It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
So if your not for the comeing Syrian war you hate Merika
Do you take Personal Responsibility and Karma on your soul for whatever happens and the people that will die, since you support it?
Oh so instead of democratically working for change one should just git up and leave?
That's insane.
They all agree 100% on giving up national sovereignty in favour of super-national organizations.
Throughout mankind's history the ultimate objective of nations has been their own survival and now (since '46)
all of them are somehow happy to give up more and more prerogatives to EU/NAU/AU/UNASUR (they are not made up) but also UN/WTO/World Bank/NAFTA/North Atlantic Free trade agreement etc. etc.
Isn't that a little weird?
And bear in mind there is 0 democratic input in those decisions. Elite sign right up to give up their citizens' right to unelected undemocratic super-national organization.
And again I ask, why are citizens' liberties taken away more and more? Why the humongous security measures?
But at the same time both in US and UK muslim extrememist proselitors are left alone and allowed to preach death for the west / death to Christians / sharia law in the UK (or insert country of choice here).
While millions of them either are born here, or get here illegaly every year.
But, at least in Europe, there's such thing as ISLAMOPHOBIC crimes?
No criticism of their radicalism is allowed.
Because of Al-Qaida? The same Al-Qaida we're supporting in Libya and Syria?
How bout that?
What about if they ban your Semi-Auto? Or handguns even? They sure want to.
Question is, how many more shootings (read:false flags) will it take? 1? 2?10? 100??
Originally posted by Thorneblood
@Aurelio
Oh so instead of democratically working for change one should just git up and leave?
That's insane.
If our leaders are just puppets then how can they be democratically elected?
Is it really a democracy if all those who are elected just do what their masters tell them?
That doesn't sound like a democracy to me.
But you know that already as you pointed out here..
Originally posted by Thorneblood
If all that is really going on then no one you vote for and nothing even remotely democratic will change that fact.
Originally posted by Thorneblood
We are way past those numbers and they haven't banned any of those guns yet.
Since that will not happen i don't see why i should worry. Guns are just too profitable to be banned in America anytime soon. When they are, maybe, but by that time i will be too old and tired to really care and would probably prefer to retire in another country anyway...
(I am thinking the Netherlands. Legal prostitution and hash bars seems like a great way to spend my golden years.)
Originally posted by Thorneblood
So which is it, are our leaders democratically elected or are they just chosen to perpetuate the NWO Agenda.
Is Obama, or any president for that matter, just a puppet or are they elected officials? Can they really be both?
If this is all planned and there is nothing you or i can do then why should we even bother at all? Why should we argue?
Originally posted by Thorneblood
why should we even bother at all?
Originally posted by HappyWarrior
Is this it? Are they seriously doing this? If they launch any kind of missile or anything else for that sake won't Russia respond?
I am confused. Russia is obviously protecting Syria and are loud and clear when it comes to any kind of attack on Syria from the west. Why on earth would the U.S, Britain and France go against the mighty bear? What do they gain from it?
ww w.independent.co.uk
(visit the link for the full news article)
Originally posted by HappyWarrior
Is this it? Are they seriously doing this? If they launch any kind of missile or anything else for that sake won't Russia respond?
I am confused. Russia is obviously protecting Syria and are loud and clear when it comes to any kind of attack on Syria from the west. Why on earth would the U.S, Britain and France go against the mighty bear? What do they gain from it?
ww w.independent.co.uk
(visit the link for the full news article)
Maybe cause someone, unlike you, might love freedom and their country for whom their ancestors bled and fought.
bled and fought.
And don't reside here just cause of "the best movies and tv shows" or "legal hookers".
Originally posted by Thorneblood
reply to post by AurelioMaghe
Your right, there are many questionable elements in the rebel forces. Even Gen. Dempsey (Obama's top military advisor) has pointed this fact out repeatedly and has taken it into account in his dealings with the President. This is one of the primary reasons that we seem to have chosen Air Strikes as opposed to the many other options that have been put on the table. The other is probably financial as many have pointed out how broke their own countries seem to be.
As for the UN, they have been there for five days waiting for Assad to give them the green light to begin their inspections, so have some journalists. In all that time they have been told to wait. That's plenty of time to clean up the evidence on the ground but as i pointed out the UK has a spying center right in the Middle East so i believe they have at least some confirmation that they simply cannot divulge for various reasons i am sure you can surmise.
Let's face it. Chemical weapons are bad, we have known Syria has them for awhile and there is at least one journalistic report from May detailing the attacks that took place at that time.
Everyone from Russia to Iran to the US seems to be arming someone there, its a #ty situation of that i cannot argue.
Ultimately though the point seems moot. They are going to do it, and the time frame of two weeks was obviously mentioned to allow for the final evidence to be gathered and presented.
I fail to see why everyone is so bent out of shape over this. This is what governments do. You all knew this was coming from the moment it happened and have had plenty of time to review what has been presented by the media to form your own opinions just like i have.
We can spend all day and night, and likely will, going round and round about this but it is clear to me at least that Obama and Cameron know more then they can say and are just allowing due process to do its duty before they let those missiles fly.
I say good. Bombs away.
Know why? Cause whenever i see a local story in my area or even in my country where some bastard hurts, rapes or kills a child it pisses me off and i want blood. I am sure many of you feel the same way anytime you see a similar story from where ever you may be.
However, when video and pictures of rows of dead children are shown from Syria everyone immediately starts to deflect and push the issue aside citing all sorts of reasons.
So perhaps the real question should be, and one i have asked before but yet to have answered, is that if this were your country or those were your kids gasping for air and dying slowly would you want someone to intervene if you did not have the power to face down your own military yourselves?
Is the life of a child in Syria worth any less then the life of a child in America, the UK, etc?
edit on 25-8-2013 by Thorneblood because: (no reason given)
Russia said that the West would be making a "tragic mistake" by launching military strikes on its ally Syria as the international community headed for a repeat of the bitter diplomatic showdowns that preceded military action in Iraq and Kosovo.
Originally posted by autopat51
Might makes right!
how can the west be wrong?