It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Thorneblood
reply to post by AurelioMaghe
CUT
edit on 25-8-2013 by Thorneblood because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by deviant300
www.youtube.com...
Worth Watching put everything in perspective.
Originally posted by wrabbit2000
I hope people realize, we're in for the long haul and occupation for this. This babble of air strikes as if it's all we'll be required to do ...IF we get away with those without losses... is foolish banter.
Libya was FAR less a chaotic situation with *FAR* less dangerous weapons to come up for grabs to whomever can physically reach each bunker first than Syria.
Iraq may have been rumors of weapons by the time 2003 rolled around. However, there is no theory to Syria. They aren't part of the Chemical Weapons treaty and so, have been producing them more or less in the open for 30 years. Their stockpiles are modern, presumably top quality and pretty much the worst of everything to include the mother of all :"why can't we uninvent it?!?", VX Gas.
Now what are they telling us is going to happen?? They are going to weaken Assad to let the rebels over-run Damascus and....then what? They'll just meekly hand-over the chem stocks? Part of what they'll see as hard won spoils of war...they'll just surrender?? We can't, in good faith to ANYTHING...let terrorists like some elements of that group HAVE them ...
So when they say we'll be in it to HELP them win it? Bull Puckey. We'll have to be boots on the ground to AT LEAST secure chemical stocks of REAL warheads which we don't even know the location of, for all of it. What could go wrong??
Originally posted by pheonix358
It is all about reducing the world population.
Do you realize that it has nothing to do with "our country" and all to do with rich inbred psychopaths with inherited money from the old families, who suffer from not only greed, but a desire to lower everyone else, in order to feel even higher above everyone else than they already are, who make use of the willing (Obama, Cameron, Hollande) who are desirous for their own little play at power?
I cannot believe that without any form of evidence my country is yet again sabre rattling.
Originally posted by Thorneblood
That is exactly what i am saying.
You always have a choice as to where you live and to which country you are loyal too.
Originally posted by Thorneblood
And trust me, i have considered it, but i still like it here in the US, we have lots of guns and food.
Originally posted by Thorneblood
I have never bought into the notion of the NWO or any such entity being able to control the whole world.............because i don't think any world leaders can put aside their ego's long enough to work together in that fashion without it all falling apart.
Originally posted by wrabbit2000
I hope people realize, we're in for the long haul and occupation for this. This babble of air strikes as if it's all we'll be required to do ...IF we get away with those without losses... is foolish banter.
Libya was FAR less a chaotic situation with *FAR* less dangerous weapons to come up for grabs to whomever can physically reach each bunker first than Syria.
Iraq may have been rumors of weapons by the time 2003 rolled around. However, there is no theory to Syria. They aren't part of the Chemical Weapons treaty and so, have been producing them more or less in the open for 30 years. Their stockpiles are modern, presumably top quality and pretty much the worst of everything to include the mother of all :"why can't we uninvent it?!?", VX Gas.
Now what are they telling us is going to happen?? They are going to weaken Assad to let the rebels over-run Damascus and....then what? They'll just meekly hand-over the chem stocks? Part of what they'll see as hard won spoils of war...they'll just surrender?? We can't, in good faith to ANYTHING...let terrorists like some elements of that group HAVE them ...
So when they say we'll be in it to HELP them win it? Bull Puckey. We'll have to be boots on the ground to AT LEAST secure chemical stocks of REAL warheads which we don't even know the location of, for all of it. What could go wrong??
Originally posted by crazyewok
Originally posted by earthling42
reply to post by Thorneblood
And they reside in their ivory tower while soldiers and civilians die.
I dont plan on doing nay dying over there
If the UK ever insituted a draft I will tell em were to put it
Originally posted by wrabbit2000
reply to post by pheonix358
It may be false something or other to us.....but to those Jihadis among the ranks of the FSA, really fighting and really dying in this? There is nothing false about it. That's where I think we've badly screwed up in that we have a tiger by the tail and depend on a total wild card under it's own agendas for key US Policy goals. It's insane.
I wouldn't be shocked to hear Kerry might actually believe an FSA run Syria would be helpful for the Israeli/Pal peace process he's still forcing on people who don't want it.
The US has already crossed lines which are beyond simply taboo. They are surreal. We're literally supporting a group which, at least among factions, ARE Al Qaeda...while we are fighting Al Qaeda (REAL people are REALLY killing and dying anyway) in Yemen and Afghanistan. It's madness.....
So I don't take anything for granted at this point. Not now.