It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
1104light
You do know most non-Catholics in the US tend to be ex-Catholics, right?
"A person once asked me, in a provocative manner, if I approved of homosexuality. I replied with another question: “Tell me: when God looks at a gay person, does he endorse the existence of this person with love, or reject and condemn this person?”
Perhaps I can say that I am a bit astute, that I can adapt to circumstances, but it is also true that I am a bit naïve…
BayesLike
I'd like to know where any bible says there is a ban on having a Pope. Can you point out a specific passage that is translated more or less the same in all translations so we know we aren't looking at some version's translation popular within a particular sect?
BayesLike
Well, it is not my bible per se. But I have read it many times. And I'm still waiting for the quotes to support your claim that the bible denies a Pope.
I would imagine too, by the context of this statement above, that you have no clue as to what the "infallibility" of the Pope refers. Could you please enlighten me as to what you believe the infallibility refers, the subjects it covers, and how the infallibility which was referred to by Christ himself does not occur and then I'll respond with a more focused response to help clear up the misconception.
adjensen
1104light
You do know most non-Catholics in the US tend to be ex-Catholics, right?
What, are you kidding? You think that most Protestants were born Catholic?
The American people have had a long history of being anti-Catholic, good job joining up with the current generation.
edit on 20-9-2013 by adjensen because: (no reason given)
EricD
1104light
My bible is pretty explicit about not giving any man the power Catholics give the pope. You might want to read it.
You should hold on to it. I'm sure your Bible is important to you. Thanks for the offer though.
What powers does the Catholic church give the Pope that are unbiblical?
Ericedit on 19-9-2013 by EricD because: (no reason given)
1104light
BayesLike
Well, it is not my bible per se. But I have read it many times. And I'm still waiting for the quotes to support your claim that the bible denies a Pope.
Try any single verse telling you not to worship men, give men the same authority you give god, etc. They are all in there.
I would imagine too, by the context of this statement above, that you have no clue as to what the "infallibility" of the Pope refers. Could you please enlighten me as to what you believe the infallibility refers, the subjects it covers, and how the infallibility which was referred to by Christ himself does not occur and then I'll respond with a more focused response to help clear up the misconception.
Infallibility is pretty easy to look up. Catholics believe the pope is incapable of failing. That elevates him above not only all other humans but Jesus himself. Please go on. I especially cannot wait to see the bible quotes promoting a Catholic pope. I am sure you are just holding them behind your back.
EricD
1104light
Your bible explicitly repeats over and over again not to put the same faith in graven images or man that you would put in god. Explain how the "infallible" Catholic pope does not defy that in every way.
That's not how logic works. You are making the claim, so please show how Catholics put the same faith in the Pope that they put in God.
Thanks,
Eric
BobAthome
Gee were not all the APOSTLES men?
Well, it is not my bible per se. But I have read it many times. And I'm still waiting for the quotes to support your claim that the bible denies a Pope.
OK, how about I just play dumb and you tell me what the point of having a pope is and what his power is.
Deetermined
reply to post by BayesLike
Well, it is not my bible per se. But I have read it many times. And I'm still waiting for the quotes to support your claim that the bible denies a Pope.
For starters, Jesus told the disciples (as ministers of God) not to take on the titles of Rabbi, Father or Master. They should be referred to as brothers.
Given that Paul and John both referred to themselves as "Father" and/or to their followers as their "children", that's obviously not what Christ meant in saying "call no one Father" -- he wasn't banning the use of the word.