Did Abraham ever really exist?

reply to post by Lone12

But you come to ME if you want to know something:
i certainly wont "go provide yóu substances" here.

and let you shoot them or either confirm them -

since you re Incapable of any sincere judgment about them.


Hot Air.
Thats what you are, Sir.

LOL! First of all, I'm a Ma'am.

Second of all - I'm certainly capable of sincere judgment.

As for giving me sources to read, I'm sorry, I don't recall you doing so in ANY of your posts here.
"Come to YOU" if I want something?

Listen, mate, you're not the only person on here who claims to have a handle on 'the truth'. And NONE of the members who do so have convinced me.

So - ball's in your court.
SOURCES, please, or you really are a[n arrogant] troll, and I'm ALL OUT of troll-food.

Honestly, you are probably the LAST person I would go to to 'know the truth'. Your claims are insubstantial.

"Hot air" indeed.

boymonkey74
reply to post by Lone12

 

Right back at you...come up with solid proof that he existed and Jesus...oh wait you can't.

oh.. *giggle*

..you ve No Clue as how you re Being Played..

..They.. the Entities, strong like a bulldozer
use yóu as Their little barking puppy...

sad, actually.

- yes please, show me ' some solid proof'.

- i m curious.

reply to post by wildtimes


see post to ' boymonkey'.

Kind regards,

reply to post by Lone12

..They.. the Entities, strong like a bulldozer
use yóu as Their little barking puppy...

Erm,
WHAT?
What "Entities"? You sound nervous now. Just sayin'.

see post to ' boymonkey'.

Why? You can't be bothered to reply with sources, coherent sentences, and intelligent discourse?

What a cop-out!!

I'm preparing to post some info about Sargon of Akkad...

reply to post by Lone12


Even If you were right you just showed the strength of your character by *giggling*.
Jesus would be so proud of you

Lone12

boymonkey74
reply to post by Lone12

 

Right back at you...come up with solid proof that he existed and Jesus...oh wait you can't.

oh.. *giggle*

..you ve No Clue as how you re Being Played..

..They.. the Entities, strong like a bulldozer
use yóu as Their little barking puppy...

sad, actually.

- yes please, show me ' some solid proof'.

- i m curious.

Ok, I'll bite.....

Can I have some of the information you think we should come to you for, please?

boymonkey74
reply to post by Lone12

 

Even If you were right you just showed the strength of your character by *giggling*.
Jesus would be so proud of you

honey... i do not make a fool of you.
Im not.

- i just like to get through....that , what the OP posted,
is not at all ' proven'.

- but its a Lie :
and for a REASON.

thats all.

reply to post by FlyersFan


He existed in the same way that Brutus the Trojan, who founded Britain, existed. And for the same reason.

..arent you all here on a conspiracy site ?
dont that include that you dont trúst what is told to you ?

allright -
then where is your Base ?

you can impossibly doubt EVERYthing ?

thats not why you was made..?

there has to be , at least, 1 truth ?
one, what is Benificient to you ?


...arent you on this site,
to see *which* one is benificient to you..?

in spite of all them Lies ?

reply to post by AndyMayhew

Okay ... you got me ... I had to go look that up.
Brutus of Troy - for those interested

Lone12
..arent you all here on a conspiracy site ?
dont that include that you dont trúst what is told to you ?

allright -
then where is your Base ?

you can impossibly doubt EVERYthing ?

thats not why you was made..?

there has to be , at least, 1 truth ?
one, what is Benificient to you ?


...arent you on this site,
to see *which* one is benificient to you..?

in spite of all them Lies ?

tell me ?

honestly ?

Sargon of Akkad, also known as Sargon the Great "the Great King" (Akkadian 𒈗𒁺 Šarru-kīnu, meaning "the true king" or "the king is legitimate"),[1] was a Semitic Akkadian emperor famous for his conquest of the Sumerian city-states in the 23rd and 22nd centuries BC.

See that? The 23rd and 22nd centuries BC! That's a whole bunch o' centuries ago!! (23 + 21 = 44 centuries ago)

In comparative mythology

The similarities between the Neo-Assyrian Sargon Birth Legend and other infant birth exposures in ancient literature, including Moses, Karna, and Oedipus were noted by Otto Rank in 1909.[44] The legend was also studied in detail by Brian Lewis and compared with a number of different examples of the infant birth exposure motif found in European and Asian folk tales. He discusses a possible archetype form giving particular attention to the Sargon legend and the account of the birth of Moses.[17] Joseph Campbell has also made such comparisions.

Sargon is one of the many suggestions for the identity or inspiration for the biblical Nimrod. Ewing William (1910) suggested Sargon based on his unification of the Babylonians and the Neo-Assyrian birth legend.[45] Yigal Levin (2002) suggested that Nimrod was a recollection of Sargon and of his grandson Naram-Sin, with the name "Nimrod" derived from the latter.[46]

en.wikipedia.org...-Old_Akkadian_32-0

There really is a VERY SLIM CHANCE (Slim to None, and Slim just left) - that the Moses legend (along with those of Abraham and all the others) is original, historical, or accurate.

What thinking person can still believe the tales in the Bible?????

Can NO ONE answer that?

reply to post by wildtimes

Really .. it's kinda spooky how everything eventually goes back to Summeria.
Even the Vedic and Zoroastrians ... I can see Summerian in them.
Summeria started ... something like 4000 BC.
Kind of makes you wonder if that is the very beginning, or if they got it all
from someplace prior to that and we don't know about it yet.

But Summeria seems to be 'it' ...

reply to post by Lone12


Why do you keep posting? You obviously don't have the wherewithal or knowledge to support your opinion. All I see is you claiming to know everything you believe is true and everything else is wrong without giving any sources or even an argument, only insults.

Your crass attitude speaks volumes. You're obviously out of your league here, go try somewhere else.

reply to post by Lone12

tell me ?

honestly ?

Okay, I shouldn't stoop to this, but...
with your poor command of English, I really have to wonder about your education. You claim to know so much - but show a very narrow and shallow grasp of the subject matter at hand, as well as having provided NO academic back-up for your claims...

How do you NOT find everything 'suspect'? Please?

Other than maybe the possible exceptions of a country's leader such as a king or pharaoh is it possible to prove anyone existed 4,000 to 6,000 years ago? Once you go past record keeping cultures there isn't much to go on.

wildtimes
reply to post by Lone12

 

tell me ?

honestly ?

Okay, I shouldn't stoop to this, but...
with your poor command of English, I really have to wonder about your education. You claim to know so much - but show a very narrow and shallow grasp of the subject matter at hand, as well as academic back-up for your claims...

How do you NOT find everything 'suspect'? Please?

- i m not sure my 'english' has anything to do with this..?

There are many 'jews' who dont understand their own Thorah.. - so ?

academic back-up ?

- i ve made several THREADS here,
SHOWING you - if you WANT [ but thát is the problem: you dont wánt to]
that all your dear Egyptian ancient Spells,
and your Beloved ancient sumerian tablets,
tell ONE and the SAME thing :

the destruction of Gods world - Paradise.

and THAT is why 'christianity appeared at 0 bC'
to UNDO that.


Now tell me,
oh stubborn one,

how can i make this clear into your stubborn mind......?

reply to post by Lone12


I quote

and THAT is why 'christianity appeared at 0 bC'
to UNDO that.


Oh dude thats too much

reply to post by Lone12

- i m not sure my 'english' has anything to do with this..?

It has directly to do with EDUCATION.

If you've posted 'threads' proving your points, you could at LEAST post links to them here in THIS THREAD, rather than expecting people to dig into your profile to find how you are such an expert source.

Or, not.

(I doubt you've got the gumption to do so.)

You've been here long enough to know how to format, cross-link, quote, and reference other threads/posts/sources. Don't blame ME for your 'laziness' to do so now. It just makes you look lame.

reply to post by Lone12

the destruction of Gods world - Paradise.

and THAT is why 'christianity appeared at 0 bC'
to UNDO that.

What a fine job it's done too! The Inquisitions and Crusades were are great step in the right direction for sure, and they've made the world a much better place because of it. Everything has been going uphill since Christianity, less pollution, less war, less genocides, less crime... all thanks to Jesus dying on the cross.

Hopefully you'll sense the sarcasm.