It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
We can expect to see TEPCO dump as much rad water as possible and blame it on the Typhoon! They've been waiting for this.
"But we decided to release the water into sea as we reached a conclusion that it can be regarded as rainfall after we monitored levels of radiation," TEPCO spokesman Yo Koshimizu said.
According to the spokesman, one litre of the water contained up to 24 becquerels of strontium and other radioactive materials -- below the 30 becquerel per litre safety limit imposed by Japanese authorities for a possible release to the environment.
However, it was unknown how much water was released to sea under the "emergency measure," Koshimizu said.
www.channelnewsasia.com...
Human0815
reply to post by LittleBlackEagle
When i would measure such a high Amount i would do a deeper Screening,
maybe even contact a Laboratory for a professional Check Up,
it is not that expensive to get a Statement!
(Checks coming from low as 250$ for Soil)
intrptr
reply to post by DancedWithWolves
Just addressing one part of your post.
Does anyone know anymore about this trapping mechanism and what forces are acting on the radioactive particles that make them form into belts?
The energetic particles that ride earths magnetic field to the poles are not "radioactive particles" like the contamination from Fuku. Its a problem of definition really.
Radiation from the sun can kill you but won't contaminate you the way a particle of radioactive Plutonium can.
An X-ray or gamma ray from the sun passes thru your body (hopefully without hitting anything) and is gone. The "source" of the "ray" is indeed the sun.
On the other hand, a particle of radioactive contamination from Fuku if ingested is like swallowing a mini X-ray machine that can't be turned off. If absorbed that source sits in your bones and connective tissue and irradiates cells around it, potentially giving rise to cancer.
Thats a real short answer of the difference between the two "sources" (the Sun and Fuku).
Heres a linky...
...and a video about the short decay path "alpha" emitters exhibit. Its "techie", ignore the tools used and focus more on the strip of Americium from the smoke detector. Alpha rays travel very short distances (5 to 10 microns) but do lethal damage to body cells in that range. Some die, some mutate...
Earths electromagnetic field and radio antenna's aren't able to address thee issues of man made radioactivity down here on the planet.
What is often left out, in fact it is ALWAYS left out, is that the Sun's "radiation" is needed for our consciousness to evolve.
On 9/12/2013, NRA (Nuclear Regulation Authority) reported there is no technology to remove Tritium from the significant volume of the contaminated water.
They held the working group meeting for the contaminated water in Fukushima nuclear plant on 9/12/2013. In this meeting, they stated Tepco is expecting the multiple nuclides removing system (ALPS) to purify the contaminated water clean enough to discharge.
However, even after the treatment by ALPS, radioactive water Tritium remains in the water. The density is approx. 100,000,000,000 Bq/m3.
The working group concluded it is impossible to remove Tritium with the existing technology, they decided to appeal the world for the new technology.
It seems like Tepco confusingly announced the contamination levels of “rainwater” to be lower than actual before discharge.
Due to the Typhoon, Tepco discharged the “rainwater” retained in 7 tank areas. However, all β nuclide readings were announced to be higher than before discharge in 4 of 7 tank areas according to their announcement after the discharge. Both of the readings were based on the samples taken before the discharge, so logically they should be the same level.
The largest increase was from 2,000 Bq/m3 (announced before discharge) to 20,000 Bq/m3 (announced after discharge). The second largest increase was from 3,000 Bq/m3 (announced before discharge) to 6,000 Bq/m3 (announced before discharge).
(announced before discharge) → (announced after discharge)
2,000→20,000 Bq/m3
6,000→10,000 Bq/m3
3,000→6,000 Bq/m3
8,000→15,000 Bq/m3[
As a person who’s constantly moving, the only thing to keep me secure is being read by thousands of the readers all the time.
I’m in the very unfortified state, it’s protecting me to keep communicating with all around the world.
Even if I’m troubled somewhere or down in the room alone, almost nobody is going to realize it for a while.
It’s easier than anything to set me up, such as I was involved in some crime or accident because nobody is going to see it.
so I would like to ask my readers to worry about me if I don’t update Fukushima Diary for 2 days. If I leave no message for 3 days, please make some noise.
In that case, probably
1. I got something in my computer.
2. I got something in my server.
3. I’m in trouble.
I hope it will never happen but there’s nothing to lose to prepare an emergency plan.
Japanese officials visit Korea to demand removal of import ban
A group of nine officials from Japan's fisheries ministry visited Korea's food watchdog on Monday afternoon to discuss Korea's recent import ban on all fisheries products from Japan's radiation-hit Fukushima and seven other nearby prefectures. The officials from Japan's Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, reportedly explained to their Korean counterparts the countermeasures that have been taken against radiation leaks, and asked that the ban be lifted.
The Korean government in return asked for more detailed information on the radiation leak out of Fukushima, saying that what they've been provided thus far is not sufficient enough to determine whether imports from those regions are safe from radiation.
Japan's Chief Cabinet Secretary earlier this month tried to reassure the international community about the safety of Japanese products.
LittleBlackEagle
Human0815
reply to post by LittleBlackEagle
When i would measure such a high Amount i would do a deeper Screening,
maybe even contact a Laboratory for a professional Check Up,
it is not that expensive to get a Statement!
(Checks coming from low as 250$ for Soil)
why bother, an analysis won't make it go away, it won't stop it from poisoning my family for decades, if we last decades.
This letter is to inform you of the results of our measurements of the radioactivity levels at thirty-seven stadiums, facilities, and selected places for the 2020 Olympic Games if they are held in Tokyo. Our group, Citizen Group for Measuring Radioactive Environment of the Facilities for the 2020 Tokyo Olympics (referred hereafter as Citizen Group for Measuring Radioactive Environment) consists of approximately forty volunteers living in Tokyo or its surrounding areas.
They held the working group meeting for the contaminated water in Fukushima nuclear plant on 9/12/2013. In this meeting, they stated Tepco is expecting the multiple nuclides removing system (ALPS) to purify the contaminated water clean enough to discharge.
However, even after the treatment by ALPS, radioactive water Tritium remains in the water. The density is approx. 100,000,000,000 Bq/m3.
The working group concluded it is impossible to remove Tritium with the existing technology, they decided to appeal the world for the new technology.
There are NATURAL processes that have worked for millions of years.
Kelp and algae, all aquatic creatures take up tritium.
Freshwater and seawater bivalves filter feed tritium.
An enclosed aquaculture pond system can concentrate and removed the contaminants from the waste water at Fukushima.
Tokyo Electric Power Co. put off dealing with radiation-contaminated water at its crippled nuclear power plant more than two years ago because it feared the cost of fixing the problem could bankrupt the utility. While TEPCO has grudgingly admitted it was concerned about facing bankruptcy, two lawmakers have told The Asahi Shimbun that the utility feared it would go under if it went ahead with the project.
The decision taken at the time apparently led to a delay in dealing with the radioactive water issue that has now reached crisis proportions. The two Democratic Party of Japan lawmakers were closely involved in dealing with the disaster at the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant triggered by the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and tsunami.
One of them is Banri Kaieda, who became DPJ president in 2012. At the time he served as minister of economy, trade and industry and was in charge of nuclear energy policy.
The other lawmaker was Sumio Mabuchi who served as special adviser to Naoto Kan, who was then prime minister. Mabuchi was in charge of dealing with the nuclear accident. He said he became aware early on that steps had to be taken to deal with radiation-contaminated water.
In May 2011, just two months after the nuclear disaster unfolded, TEPCO realized that groundwater was becoming contaminated after flowing into reactor buildings.
To prevent the contaminated water from leaking outside of the buildings, Mabuchi put together a report that called for constructing an impermeable steel wall sunk into the ground surrounding the structures.
However, TEPCO the following month came up with an estimate that 100 billion yen ($1 billion) would be needed to do that.
ANALYSIS: The long road ahead in ending Fukushima water problem
Even geography is working against Tokyo Electric Power Co. and the government in their struggle to deal with the persistent problem of radiation-contaminated water at the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear plant.
The site receives so much groundwater that special equipment--rendered useless by the 2011 earthquake and tsunami--was set up to prevent the plant’s buildings from floating on the continuous flow. The most pressing problem is stopping the groundwater from entering the plant’s reactor buildings, becoming contaminated and spilling into the sea.
But it is far from the only obstacle in the roadmap to decommission the reactors at the stricken plant.
TEPCO still does not know all the details of how and where groundwater is entering the buildings. Also in the dark about the full extent of the problem, the central government has stepped in and is resorting to unprecedented measures with potential pitfalls.
An estimated 800 to 1,000 tons of groundwater flows daily in the direction of the Fukushima plant buildings, a volume much larger than those at other nuclear plants.
The original site of the Fukushima No. 1 plant was a cliff more than 30 meters high. But 20 meters was lopped off to create the foundation of the nuclear plant, putting the groundwater level only a few meters below the surface.
The plant itself was constructed on land containing gravel layers through which water can easily pass through. In the past, a brook trickled by the No. 4 reactor.
According to Atsunao Marui, who heads the Groundwater Research Group at the National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, rain makes up most of the groundwater at the Fukushima plant. Water also flows in from the Abukuma Highlands.
TEPCO, Japanese officials ignored early warnings from US regarding Fukushima leaks
As early as two months after Great East Japan Earthquake and tsunami hit the Fukushima nuclear power facility and causing multiple reactor meltdowns, experts from the United States have warned Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO) – the plant’s operator – and Japanese government officials to take immediate steps to prevent groundwater contamination and eventual leakage, but this memo was shelved and successfully lobbied against as the cost for the steps would bring the utility operator closer to insolvency.
This fact was revealed by two officials who participated in the discussions and documents prepared by both governments and the utility, even as TEPCO now battles with a 300 ton daily amount of contaminated groundwater leaking into the Pacific Ocean.
TEPCO had aggressively lobbied against the proposed barrier wall that would have prevented huge amounts of groundwater from leaking because the cost at that point was estimated near US$1 billion (nearly 100 billion yen) could have started speculation and impact an already fragile investor base. A TEPCO spokesman also said that there had been concerns about the feasibility of the proposal.