It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
xstealth
We have credit unions for banks, we need insurance unions for health insurance.
Health Insurance companies owned by the people, seems like an idea that should have been thought of way before government owned healthcare.
I know some will say, government is the people. Well yeah right, keep on dreaming.
This is going to be a disaster, and in reality health insurance is the actual problem. It's allows providers to charge more and takes our free market competition. But in another reality, because of the problem health insurance caused, then we can't go with out.edit on 4/10/13 by xstealth because: (no reason given)
BobM88
Rhetorically speaking: Why did some people ever imagine this would be a great thing? It was patently obvious from the beginning it was meant to be so broken that we'd end up in a single-payer system.
proximo
BobM88
Rhetorically speaking: Why did some people ever imagine this would be a great thing? It was patently obvious from the beginning it was meant to be so broken that we'd end up in a single-payer system.
I pray you are correct about that, cause single payer would be a huge improvement over our pre or post obamacare systems.
Unlike you I seriously doubt it though, the assumption they made it a clusterf*** on purpose assumes the Feds care about the citizens - but they don't.
proximo
I pray you are correct about that, cause single payer would be a huge improvement over our pre or post obamacare systems.
Unlike you I seriously doubt it though, the assumption they made it a clusterf*** on purpose assumes the Feds care about the citizens - but they don't.
It's a batting average that won't land the federal marketplace for Obamacare into the Healthcare Hall of Fame.
As few as 1 in 100 applications on the federal exchange contains enough information to enroll the applicant in a plan, several insurance industry sources told CNBC on Friday. Some of the problems involve how the exchange's software collects and verifies an applicant's data.
"It is extraordinary that these systems weren't ready," said Sumit Nijhawan, CEO of Infogix, which handles data integrity issues for major insurers including WellPoint and Cigna, as well as multiple Blue Cross Blue Shield affiliates.
Experts said that if Healthcare.gov's success rate doesn't improve within the next month or so, federal officials could face a situation in January in which relatively large numbers of people believe they have coverage starting that month, but whose enrollment applications are have not been processed.
"It could be public relations nightmare," said Nijhawan. Insurers have told his company that just "1 in 100" enrollment applicants being sent from the federal marketplace have provided sufficient, verified information.
links234
reply to post by Stormdancer777
Yes seriously. Why aren't millions of low income people eligible for some of those subsidies we've all been hearing about?
Because dozens of GOP governors (states rights, after all) refused to expand their Medicaid programs. Even after the federal government offered to cover 100% of the cost.
It's 'news' like this that is complete BS. I don't know the history or the financial situation of all these people. I have to take them at their word. Perfect strangers. Perfect strangers that could very well be republicans that are willing to do minimal effort to get the best deal.
The law isn't nearly as bad as the media makes it out to be. Millions of people trying to log on the first day to get health insurance? Obviously a failure that nobody wants.
TKDRL
I have a friend, single mother, bigtime obama supporter. She is now coming to grips with how great obamacare is. She works a crap factory job, and just found out that changes that came about through obamacare, has now put her 10 grand over the limit to be covered from medicaid. She is freaking out, suddenly not defending obama anymore. She has bipolar medication for herself, and ADHD medication for her daughter that is suddenly going to start costing her a few hundred more per month, and she barely makes the rent and food per month as it is.
links234
I'm still not seeing the downside.
A bunch of republicans make up stories and post on facebook. I'm glad this is newsworthy.
BayesLike
proximo
I pray you are correct about that, cause single payer would be a huge improvement over our pre or post obamacare systems.
Unlike you I seriously doubt it though, the assumption they made it a clusterf*** on purpose assumes the Feds care about the citizens - but they don't.
Dream on -- single payer won't change anything in a positive way. It certainly won't lower costs. It can't. The only way to lower cost is to reduce what is covered.
That is what has happened in every single-payer system to date that I'm aware of. It usually starts by reducing availability to high tech equipment by not purchasing more as the population grows. New tech simply isn't purchased in sufficient quantity. As basic expenses continue to rise, because the population continues to grow, the next degradation is to just let the most ill people die. Give them a pain pill and send them home -- just like Obama said in his first election.
Everyone else, those who aren't really ill, are still deluded into thinking the coverage is good. When it's their turn and they really do need it, it won't be there. I don't know of any exceptions where a single-payer system has been in place for 20 or more years. It's the way it is.