Hmmm, nice insight.
The only way you can try to predict what will happen next is to detail what has happened in the past. And don't forget the age old saying "History
tends to repeat itself."
Wouldn't be surprised at all if another Bush would run for office again, or at least blood related family member. In fact, it's bound to happen
sometime. It always helps the campaign greatly to have a well known political name, after all.
EDIT:
Now that I think about it, it seems like Obama was part of the plan as well. I'm sure he would've been the perfect person to put into office, and I
will explain.
Now, before I talk about Obama, I want to say something about George Bush (George Bush the grandson, our last president before Obama.)
I bet Grandson George Bush was a test. A test to figure out just how dumb American's are. And I'm sure everyone can say that George Bush was an idiot.
Or you could at least agree that he was incompetent. He would preach to the dumbies, and get that patriot act and "war on terror" sold like hot cakes.
And it worked. 9/11 was most likely either designed or helped carried out by our government. If that's not the case, I'm sure our politicians were
doing everything in their power to get the "terrorists" to throw the first punch, that way they can setup shop in the middle east and profit with
their criminals friends.
Haven't you noticed throughout U.S. history the Americans have always been portrayed as minding their own business, yet they "suddenly" get attacked?
It happened in WW1, WW2, Vietnam, And the war in both Iraq and Afghanistan. You can't sell a war to the masses if your the aggressors. And when power
hungry people have no enemies to pick a fight with them, they create them. And "terrorists" are an ingenious enemy to create. A terrorist isn't
someone who fights for a particular country or cause. They're simply people who are said to be people who hate freedom, and our "free" way of life
here in the U.S.A.
Hell, extremist "terrorist" groups have been funded by our government. Back in the Soviet/Afghan war, we aided the afghan fighters, and those groups
would later turn into groups we're fighting our war on terror with. Not to mention we are also supplying the Syrian rebels with aid.
Now, after Bush got done with his chapter in helping dumb down the masses, and beefing up the security state, you present a young, charismatic, black
man; Barrack Obama. His whole slogan was "Yes we can." And he heavily used the word "change."
Personally, I think Obama was mostly elected due to his skin color. And don't get it twisted and call me a racist. Because that is not the case. If
you think about it, if you had a agenda to uphold, putting the "first black president" up there and preaching "change" is a brilliant way to go about
it. You already know that Obama will get a vast majority of the vote from minorities, especially black people. And you will also get a lot of guilty
white people to vote for him to simply because he's black. And you will also have guaranteed votes from democrats, simply because their democrats. So
he had a huge edge over Romney and McCain.
And he picked up right where Bush got off to. He strengthened the patriot act, sicked the IRS on people, cried about gun control, tried talking us
into another war, caught spying on citizens, beefed up government agencies such as FEMA, TSA, DHS, even our common policemen. And you can add so much
more to that list.
Personally, I think it's clear there is no "fair" America anymore. It's all done according to a plan. There basically has always been a ruling class
of people throughout human history. Would you be that naive to believe that is impossible today?
We tend to bash on governments with dictators. That's been perfectly clear. Yet, we only have one more option than those countries do. Now let me ask
you this. How hard could it be to create two people who seem different, but who will ultimately do the same? And how hard could it be to rig that two
option election in your favor? If you got the connections and money, you can accomplish pretty much anything folks.
Well, that's just my quick observations. What say you?
edit on 26-10-2013 by Lingweenie because: (no reason given)