reply to post by Blarneystoner
I remain skeptical... too many unanswered questions. The DNA evidence is sketchy at best and a possible conflict of interest on Ketchum's part.
It seems obvious to me that David is alluding to the possibilty that the abductions he's investigating were perpetrated by "wild men" or
"bigfoot". Am I the only one who sees this? And yes... I would call being carried off by a giant ape-man an attack... geeze.
Still no reponse from David as to why the paper was only published in one journal and is that jounal's only publication. Which, btw was only founded
9 days before the paper was published. Yet, David is convinced that the conclusions drawn by Ketchum are valid.
I respect David for taking the time to come and answer questions. With that said, I think it's only normal for someone to ask the tough questions
which surround the controversial research and conclusions which are drawn.
Deny ignorance... unless you're star struck?
I can understand why so many are disturbed by the findings. The conclusions drawn by Ketchum say that these wild men or BGFTs are human/primate
hybrids originated 15,000 years ago. That seems pretty far fetched, even to a layman.
It's a shame that the paper was never properly peer reviewed and if it was, why was it rejected?
Those questions have not been answered yet.
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
All of your questions are answered on this site:
bf-field-journal.blogspot.com...
Scott puts the study into terms that everyone can understand.
Scott and I were privy to the communications between journals and Dr. Ketchum. Some journals are obviously corrupt and work within a process that is
slanted. They posed questions to her that were in the paper and blatantly obvious. The results of the study change the way the world views many
aspects of humanity. Read Scotts site, look at August and September, all of the answers are there and factual.
You can take punches at me, that's ok, but again, until you read the paper, I'm not insulted...
Dave is alluding that a bgft is abducting people, where is that fantasy coming from?
Please, lets be grounded in our responses.....
I've stated on this site 4X that there is NOWHERE you can find this....nowhere have our investigators pointed a finger at bgft as a culprit. If
someone has an agenda and believes that, I won't hinder their beliefs, but please don't pull us into your justifications...
Thanks for the question.