlife

arpgme
So what if you see a loving light. How do you know that's God?

Just because you were taught God is light and love you just believe it.

The problem lies in thinking that anything is not God.
It is all God. The light and the dark are not separate.

There is fear that one can choose wrong. That feeling of fear is what makes life hurt. When the fear drops away there is love and then it is obvious that it is all God.

There seems to be a wanting, a hoping, for something 'better' in the afterlife. This apparent existence is not good enough it seems.
Yet this is what there is - denying what is for something other is the suffering - it is hell.

Text Those teachings are hypocritical because although they say no marriage means no sex. Jesus was never married and had sex. God says not to kill yet blessed Cain with the prophet Enoch. To take the bible literal is a form of ignorance sorry to say not trying to get nasty. But think about it. like freemasonry it tries to trip you p with disinformation.

Almost like god is saying we choose the intelligent. Proof of this again is the story of Cain.

reply to post by 0d1n5Unh0ly6h05t


I believe you have the wrong Jesus and the wrong Enoch.

The Christ Jesus of the Greek bible had no recorded sex in any scriptures that are authentic.

The Enoch that you have reference to was the first son of Cain but was not the prophet Enoch.

The prophet Enoch who was taken by G-d was the fourth removed grandson of Seth who was the third son of Adam. There are two Enoch's referenced in the Hebrew bible. The seed of Cain and the seed of Seth. The seed of Cain is the seed of unrighteousness while the seed of Seth is the seed of righteousness. Re study and you will see that you have been taught wrong.

TextIf we limit ourselves to just the three then that would also make Jesus an angel?

Since he was also a son of God.

reply to post by usertwelve


Jesus was also the son of man. But Jesus was the begotten Son of God and not a created son of God. The difference being that He had life within Himself and was in the celestial realm as The Word of God, He was the image brought forth of God and not a procreated being of terrestrial substance while He was as The Word of God. He has now returned to His former estate as The Word of God.

reply to post by Seede

I would recommend reading through the rest of the thread. My post will have more context.