It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The group spent 5 years, and over $500,000
inquisitive1977
reply to post by Spider879
If true amazing, although I have to doubt this. Would be nice to see something published on the supposed DNA evidence. To me those videos are not convincing alone, the DNA evidence if true would be awesome.
Fapomet
reply to post by Spider879
Bigfoot is not real.
We've explored space, Mars, the moon, and the deepest part of the oceans. I think that if there was a humanoid mammal walking around with us, we'd know by now. I'm ashamed of the human race every time I hear or see someone talking about Bigfoot. How stupid do you have to be to think that some huge slow gorilla looking humanoid has evaded observation for thousands of years, esp in this new age of technology and surveillance?
Lyderdanair
Fapomet
reply to post by Spider879
Bigfoot is not real.
We've explored space, Mars, the moon, and the deepest part of the oceans. I think that if there was a humanoid mammal walking around with us, we'd know by now. I'm ashamed of the human race every time I hear or see someone talking about Bigfoot. How stupid do you have to be to think that some huge slow gorilla looking humanoid has evaded observation for thousands of years, esp in this new age of technology and surveillance?
Next time you are on a plane, look out the window when you fly over the Rockies or Sierra Nevada mountains. There's thousands of miles of nothing up there. I suppose you also think we've seen all there is to see on Mars, in the ocean and on the moon as well?
Fapomet
Lyderdanair
Fapomet
reply to post by Spider879
Bigfoot is not real.
We've explored space, Mars, the moon, and the deepest part of the oceans. I think that if there was a humanoid mammal walking around with us, we'd know by now. I'm ashamed of the human race every time I hear or see someone talking about Bigfoot. How stupid do you have to be to think that some huge slow gorilla looking humanoid has evaded observation for thousands of years, esp in this new age of technology and surveillance?
Next time you are on a plane, look out the window when you fly over the Rockies or Sierra Nevada mountains. There's thousands of miles of nothing up there. I suppose you also think we've seen all there is to see on Mars, in the ocean and on the moon as well?
I never insinuated any such thing, if you read carefully. I just said we've been to those places.
Obviously we don't know all the species alive even on our own Earth, however, a giant humanoid gorilla is not one of those unknown species. If there was a humanoid gorilla living on Mars, we would have detected it by now, hypothetically speaking of course, assuming Mars had an atmosphere, etc...I'm just saying, all it would take to prove Bigfoot exists is a DNA sample. ALL it would take is ONE HAIR, or one pile of steamy Bigfoot dung, or a dead body, a fossil, ANYTHING! And the fact that we haven't encountered or scientifically proven that any of those things exist, not one hair or fossil or dead body mind you, means that it %100 doesn't exist.
boncho
You get close enough to watch him walk around and sleep in the bushes you can't shoot him with a tranq dart?
Arnie123
jonnywhite
I LOVE the comment attached to the linked article that says "DNA evidence proves Bigfoot is blurry in real life." or something. That got me chuckling.
Is this in the same category as Jeff Meldrum, calibre-wise? According to the link, Todd R. Disotell says Dr. Melba Ketchum and the rest of em are a laughing stock and wacko. Are they?
It's not great science and it's not peer reviewed science, so it's not science, is it?
What you think? Are people like Jeff Meldrum crazy or delusional? And can Jeff Meldrum be compared to Dr. Melba Ketchum? Or are they not in the same league?edit on 3-10-2013 by jonnywhite because: (no reason given)
--
If you go to the link, you'll see an update that it has passed peer review, as far as Jan of this year.
Give this a chance, are you here on ATS to debunk? or converse with other like minded individuals on something that has fascinated us since childhood, to be able to talk about things that you normally wouldn't talk about with people not in this same circle.
Lyderdanair
Fapomet
Lyderdanair
Fapomet
reply to post by Spider879
Bigfoot is not real.
We've explored space, Mars, the moon, and the deepest part of the oceans. I think that if there was a humanoid mammal walking around with us, we'd know by now. I'm ashamed of the human race every time I hear or see someone talking about Bigfoot. How stupid do you have to be to think that some huge slow gorilla looking humanoid has evaded observation for thousands of years, esp in this new age of technology and surveillance?
Next time you are on a plane, look out the window when you fly over the Rockies or Sierra Nevada mountains. There's thousands of miles of nothing up there. I suppose you also think we've seen all there is to see on Mars, in the ocean and on the moon as well?
I never insinuated any such thing, if you read carefully. I just said we've been to those places.
Obviously we don't know all the species alive even on our own Earth, however, a giant humanoid gorilla is not one of those unknown species. If there was a humanoid gorilla living on Mars, we would have detected it by now, hypothetically speaking of course, assuming Mars had an atmosphere, etc...I'm just saying, all it would take to prove Bigfoot exists is a DNA sample. ALL it would take is ONE HAIR, or one pile of steamy Bigfoot dung, or a dead body, a fossil, ANYTHING! And the fact that we haven't encountered or scientifically proven that any of those things exist, not one hair or fossil or dead body mind you, means that it %100 doesn't exist.
But there is DNA evidence... The problem is that there is no other DNA like it to compare to. There are plenty of hair samples out there. Read the report.
I agree the video clips are fake. It's a bummer because it just damages the credibility of what would have been a fairly compelling bit of evidence.