It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Akragon
reply to post by colbe
Your "God" said do not judge lest ye be judged...
You put yourself in the place of God by judging an entire group of people...
THAT is a mortal sin....
THAT is a mortal sin....
bigfatfurrytexan
reply to post by colbe
Wait a minute....the Old Testament....so you condone killing people for wearing mixed fabric? Because I recall a very violent God in the Old Testament. Hardly "Christian" in the area of love and forgiveness.
See...all the inconsistencies. How am I to believe in a system that doesn't believe in itself?
bigfatfurrytexan
reply to post by colbe
Wait a minute....the Old Testament....so you condone killing people for wearing mixed fabric? Because I recall a very violent God in the Old Testament. Hardly "Christian" in the area of love and forgiveness.
See...all the inconsistencies. How am I to believe in a system that doesn't believe in itself?
colbe
bigfatfurrytexan
reply to post by colbe
Wait a minute....the Old Testament....so you condone killing people for wearing mixed fabric? Because I recall a very violent God in the Old Testament. Hardly "Christian" in the area of love and forgiveness.
See...all the inconsistencies. How am I to believe in a system that doesn't believe in itself?
You're the one who is inconsistent friend. And I answered your questions about sex.
You never comment about what I post. I shared a lot more than a verse from the OT in my last reply, I commented to your denial, showing you Sodom was condemned for sodomy not just as you say, homosexual rape.
I shared already maybe you missed the post, the verses in the GOSPEL that states unrepentant sodomites are in Hell. God is not inconsistent, sodomy is a grave mortal sin, OT and NT.
JohnnyCanuck
bigfatfurrytexan
reply to post by colbe
Wait a minute....the Old Testament....so you condone killing people for wearing mixed fabric? Because I recall a very violent God in the Old Testament. Hardly "Christian" in the area of love and forgiveness.
See...all the inconsistencies. How am I to believe in a system that doesn't believe in itself?
Ahem...if I may take it from here...(seems to shut them up)
Ask Dr Laura
This letter has been circulating on the net. Reportedly the author is Kent Ashcraft.
Dear Dr. Laura,
Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God's law. I have learned a great deal from you, and I try to share that knowledge with as many people as I can. When someone tries to defend the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind him that Leviticus 18:22 clearly states it to be an abomination. End of debate. I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some of the specific laws and how to best follow them.
When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord (Lev. 1:9). The problem is my neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. How should I deal with this?
I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as it suggests in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her?
I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of menstrual uncleanliness (Lev. 15:19-24). The problem is, how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offense.
Lev. 25:44 states that I may buy slaves from the nations that are around us. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans but not Canadians. Can you clarify?
I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself?
A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an abomination (Lev. 10:10), it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality. I don't agree. Can you settle this?
Lev. 20:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle room here?
I know you have studied these things extensively, so I am confident you can help. Thank you again for reminding us that God's word is eternal and unchanging. linkedit on 7-10-2013 by JohnnyCanuck because: ...just because, eh?
On a side note....have you noticed that the pope even says about gays, "Who am I to judge?"
fr33kSh0w2012
reply to post by bigfatfurrytexan
So one of your parents were MENTALLY ILL and you had to give up your early life to help them? was it your mother or your father, If you don't mind me asking?
edit on 7/10/13 by fr33kSh0w2012 because: (no reason given)
JohnnyCanuck
bigfatfurrytexan
reply to post by colbe
Wait a minute....the Old Testament....so you condone killing people for wearing mixed fabric? Because I recall a very violent God in the Old Testament. Hardly "Christian" in the area of love and forgiveness.
See...all the inconsistencies. How am I to believe in a system that doesn't believe in itself?
Ahem...if I may take it from here...(seems to shut them up)
Ask Dr Laura
This letter has been circulating on the net. Reportedly the author is Kent Ashcraft.
Dear Dr. Laura,
Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God's law. I have learned a great deal from you, and I try to share that knowledge with as many people as I can. When someone tries to defend the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind him that Leviticus 18:22 clearly states it to be an abomination. End of debate. I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some of the specific laws and how to best follow them.
When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord (Lev. 1:9). The problem is my neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. How should I deal with this?
I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as it suggests in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her?
I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of menstrual uncleanliness (Lev. 15:19-24). The problem is, how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offense.
Lev. 25:44 states that I may buy slaves from the nations that are around us. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans but not Canadians. Can you clarify?
I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself?
A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an abomination (Lev. 10:10), it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality. I don't agree. Can you settle this?
Lev. 20:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle room here?
I know you have studied these things extensively, so I am confident you can help. Thank you again for reminding us that God's word is eternal and unchanging. linkedit on 7-10-2013 by JohnnyCanuck because: ...just because, eh?
Apparently she knows more then him about what God is thinking
randyvs
reply to post by Akragon
Apparently she knows more then him about what God is thinking
I doubt that the Pope, or Colbe, or myself, can come close to what God is thinking.
Because we surely can't come close to what he knows.
randyvs
reply to post by Akragon
Apparently she knows more then him about what God is thinking
I doubt that the Pope, or Colbe, or myself, can come close to what God is thinking.
Because we surely can't come close to what he knows.
1000 years ago, it may have been done around a fire with a pipe.
With a tiny bit of research, anyone could find the truth of that matter...
bigfatfurrytexan
colbe
bigfatfurrytexan
reply to post by colbe
Wait a minute....the Old Testament....so you condone killing people for wearing mixed fabric? Because I recall a very violent God in the Old Testament. Hardly "Christian" in the area of love and forgiveness.
See...all the inconsistencies. How am I to believe in a system that doesn't believe in itself?
You're the one who is inconsistent friend. And I answered your questions about sex.
You never comment about what I post. I shared a lot more than a verse from the OT in my last reply, I commented to your denial, showing you Sodom was condemned for sodomy not just as you say, homosexual rape.
I shared already maybe you missed the post, the verses in the GOSPEL that states unrepentant sodomites are in Hell. God is not inconsistent, sodomy is a grave mortal sin, OT and NT.
My apologies....I did not comment on what I thought was irrelevant. I have stated my position on Sodom. You have stated yours. Rather than argue....I let it go.
You have to understand: i quit believing the Bible was the word of God long ago. I attended Hardin-Simmons University and attended their mandated OT and NT classes, plus the require 9hrs of chapel time. I see the cultural relevance, and see two things: an OT that was meant to keep Jews isolated and promote cultural values. In the NT I see a mixture of books written about what is supposed to be the life of Jesus.
To be fair, I value the Christian religion for what it can do for people who need such things. And I do have a belief in a deity....just my deity is utterly unconcerned with us individually (for the most part). My deity revels in existence, for the chance to observe.
So you have to understand, when you quote the bible to me, you are quoting passages I have read dozens of times at a minimum (and some, obviously, hundreds). I am familiar with your material. I just don't agree with your view.
So I am asking questions to challenge your viewpoint. Such as why that one verse in Leviticus can cause such angst, yet the adjacent verses are ignored. Or why the OT God was so angry and vengeful, while Jesus basically said, "Yeah, that is mostly bull....God loves you and forgives you." Did the omnipresent God change his mind? Or could the OT be completely unrelated to the NT, and not legitimately part of what should be "Christian belief".
On a side note....have you noticed that the pope even says about gays, "Who am I to judge?"
colbe
Go read the OP, it is a promotion of the sin of sodomy. Selling that people are born gay. The excuse. This is not true.
God makes no one homosexual.
It is a disorder.
Correct, Christ's way, the Church professes His teaching, love the sinner NOT the sin which is the vile act of sodomy.
colbe
colbe
PO, sorry, is not my "viewpoint", I shared Christ's teaching which is the same teachings as the Church. Love the sinner NOT the sin. Am I to remain quiet while people further the gay agenda falsely stating sodomy is a good thing approved by God. No!
colbe
You speak of Leviticus again but not 2 Peter 2:4-6 and Jude 5, go read them. UNREPENTANT sodomites are in Hell.
colbe
In the full quote of Pope Francis, he said the same, love the sinner, we are all sinners. You can think you are gay, have the inclination but you cannot act on it (sodomy). The Holy Father does not approve of the gay lobby.
_ _ _
Then you spoke of the gay lobby. Goodness knows! So much is written of the gay lobby. I still have not met one who will give me the identity card with “gay” . They say that they exist. I think that when one meets a person like this, one must distinguish the fact of being a gay person from the fact of doing a lobby, because not all lobbies are good. That’s bad. If a person is gay and seeks the Lord and has good will, who am I to judge him? The Catechism of the Catholic Church explains this in such a beautiful way, it says, Wait a bit, as is said and says: “these persons must not be marginalized because of this; they must be integrated in society.” The problem isn’t having this tendency, no. We must be brothers, because this is one, but there are others, others. [u]The problem is the lobbying of this tendency: lobby of the avaricious, lobby of politicians, lobby of Masons, so many lobbies. This, for me, is the more serious problem. And I thank you...
VATICAN CITY— Pope Francis said the Catholic Church must shake off an obsession with teachings on abortion, contraception and homosexuality and become more merciful or risk the collapse of its entire moral edifice "like a house of cards".
In a dramatically blunt interview with an Italian Jesuit journal, Francis said the Church had "locked itself up in small things, in small-minded rules" and should not be so prone to condemn.
Its priests should be more welcoming and not cold, dogmatic bureaucrats. The confessional, he said, "is not a torture chamber but the place in which the Lord's mercy motivates us to do better.
SOCIALLY WOUNDED In a remarkable change from his predecessor Benedict, who said homosexuality was an intrinsic disorder, Francis said that when homosexuals told him they were always condemned by the Church and felt "socially wounded", he told them "the Church does not want to do this".
He re-stated his comments first made on a plane returning from a visit to Brazil in July that he was not in a position to judge homosexuals who are of good will and in search of God.
In the interview released on Thursday, he added: "Religion has the right to express its opinion in the service of the people, but God in creation has set us free. It is not possible to interfere spiritually in the life of a person."
The Church, he said, should see itself as "a field hospital after a battle" and try to heal the larger wounds of society and not be "obsessed with the transmission of a disjointed multitude of doctrines to be imposed insistently."
Matthew 9:10-13
10 And it came to pass, as Jesus sat at meat in the house, behold, many publicans and sinners came and sat down with him and his disciples.
11 And when the Pharisees saw it, they said unto his disciples, Why eateth your Master with publicans and sinners?
12 But when Jesus heard that, he said unto them, They that be whole need not a physician, but they that are sick.
13 But go ye and learn what that meaneth, I will have mercy, and not sacrifice: for I am not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance