posted on Sep, 9 2013 @ 11:52 PM
I know that a great deal of time was put in this new version, and as a developer, I know what it is like to receive non-acceptance of radical , new
design. But if I do not like something, I am not going to adapt to it , if I feel that it is not an improvement over an accepted, working design.
This new site lacks everything I grew accustomed to in the "Old" version. It specifically lacks the pizzas and the readability of what it once was.
I find it hard to navigate, uses up way too much real estate for the content provided, and has completely alienated me from a website that I spent a
great deal of time on, because it was just so easy to browse and comment quickly, in basically the same way, for the past 5 years.
No, I am not and old fart that refuses to change. I am an old fart that has a great deal of experience in this business, has written system
interfaces with comparable complexity, and yes, has suffered a number of instances of releasing what I thought to be a revolution, only to have my
constituents threaten to burn me at the stake. It is part of being a multimedia provider, and the playing field is full of mines.
Today, the game is "Never alienate your audience." It does not matter if your new version is compliant with all the new web standards, if it meets
certain "acceptable" media guidelines, or is what you may conceive as the "way" you want this site to move in to the future. The reality is that
your members and readers are going to make that decision for you, irregardless. One must simply look at what Microsoft is facing in Windows 8 to
understand it. Presently , major corporations will not even consider implementing it, because it has been basically poisoned by the users it was
designed to appeal to.
To that end, especially today, once you have established something that certainly works, and have continued in that vein for as much time as you have,
to change it this radically, without alternate recourse could be suicide for your otherwise fine product.
So, I would offer advise that if you insist on having this venue having a presence in this format, then you also allow your old (tried and proven)
format to co-exist as well. You have obviously demonstrated that you can easily jump from one to the other, in short order, so why not let your
members have the choice of having it presented to them in BOTH formats, and they get to choose which one they like. If you turn out to be correct,
that the new format is better, then through attrition, you readers will navigate to that design, once they have found that it suits their respective
needs. Otherwise, they get to experience this site the way it always was, and keep them happy. Over time, if the new format becomes preferred by an
overwhelming percentage of your members, then you may choose to eliminate the other.
Of course this is a suggestion, but it is an educated one, and one that would obviously suit the majority of people I have talked to, and listened to
regarding committing this site totally to this new format , at this stage of the evolution of ATS.
Thanks for your consideration, and I would like to add that I would not even consider posting this comment, if I did not already admire, enjoy and
respect the existing ATS as being a premium and much desired web venue.