Awesome UFO footage taken over Germany.

I love the video but I have to call CGI on it straight away.

Reasons:

The Night cam vision noise is or to me looks like a repeated pattern, night cam spots are random simply because of the way it works, the video has clear patterns ie as if its an attempt at simulating night cam.

Next the amazing chances, by that I mean he spots two craft which hang around in frame and then at the same time do the classic departures, one glows and 'warps' off at high speed while the other goes invisible. Almost as if it was a show for the camera, very odd for camera shy craft.

Basically its ufologists wet dream video if I can be so crude, 2 craft looking amazing doing the things ufologists are desperate to see on camera.

Chance?

Lottery...

Also the movement looks like a spline has been used (for those in to 3D)

Personally I love it but sadly from the point of a CG creation rather than the real thing BUT if by any chance it IS real then its some very very serious tech going on.

HUGE EDIT:

Just looked at the other 'copyrighted video's on the channel for this and there's clear fakery going on and the obvious use of digital effects. The video of the two 'craft' over Reading actually uses pixelation to try and blur the craft for a second of two. Other video's show a clear trademark, someone sits and video's the sky for x mins, the forger then adds the objects afterwards, you can tell by the filming style, there's no urgency to pin point objects its all so matter of fact.

Add the clear FX being used and its a :

FAKE

Just an amateur testing his learning of skills (or lack of it) on the public, no wonder he or she has 'the rights to these video's'.

LOL, just looked at a couple more video's from that Youtube channel and they are all the same in a kind of way, camera points out, never tries to pin point, objects move in the same random way in all the video's and always stay when doing their 'dance' in frame.

All of these video's are creations from Premier and / or 3D program with a touch of art program thrown in.

100% fakes and the early ones are awful..

And LASTLY, the proof..

Edit that, missed the post in the thread that said the same thing, doh, reading too fast.

Cred to the original finder..

Oh well fully debunked...

Time to leave the hoaxer a little message..

Laser pens on a Black wall.

Combo tricopters and CGI.

Those are pretty much textbook heat signatures of a tricopter RC. You can see the heat from the CPU, the ESC's on the arms and the brushless motors on the tips. The regular video shows the single LED's they fly with. So, a little CGI on the video at the end where it zooms off, easy as pie. Just my humble opinion, but you have to call it the way it presents itself.

That's utterly ridiculous. We have all this technology and no one can even get a good video?

This is the original one:



Many people on youtube call for a CGI, not even that good.

reply to post by scrog77


I saw exactly the same thing only it was broad daylight and in front of 40+ witnesses about 12 years ago,
In Townsville Australia, in a little place called high range. I was serving in the military at the time, and apparently this story which I haven't told on ATS yet is common knowledge within the Australian Army. I think its Probably one of those TR-3B's .

Looks to me like some fluorescent objects that have been put on a pond or other body of water and their movement filmed as though they're flying when in fact they're floating on the surface of the water.

reply to post by scrog77


I don't like UFOs. They never show themselves entirely.

Skush
Looks more like someone playing around with laser pointers on the ground to me.

Are you serious? Jesus Christ, some people...

reply to post by scrog77


Seems fabricated due to the fact that the distance of the object appears to be significant. Thus, when the object accelerates at high speed the 'sound' of it whooshing off should of had a delay of at least 2 to 3 seconds and it's practically instantaneous.

xxxdonutzxxx is a known hoaxer. This also was discussed here on ATS:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

He and his "co-workers" also claim copyright to their creations and file claims at youtube against other users.

I haven't heard of UFOFilesTV before, but they liked xxxdonutzxxx's vdeos during the last days. Looks like the same co-operation as with other names before.

reply to post by signalfire


What about the audio of this video, in relation to the camera movement? In no way is this natural movement.

reply to post by ShadellacZumbrum


I know what you mean, But what do we know, can we honestly put a given sound on a race( if they DO exist ) that we don't know about? perhaps for them , they tools and devices they use could far surpass the machinery we use, thus making different noises/frequencies

The way it shoots off for me is to star trek warp 9

MarioOnTheFly
awesome video...

If it is legit...than I don't see how this can be anything other than extraterrestrials...

I wanna be kind to black ops, but I doubt we have tech that can move at such speeds.

Also, Chinese lanterns, weather balloons and ice particles...not an option here.

You forgot swamp gas. This has to be swamp gas since there are no other explanations, until then, its swamp gas.

Fake as #!

whats wrong with ats that so many people can not see that...

reply to post by rickymouse


No, they were never round to begin with, they were boomerang shaped, or wings, the idea that those were disks came from a misinterpretation, look it up on the web..

reply to post by Druid42


Aside from the somewhat brain dead analysis from some folks, like confusing the breath of the videographer (or hoaxer) with the noise when the object moves (when there isn't any), the real question is if it's CGI or not.

Your idea that whatever these things are, called UFO's in "real life," use physics in ways that are known to us (at least those of us not in theoretical propulsion) is probably erroneous. One thing agreed upon is that they probably use electro- gravitac drive, whatever that entails, but gas expulsion is not generally thought to be what makes these things go.

So we don't know if, or even why, they glow, or exchange energy, or anything really... so that doesn't help much with telling if this is another bored effects maker or a really lucky sky watcher.

That said, without access to the original data, there's not too much to go on.

(edit: but that's a problem with this video, too -it's too short, and sure feels cgi as heck, and then it's up to people with time to see if anyone else saw something weird... some actual investigation, but then it feels hoaxy, so why bother? Heh.)

But the feeling that it's too good to be true, coupled with some other dubious videos on this guy's channel make it likelier to be a fake... that said, these things DO exist, so there are probably some real videos that are labeled hoaxes because they are too good... kind of a no win game.