The mind-blowing game-changer you can't unsee.

Originally posted by OneManArmy
The thread title should be changed....

"Unremarkable theory regarding objects that you cant see"

My mind was very much un-blown, and there really was "nothing to see here".

Im starting to realise that every thread title that says "absolute proof", "game changer", "mind blowing" is a cover for the serious lack of substance to the remarkable claims made.

What is mind blowing is that people think that some of this stuff is in any way remarkable.

I'm trying, I'm really trying to star it twice, it won't let me

reply to post by Char-Lee


The problem is their agenda...first 4 pages, and no less than 5 peons all slamming their knuckles on the same misleading rotation point. FFS, they don't give up easily, and turn to using terms like "ignorant" and "small-minded" very quickly. The way that this group of people can believe everything a MILITARY organization throws at them (especially in this day and age) is astounding, and would lead you to believe they're on the wrong forum if they want true discussion on these matters.

reply to post by RUInsane

If you meant to let others "express their thoughts", than you'd also calmly engage criticism of your so-called "mind-blowing game changer".

Why, they don't just critique the thread they criticize the person and use names like fool and uneducated, knowing not one thing about the person they are talking to. In no way should that ever happen in any thread. the point is to discuss the theory being put forward not childish name calling.

reply to post by raymundoko


I've been reading this thread way before you came along...it was only 3 pages back then. Please do not imply you know about my activities herein.

The NASA scientist you're mentioning didn't say anything about 2012/05/02 time step 5mins later then voila! A lens artifact! 2012/05/28 boom! de nada!

Plus do not address me as "this guy", I sir have an online name...as do have you. raymundoko...what is that? A Filipino name?

If you think this thread or topic is already solved and debunked. I respect your opinion. But please...do not blame us if the aliens come and probe your ass, and we say...WE TOLD YAH! :p

Originally posted by raymundoko
reply to post by Char-Lee

 

www.thefreedictionary.com...

1. One who is deficient in judgment, sense, or understanding.

Having just enough information to not fully understand something, then running with your uneducated hypothesis in the face of pretty solid evidence is the very definition of foolishness.

Foolishness in my definition is spending your time reading and thinking about stuff in a forum you clearly find foolish in the first place.

Just going off the most recent pics the OP posted but if you go to the site (Helioviewer.org) and put in the date of 5/2/2012 and time of 19:14:07 the artifact is not there. 1 second later the artifact appears. Also at this time you can see a change in the environment where as many seconds before or after you do not see this. I don't know how to do gifs otherwise I would.




Ok I created a gif and there is a 2 second delay between the two frames.But I don't think it matters as what I thought was a 1 second difference was technically a 3 minute difference or so. But I wanted to see if I could create a gif which I did and it was super easy.

reply to post by HawkeyeNation


Glad to see someone is looking for themselves. Happy hunting!
btw - check the date and time on top of your chosen observatory. If this value is green, it means that the time you entered is close to the time an image was taken. If it turns yellow or orange or red it means that an image hasn't been taken close to the date or time you specified. Sometimes the time between images can be minutes, sometimes weeks. If you enter a date of 1899 for example, you will be shown the next available image which would be Jan 29, 2007 if memory serves. Any date after Jan29 2007, the viewer will show the nearest image (be it before or after your date.)
Stereo don't take images every second, you see?

Originally posted by HiramA
reply to post by HawkeyeNation

 

Glad to see someone is looking for themselves. Happy hunting!
btw - check the date and time on top of your chosen observatory. If this value is green, it means that the time you entered is close to the time an image was taken. If it turns yellow or orange or red it means that an image hasn't been taken close to the date or time you specified. Sometimes the time between images can be minutes, sometimes weeks. If you enter a date of 1899 for example, you will be shown the next available image which would be Jan 29, 2007 if memory serves. Any date after Jan29 2007, the viewer will show the nearest image (be it before or after your date.)
Stereo don't take images every second, you see?

Ah ok...yep I see that now. Looks like what I was referencing as 1 second was actually about 3 minutes then. Well I'm going to try this gif thing for #s and giggles regardless, lol. Thanks for the input.

As far back as 1999 people have already been looking at solar anomalies and phenomena...here's a link to one of them. I'm just putting it out there for reading and comparison.


1999 SOLAR ANOMALY

Not debunked yet? Exxxxxxxxxxxxcellent *said like Mr. Burns from The Simpsons*

Looking forward to reading more!

Dude, this is the same thing that has been showing up forever. Anyone who regularly uses helioviewer or watches any of the the suspiciousobservers or suspect sky you tube chanbels is well aware of the issue.


Sorry to burst your artifact bubble but that's all it is. Its been around for quite sonetime and it has been well investigated.

Its not nibiru, that is a 100% fact as anyone who has read sumarian can tell you, nibiru does not appear in any of thier writings niether does anything else stichin claimed.

You put sone effort into your post, perhaps you would consider reading the translations and looking at the translation tables readily available online as well. Then you can put yoour work ethic into somerhing real. There are plenty of unexplained things out there. Dont waste your life chasing a comic book story.

Interesting, but I'm not sure which game it is that you claim is being changed.

reply to post by vind21


I didn't claim it was Nibiru.
If it's common knowledge, please tell us all what this bubble (and all the other ones) are.
And no, anomaly or artifact will just not be specific enough.

reply to post by HiramA


Currently on my cell. I may find the time to produce a few well done video explinations.

But please consider this: there are several different satalites looking at the sun in every known spectrum. There are other space agencies as well. It may take some time but the data is available to show this object is not visible on any other satalite.

reply to post by HiramA


Great stuff Hiram. Wow what a great find. You will probably never get a call from NASA and if I am not mistaken these pics will be removed. Please take screen shots or save them how ever you can. You have stumbled onto something quite extraordinary. Good luck with your research.

Originally posted by vind21
reply to post by HiramA

 

Currently on my cell. I may find the time to produce a few well done video explinations.

But please consider this: there are several different satalites looking at the sun in every known spectrum. There are other space agencies as well. It may take some time but the data is available to show this object is not visible on any other satalite.

Won't do you any good. I already did that back on page 3 of this thread:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

including listing the artifacts that happen when using a coronagraph and the camera defects themselves with STEREO.

OP blew it off, because the pictures do not have all the same time stamps (apparently this massive object can move around and avoid all the other solar observatories, except STEREO).

But good luck here.

Attention:

Please refrain from personal jabs and insults and remember this forum is under special scrutiny. Everyone is entitled to express their opinions.

Members who would seek to refute such theories should be mindful of our tradition of supporting the examination of the extraterrestrial phenomenon on the related conspiracy theories, cover-ups, and scandals. Replies that make fun or otherwise ridicule and demean those posting honest experiences and/or questions will be removed. Members who post such responses repeatedly will be banned.

Mod Note: ALL MEMBERS: We expect civility and decorum within all topics - Please Review This Link.

Blaine91555
Forum Moderator

I have seen countless SOHO images that clearly show some sort of foreign objects. I'll have to dig around for them but they are always gigantic.

Nice find.

I have heard from sources in the military that these objects in front of the sun are space ships. The military believes they are there to create a massive solar storm to save earth by wiping out 3/4 of mankind. It links to a project the military did in remote viewing in the 70's. they call it the kill shot. The military has been building massive cities underground to survive this kill shoy

reply to post by HiramA


Precisely if the camera moves, the camera "fleck" would also move, as it is physically on the lens. But.... whatever that IS doesn't move when the image is rotated, meaning that it can't be ON the camera lens.