posted on Oct, 25 2013 @ 08:27 PM
reply to post by texasyeti
Well there you go, like I said its far from unfeasible, this kid has the right of it.
In fact whole swaths of ships cleaning up would be counterproductive. We seem to be spending millions on drones for the military, well you can take
a quarter of that money make autonomous booyes like the ones in the link or more advanced, set them in garbage areas at sea, put a guidance tracker
on them and nature the motion of the ocean/ waves and time will do the rest. With people coming out there once every few weeks or months for
maintenance and to bring all the garbage collected back. They could be like little vacuums of the sea you could even make ones that filter out the
water from oil or other hazardous chemicals even the ones that have broken down into whole other chemicals due to exposure to sea water.
In fact most of this stuff is rudimentary stuff, all you would need is a bunch of people stuck in a room for a few day to think of ways in
implementing or cleaning up the oceans, you could probably expand on that kids idea by 100 fold in a few months. Of which 5% of the profit money that
Mitsubishi thinks it will make when bluefin tuna go extinct could be used to solve our worldwide sea garbage problems. Because however, all of it
would need some sort of funding even if its not much by today's industry standards.
In all like I said this sort of stuff are usually the last ditch effort of going about such things. Preventive methods have there uses, but making
sure problems dont happen in the first place and changing the whole outlook or how we do things, would be a much more efficient way of going about
things.