It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Nostrenominon
reply to post by sk0rpi0n
There are just way too many ideas and analogies stolen from previous religions and cultures, and jumbled up out of order into a completely new "story".
TDawgRex
reply to post by Nostrenominon
Archaeologists have found ruins by referencing the Bible. I view it a a historical summery myself. Some pretty cool stories in it as well, though some are beyond belief...which requires faith.
I find the OP's theory to be pretty decent and it does make sense. From a economic/religious viewpoint that is.
The OP's theory makes more sense to me than many other theories I heard.
UnaChispa
Nostrenominon
reply to post by sk0rpi0n
There are just way too many ideas and analogies stolen from previous religions and cultures, and jumbled up out of order into a completely new "story".
Could you name a few?
On topic, OP, that was a good read that I didn't want to end. I love the book of Revelation. Keep up the thoughtful posts.
(If I say something that is right, then God has inspired me. If I say something that is wrong, then it is my own mistake.)
Nostrenominon
just because there are some truths mixed up with mistruths in the Bible, doesn't mean everything should be taken literally.
2. What does the whore represent?
Many Christian theologians point to the idolatry and false religion of historical Babylon and arbitrarily insert religious meanings to the events and symbols of chapters 17 and 18 in the Book of Revelation. They go on to claim that the whore is some “false religion”...
Nostrenominon
I'm sure it does "TDawg". Like I said, just because there are some truths mixed up with mistruths in the Bible, doesn't mean everything should be taken literally.
Dr. Alister McGrath, Professor of Historical Theology at Oxford University, says, “Parallels between the pagan myths of dying and rising gods and the New Testament accounts of the resurrection of Jesus are now regarded as remote, to say the least...If anyone borrowed any ideas from anyone, it seems it was the gnostics who took up Christian ideas." (Intellectuals Don't Need God and Other Modern Myths, 1993, p. 121).
We do know that Mithraism, like its mystery competitors, had a basic myth. Mithra was supposedly born when he emerged from a rock; he was carrying a knife and torch and wearing a Phrygian cap. He battled first with the sun and then with a primeval bull, thought to be the first act of creation. Mithra slew the bull, which then became the ground of life for the human race. [Nash, 144]
Christianity affirms the physical death and bodily resurrection of Christ. Mithraism, like other pagan religions, has no bodily resurrection. The Greek writer Aeschylus sums up the Greek view, “When the earth has drunk up a man’s blood, once he is dead, there is no resurrection.” He uses the same Greek word for “resurrection,” anastasis, that Paul uses in 1 Corinthians 15 (Aeschylus, Eumenides, 647). Nash notes:
Allegations of an early Christian dependence on Mithraism have been rejected on many grounds. Mithraism had no concept of the death and resurrection of its god and no place for any concept of rebirth—at least during its early stages.... During the early stages of the cult, the notion of rebirth would have been foreign to its basic outlook.... Moreover, Mithraism was basically a military cult. Therefore, one must be skeptical about suggestions that it appealed to nonmilitary people like the early Christians. [ibid.]
Nothing about history can be accurately ascertained from the Bible. Sorry. There are just way too many ideas and analogies stolen from previous religions and cultures,
Why don't you ever take credit for what you get right? Geez. It's a wonder you have any self-esteem at all with an attitude like that.
I'm only going to add that I think she represents both world governments and a false religious system because we also know that she's filled with the blood of the saints and martyrs for Jesus. The saints and martyrs weren't killed due to their efforts in setting up a new government system, but a religious one. So, I'm going to say that she covers both.
Have you ever thought : just why would an atheist worship the anti-Christ? Atheists don't worship anything or anyone. So does that mean they would refrain from literally worshipping the anti-Christ.... and therefore go to heaven??? But would they vote or accept the anti-Christ?