Whatever Happened To The Anunnaki Ailens?

reply to post by vethumanbeing

Pantheon[edit]
"The majority of Sumerian deities belonged to a classification called the Anunna (“[offspring] of An”), whereas seven deities, including Enlil and Inanna, belonged to a group of “underworld judges" known as the Anunnaki (“[offspring] of An” + Ki).[citation needed] During the Third Dynasty of Ur, the Sumerian pantheon was said to include sixty times sixty (3600) deities.[10]
The main Sumerian deities are:
An: god of heaven, the firmament
Enlil: god of the air (from Lil = Air); patron deity of Nippur
Enki: god of freshwater, male fertility, and knowledge; patron deity of Eridu
Ereshkigal: goddess of the underworld, Kigal or Irkalla
Inanna: goddess of warfare, female fertility, and sexual love; matron deity of Uruk
Nammu was the primeval sea (Engur), who gave birth to An (heaven) and Ki (earth) and the first deities; eventually became known as the goddess Tiamat
Ninhursag: goddess of the earth [11]
Nanna: god of the moon; one of the patron deities of Ur [12]
Ningal: wife of Nanna [13]
Ninlil: an air goddess and wife of Enlil; one of the matron deities of Nippur; she was believed to reside in the same temple as Enlil [14]
Ninurta: god of war, agriculture, one of the Sumerian wind gods; patron deity of Girsu, and one of the patron deities of Lagash
Utu: god of the sun at the E-babbar temple [15] of Sippar"

Wikiapedia good enough for you!

Would they actually call themselves Annunaki, or was that just a Sumerian name? I mean I'm not going word origins, or roman science fancy name calling, nor did I write the oxford dictionary.

Would an advanced civilization have an over size ego, to go as far as calling themselves chosen one? I mean never mind the capability to blow up things

reply to post by Specimen


So...I'm wondering if any of yall have any issues with these names and attributions?

It would seem as though the, perhaps, entire pantheon has rather "mixed" alchemical attributions. Or, perhaps, its just misidentification and reporting, or perhaps deliberate misdirection on the part of SOA colony survivors.

In either case it does provide a nice method to derail any actual attempt to fully understand.

But then, to me most questions are already answered. These "gods" were never truly gods, just some Humans from another rock that early Terrestrials struggled to understand themselves. Hence, the lack of understanding.

As for the names used; it is entirely probable that Early Terrestrials did in face "copy" the original name(s), though, again, with misunderstanding, and copious errors.

reply to post by tanka418


No, really I just couldn't give a crap, and your guys attempt is saddening. A Pantheon is of roman, or western European origin, and not as ancient as Sumerian, so it looses that mysticism attraction, and just sounds bloody legionary .

I'm really not on this thread for a battle of wits, maybe just to troll, but upstanding intellectual debates, you sadly mistaken here.

Are these Sumerian stories going to meet with a 100% story telling of what happened, like as if it was Loki playing his old tricks on Thors, just to get Odins attention were a 110 percent accurate. Or did Zeus really bang his sister Hera?

As for Vet guy, he just upset I stepped on his prophet Zachariah. You on the other hand, need a hobby.

I understand the whole keep things on record for future generations , for better understanding, but really, I think there is limit.

I mean they could of called themselves the `Lokians, while the Watchers, could of been called Peeping toms.

I might not login tomorrow, cause they might blow me up cause I said that.

reply to post by tanka418


Also, Derail.... right... U want to buy my book too.

Really, I am done with you 2 or 3. Go prove your intelligence to some other person, that using western terms.

Btw, Pantheon is a Greek word, considering the Romans where never creative with culture.

Pantheon was not in the sacred stones tablets or texts. I get it, and sadly you guys know the definition of the word.

reply to post by Specimen


I'm not arguing your "Pantheon" notion, and might even agree with it; IF, we were actually talking about anything that could, even remotely, be considered a "god". However, that is not the case here; your "pantheon" is nothing more than a list of Sirian people (in authority) who came to earth and tried to colonize it. They had technology 8000 years ahead of yall, so...of course Terrestrials thought them "gods". You would too if you met them 8000 years ago. Today, they would just be off-world humans, with little interesting about them, including their technology.

Was it really derailing or misleading to say Pantheon, even though the word itself is not Sumerian. Even though you guys know the definition of the word.

Was it really deceiving.

Specimen
Would they actually call themselves Annunaki, or was that just a Sumerian name? I mean I'm not going word origins, or roman science fancy name calling, nor did I write the oxford dictionary.

They didn't call themselves anything since they didn't actually exist.

The term "Anunnaki" doesn't actually translate directly as the sons or offspring of An, BTW. And, since the term comes originally from Sumer, the "ki" part is a later addition.

"Anunnaki" is a Babylonian term for this pantheon. The Sumerian term was Anunna.

Harte

reply to post by Harte


My first post on thread:

"Annuaki is just a name for a pantheon of Gods, like Olympians, gods in vahalla, or a for any other almighty army in the sky. The reason why Annuaki got so popular was due to that Stitchen Guy, and the whole 2012 nibiru scenario which never happened."

So pantheon in Sumerian(sorry if my history of lost civilization is in its noobie stage right now), is Annunaki(also my spelling for them is pretty bad).

Egyptia


I think what you are referring to is part of the great 'deception'. The fallen angels along with their factions have been warring with one another as well both with their own agenda's. The ones you are referring to want us to believe that they are helping us.

The fallen have zero chance of redemption because their fall forever cast them out. They were not created in the same manner as us and in HIS Image but rather for the purpose of watching and over seeing us in abidance to The FATHER's Will and Laws.

They have no excuse for rebelling against G-d and turning from HIS Truths. G-d did not provide a provision plan for the redemption of the fallen angels/watchers. They were no longer the 'elect' angels of G-d upon their fall.

I'll drop in a small incidental here.... they refused to be born again or born from above and come to earth and exist in the way the Father had intended and thus they gave up their chance at salvation. All the souls God created in the first age have to be born again / born from above and go through this flesh cycle. That is why Jesus said, "You must be born again to enter the kingdom of God".

This is also why God commanded the Hebrews to slaughter ever man woman and child of those watchers who mated with human women. They cannot enter the kingdom, they cause trouble, and never were meant to be. Few people understand this part of history or the bible and think God is just a mean jealous guy, but those cast out ones chose their lot.

We chose ours by being born in the flesh.

Specimen
reply to post by Harte

 

My first post on thread:

"Annuaki is just a name for a pantheon of Gods, like Olympians, gods in vahalla, or a for any other almighty army in the sky. The reason why Annuaki got so popular was due to that Stitchen Guy, and the whole 2012 nibiru scenario which never happened."

So pantheon in Sumerian(sorry if my history of lost civilization is in its noobie stage right now), is Annunaki(also my spelling for them is pretty bad).

No, not really.

Anunnaki referred (in Babylon, not Sumer) to a particular group of gods. In our own use of the term "pantheon," we usually mean the entire collection of gods a culture has in their religious mythology.

For example, in Sumer, there were two such groups, the Anunna and the Igigi.

Depending on the time frame, these two groups were sometimes considered to be the same group while at other times they were seperate groups.

This is the sort of thing that happens in religion over a couple thousand years.

BTW, in the end they we ALL aspects of Marduk.

Marduk is an early example of how a single god can eventually rise to the top and be considered the sum of all of what were previously thought to be seperate gods.

The same sort of thing happened with Yahweh.

Harte

reply to post by tanka418

Nvm.

reply to post by Harte


Yea, I'm familiar with how a lot of things in today's culture is basically sampled from Babylonian. How it got sampled, and why the Hebrews took it as their own God/or Devil, is somewhat beyond me. Maybe it that left and right aspect I've been looking for.

The best example I can provide is that Sheep Herder/Farmer quality or lifestyle. Sheep can't fight back, while Goats or Ram can. Naughty or Nice really, but why they took that aspect for their culture,leaves me clueless.

Specimen
Was it really derailing or misleading to say Pantheon, even though the word itself is not Sumerian. Even though you guys know the definition of the word.

Was it really deceiving.

You are a wee bit confused,

While it was you who introduced the idea of "Pantheon" here, it Is not at all misleading, nor derailing. It is in fact quite accurate; however, that is really of no consequence.

The integrity and composition of the individuals may be far more important, especially to any discussion of these individuals. For instance, the inconsistent elemental attributions given with in this thread do not describe any sort of mythical being or creature, they describe a chaotic attempt at envisioning one of these, perhaps real, entities.

In the final analysis it becomes much more logical to think of these "gods" as real people, extraterrestrials, who were very much not understood by the Terrestrial Humans around at the time. To think of these "people" as invaders of the Earth them puts in the correct perspective, and, if we understand that they never actually left, then the whole idea of your various religions and governments begins to make sense, as they become "control mechanisms". By the way, these mechanisms necessarily evolve over time.

reply to post by Harte


Ignorance is Bliss.....aint it?

reply to post by tanka418


An advanced race of gods wanting us to gather Gold for them so they wouldn't dirty their hand, when they could of used their power of thoughts to lift mountains.

Sounds like idol worship and giving statues gold as tribute.

Study what aspect of character you wish, for you will only find hubris. Gtg.

Ancient Aliens Debunked

is as one sided as Ancient Aliens, just taking only one side - that of all being incorrect or made up for the show. I will let you know that there is enough evidence to not deny, misinterpretation of the ANnunaki does not invalidate instantly all that is said about the Ancient Astronaut Theory.

A lot of unexplained things and encounters that cannot be verified but should not be excluded either, can suggest 'some beings of any kind - extraterrestrial, dimensional, etc'.

Ancient Aliens besides speculating for a lot more things to be originating from Aliens than it should, is also entirely speaking of 'Interplanetary Aliens' which is not very objective itself - it firstly claims that there are aliens, which is not sufficient to claim for sure, secondly they are sure it is from other planets and galaxies? How about dimensions?

These are the wrong points of AA, just as wrong is claiming that all this was misinterpreted wrongly and look at that all is a lie for sure. There is enough clues that should NOT make you dismiss some possibilities around that. That is where I disagree with skeptics as well. Ancient aLIENS Debunked makes some valid claims but others are plain biased. I would not take 'AA Debunked' as the Holy book, sorry!

See why is it good to be in the middle like me? Objective, neither deny all, neither take it all as a fact.

Skyfloating
They left more than 12 000 years ago and havent updated their status since. Also, I cant find anything on their Facebook Timeline nor any Twitter Activity. They might be back though. Their first stop will not be the U.N. Building, it will be Fort Knox.

Boy, won't they be disappointed when they find out there's no gold there.

Ooops....different conspiracy theory / thread....

Well, given its now been discovered gold came to Earth from outer space, maybe they no longer need to come here? But I rather suspect the truth is that they got lost in the asteroid belt 642 years ago and could well be there a long time, if they can't find the pyramid that lines up with Earth .......

Specimen
reply to post by tanka418

 

An advanced race of gods wanting us to gather Gold for them so they wouldn't dirty their hand, when they could of used their power of thoughts to lift mountains.

Sounds like idol worship and giving statues gold as tribute.

Study what aspect of character you wish, for you will only find hubris. Gtg.

edit on 2-10-2013 by Specimen because: (no reason given)

"Advanced race of gods"? No such a thing! In fact most of terrestrial religion came from these people. You need to understand they were / are not gods! They never were, despite what they may have told you. Though they did provide your current understanding of (G)god.

I'm not studying any aspect of character, and I'm sorry, but you are making less and less logical sense.

I mean you seem to think these fools were gods? They weren't, they were just people like you and me. And at the time (8000 years ago) they had a bit of technology; about what yall have today. So of course they were thought of as Gods.

Course, another question would be; "Why would they travel 8.7ly or so just to collect a little gold? These guys are from Sirius, and I'd bet there are far better Gold reserves there than here (based on stellar neighborhood).