It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

NASA Scientist Admits Lithium Chemtrails! Video

page: 3
18
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 27 2013 @ 04:07 AM
link   

BO XIAN

OH REALLY?

You know that HOW?

What evidence convinced you of that?

BTW, I don't include as "evidence" intense prior inherent biases etc.


I know that chemtrails have nothing to do with NWO depopulation and USG global warming conspiracies because I have proof positive that those things do not actually exist - none of them - chemtrails or the NWO & USG gwc.

What is my proof positive?

exactly the same as the proof positive hat people have that they do exist - I imagine it to be so!

:lol



posted on Oct, 27 2013 @ 04:16 AM
link   

Biigs
Lithium, why lithium.

All i know about it is that its a metal used in battery's and as a treatment for mental patients as it helps reduce the severity and frequency of mania

Anti-panic chem spray?


Lithium, before being used in batteries, was widely used in mental health areas.

People who had psychiatric disorders regularly used to take Lithium as a sedative.

That's why Lithium IMO.

The flouride in the water and the Lithium in the air are keeping the people subdued and sedated.

Subdued and sedated people are easy to control.



posted on Oct, 27 2013 @ 04:51 AM
link   
reply to post by MysterX
 


Then maybe you can explain how a couple pounds released a couple hundred thousand feet in the air will do that.



posted on Oct, 27 2013 @ 05:37 AM
link   
reply to post by MysterX
 


So are you subdued and sedated, or do you not breathe?



posted on Oct, 27 2013 @ 06:02 AM
link   
reply to post by waynos
 





So are you subdued and sedated, or do you not breathe?



Come on now you know breathing is over rated...



posted on Oct, 27 2013 @ 07:26 AM
link   

Aloysius the Gaul

I know that chemtrails have nothing to do with NWO depopulation and USG global warming conspiracies because I have proof positive that those things do not actually exist - none of them - chemtrails or the NWO & USG gwc.

What is my proof positive?

exactly the same as the proof positive hat people have that they do exist - I imagine it to be so!


Ahhhhh . . . perhaps you are a TRUE BELIEVER in Eric Hoffer's terms. . . . a TRUE BELIEVER in a propagandized false picture of reality.

Though, I suppose some naysayers might be paid agents of the NWO . . . many are probably just terminally unaware of the realities of this century and the one before it.

EVIDENTLY

you do not believe the super powerful, super rich perpetrators

e.g:

--Winston Churchill
--J Edgar Hoover
--Paragon Historian Arnold Toynbee
--Benjamin Disraeli, First Prime Minister of the UK
--Arthur Schlesinger Jr.
--David Rockefeller

etc.

in their own words:

.
twoday.net...

Quote excerpts from various sources. Emphases added by BoX:




However . . . you'll probably be awakened far too soon, if you aren't their active and conscious supporter already.

FACTS have a way of hitting us all upside the head whether we want them too, or not.


30."From the days of Sparticus, Wieskhopf, Karl Marx, Trotsky, Rosa Luxemberg, and Emma Goldman, this world conspiracy has been steadily growing. This conspiracy played a definite recognizable role in the tragedy of the French revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the 19th century. And now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their head and have become the undisputed masters of that enormous empire." Winston Churchill, stated to the London Press, in l922.
.


22. "In March, 1915, the J.P. Morgan interests, the steel, shipbuilding, and powder interest, and their subsidiary organizations, got together 12 men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the most influential newspapers in the United States and sufficient number of them to control generally the policy of the daily press....They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the greatest papers. "An agreement was reached; the policy of the papers was bought, to be paid for by the month; an editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information regarding the questions of preparedness, militarism, financial policies, and other things of national and international nature considered vital to the interests of the purchasers." U.S. Congressman Oscar Callaway, 1917

.

18. "No one will enter the New World Order unless he or she will make a pledge to worship Lucifer. No one will enter the New Age unless he will take a Luciferian Initiation." David Spangler, Director of Planetary Initiative, United Nations

.
12. "We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries." David Rockefeller, founder of the Trilateral Commission, in an address to a meeting of The Trilateral Commission, in June, 1991.



138."The interests behind the Bush Administration, such as the CFR, the Bilderberger Group, and the Trilateral Commission - founded by Brzezinski for David Rockefeller - have prepared for and are now moving to implement open world dictatorship within the next five years. They are not fighting against terrorists. They are fighting against citizens." Dr. Johannes B. Koeppl, PhD, former German defense ministry official and advisor to former NATO Secretary-General Manfred Werner, November 6, 2001



Four years later, the foundation gave a grant to Princeton University to study the influence of radio on different groups, and Rockefeller's General Education Board funded a study of CBS's 1938 broadcast of War of the Worlds, which was written up later as a 'study in the psychology of panic.'"[36]

.



edit on Sun Oct 27 2013 by DontTreadOnMe because: quote shortened IMPORTANT: Using Content From Other Websites on ATS



posted on Oct, 27 2013 @ 07:47 AM
link   
reply to post by BO XIAN
 


Yeah, see, It might be have been feasible last century, even as late as the 80's but today? Nope.

The masses are connected nowaday, want proof? See the Arab spring uprising, governments overthrown by people organising themselves through online contact.

If the PTB had some nefarious plan, it would have happened already, probably a hundred years ago.

The more people go on about this NWO rubbish, the less likely it is to ever happen.

And also, totally unrelated to chemtrails, but I can see why people interconnect all these theories...

Chemtrails, fluoride, NWO, oh my.

What will you do when you're on your deathbed at 82 and you look back at the life wasted living in fear of the evil gubmit out to get to you, then, as you breathe in your last breath, the irony of your fears becomes all too apparent....it wasn't the government out to get me, it was myself! And I just wasted 80 years of my life in fear!!!

*Gasp-splutter-*

________________________________________________________________



posted on Oct, 27 2013 @ 07:50 AM
link   
 




 



posted on Oct, 27 2013 @ 08:19 AM
link   

boymonkey74

 




 


And the lengthy string of quotes up the page wasn't?







posted on Oct, 27 2013 @ 08:37 AM
link   
reply to post by elouina
 


Thanks for your thread but I'm curious as to why you would think a certain member in this anonymous forum could answer any questions definitively.

If you were an agency/group/company trying to insert disinformation agents into forums such as these certainly the SOP/best way to do it would be have them appear intelligent and credible on many non-controversial topics so their "OPINIONS" would be more easily believed on the controversial topics.

For example, many "popular" anonymous posters on here scoff at the ideas of ET's, yet we have had two non-anonymous experts come on here and tell us in their opinions Roswell was a legitimate ET incident. This should have been and still should be huge news for the human race, but there is obviously a concerted effort between the major institutions of our world (political, media, religious, educational) to keep this a secret.

So I would not believe the opinions of myself or any other anonymous posters on here, no matter how believable they are on other topics, and do the research and come to your own conclusions. Don't abdicate your creator-given right to reason, it is one of our most important gifts.



posted on Oct, 27 2013 @ 10:42 AM
link   

PlanetXisHERE
So I would not believe the opinions of myself or any other anonymous posters on here, no matter how believable they are on other topics, and do the research and come to your own conclusions. Don't abdicate your creator-given right to reason, it is one of our most important gifts.



Excellent advice. I wish more folks let reason be a part of their equation.



posted on Oct, 27 2013 @ 12:26 PM
link   

network dude

PlanetXisHERE
So I would not believe the opinions of myself or any other anonymous posters on here, no matter how believable they are on other topics, and do the research and come to your own conclusions. Don't abdicate your creator-given right to reason, it is one of our most important gifts.



Excellent advice. I wish more folks let reason be a part of their equation.


These threads would be a lot shorter



posted on Oct, 27 2013 @ 12:32 PM
link   
reply to post by Zaphod58
 


No, i can't.

I don't have all the data...obviously.



posted on Oct, 27 2013 @ 12:34 PM
link   
reply to post by MysterX
 


Because that's what was released. A few pounds of lithium, in the 200,000+ foot range. Far beyond where it could do anything to anyone on the ground.



posted on Oct, 27 2013 @ 12:35 PM
link   

waynos
reply to post by MysterX
 


So are you subdued and sedated, or do you not breathe?


Oh i breathe...quite regularly in fact, although i tend not to underwater, as i don't have gills.

And yeah...i feel lethargic a lot of the time, seeing as you ask.



posted on Oct, 27 2013 @ 12:44 PM
link   

Zaphod58
reply to post by MysterX
 


Because that's what was released. A few pounds of lithium, in the 200,000+ foot range. Far beyond where it could do anything to anyone on the ground.


And exactly HOW do we know it was only a few pounds, on a single occasion, at 200,000 feet?

For donkey's years, the authorities have consistently denied spraying ANYTHING from the arse end of aircraft, and here we are little by little the truth leaks out.

We have had viruses dropped upon us during the cold war, as part of biological warfare testing, the programmes went on for decades.

Chemtrailers have been questioning what they see overhead, always getting the piss taking eye rolls in response, together with firm denials...then it comes out various air force drop powdered metals and mildly radioactive chemicals as radar testing and tracking exercises...so crap is being dropped and has been dropped on the unwilling and unsuspecting public in many countries, not just the USA.

So really....tptb's 'word' about how many pounds of Lithium (or metric tonnes per year probably), how high it was released etc. can be taken with a large pinch of salt, considering they historically lie their arses off consistently about experimenting on the unsuspecting public.

If you want to believe what they tell you, go ahead...up to you mate.



posted on Oct, 27 2013 @ 12:53 PM
link   
reply to post by MysterX
 


Have you seen the rockets used? We're not talking about an Atlas V here. We're talking about a sounding rocket, that is probably not a lot longer than my truck and trailer. And it's pretty hard to miss a rocket launch, even one of those.

media.defenceindustrydaily.com...

Just how much do you think you can fit into that?



posted on Oct, 27 2013 @ 01:02 PM
link   
reply to post by Zaphod58
 


Also how many rocket launches would it take to effectively give the populace an on going dose.
Plus people on Lithium have blood tests every month to make sure the chemical is balanced with their body, also If you stop taking it you can have "manic episodes" so are people who go on holiday somewhere where they are not spraying coming back having "manic episodes"? nope.
Plus with Lithium If you smoke and quit you have to have your dosage changed because it will effect its results.
Lithium is used to treat Bi polar, it does work I have seen amazing results.
But sorry Iam not seeing how a whole populace could be given it and no one notice all the side effects.
As usual Zap you talk sense...just wish people understood more about stuff and was not so paranoid.
edit on 27-10-2013 by boymonkey74 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 27 2013 @ 01:14 PM
link   
reply to post by MysterX
 


I don't understand. This video shows how NASA was upfront about their experiment. It was a release from a rocket way above where airplanes fly. What does this have to do with chemtrails as this forum describes them?



posted on Oct, 27 2013 @ 02:14 PM
link   
Average lithium doses PER DAY to keep you in a therapeutic range are 300-1000 mg. A day. Every day.

That's God's Own lithium air drop to make sure that every populated area is fogged in to the point you inhale 300mg of friggin' air borne lithium a day.

If you're really that worried about it, get a lithium level. For $39, it's a deal if you actually are afraid of being lithium-ized by evil chemtrails.



new topics

top topics



 
18
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join