It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Behold a Computer Generated Man!

page: 2
11
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 16 2013 @ 01:26 AM
link   
folks, this is such high farce at this stage.



mark pot-ok is a 100% virtual animation character and everything he is
discussing including Obama and the boston bombing is swamped in fakery.
and it is all being outed, slowly but surely. inexorably! indubitably!

look for the glitches and flaws in pot-ok's facial movements.

also look at the size of tsarnaev's (who never existed) neck at 0.43secs.


his head looks pasted on to the tiny shoulders here.

this is all becoming so hilarious, and there is much more to come. so stay tuned.

50 really the magic number!



posted on Aug, 16 2013 @ 01:32 AM
link   
I have to post this again, it is so fricken hilarious!!!!



what a world class schnowzer, eh?
do you think he had digital surgery to have it replaced?
do you think dr. lucas performed the surgery?



posted on Aug, 16 2013 @ 01:54 AM
link   
I saw a computer generated man.
But it wasn't in the Opening post.
I also saw a semi-generated man (Max Headroom)

What i didn't see was a computer generated man in the Opening post.
The guy is odd looking, yes. The first interview was obviously via crappy Webcam/lighting, choppy bandwidth.
That's all I am seeing.
Good luck with the continued puffery though.



posted on Aug, 16 2013 @ 09:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by spacedoubt
I saw a computer generated man.
But it wasn't in the Opening post.
I also saw a semi-generated man (Max Headroom)

What i didn't see was a computer generated man in the Opening post.
The guy is odd looking, yes. The first interview was obviously via crappy Webcam/lighting, choppy bandwidth.
That's all I am seeing.
Good luck with the continued puffery though.


that's cool , my friend. any comment on the image directly above your post?
keep your nose to the grindstone.



posted on Aug, 16 2013 @ 11:49 AM
link   
reply to post by TopsyTurvyOne
 


Grindstone would hurt!
I'd rephrase what I said before...He's not Camera Friendly.
possibly, the ole "Gin Blossom" with some makeup.



posted on Aug, 16 2013 @ 01:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by spacedoubt
reply to post by TopsyTurvyOne
 


Grindstone would hurt!
I'd rephrase what I said before...He's not Camera Friendly.
possibly, the ole "Gin Blossom" with some makeup.





you haven't a great nose yourself for this stuff, eh spacedoubt?

but I know the score!


50 ways to leave your bother!



posted on Aug, 17 2013 @ 06:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by spacedoubt
reply to post by TopsyTurvyOne
 


Grindstone would hurt!
I'd rephrase what I said before...He's not Camera Friendly.
possibly, the ole "Gin Blossom" with some makeup.



read 'em and weep, my friend. read 'em and weep.


here is just one of many examples I could give of generated man, mark
pot-ok.


from



from



'glitches' all over the place (purposefully so) but now go to 3.35mins and watch the
BS effort at sinc-ing the voice to the mouth movements. also look at his forehead
and his shoulders throughout.
this is no accident. take note of the topics he discusses and you will find them as fake as
he himself is.

and 50 is really a magic number.

let's hear you then!

edit on 17-8-2013 by TopsyTurvyOne because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 17 2013 @ 08:54 PM
link   
Thanks for the interesting thread and encouraging optimism throughout, OP!

His face does this thing where it moves in waves or like, sectors, no matter what camera he's on. I'd like to see a closeup of his eyes.
Do you guys remember what Robbie Parker's (Sandy Hook) eyes looked like? They were totally flat and very dark. I've seen this in certain on-camera characters and in real life.
edit on 17-8-2013 by rawheroine because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 17 2013 @ 09:00 PM
link   

Originally posted by TopsyTurvyOne

Originally posted by spacedoubt
reply to post by TopsyTurvyOne
 


Grindstone would hurt!
I'd rephrase what I said before...He's not Camera Friendly.
possibly, the ole "Gin Blossom" with some makeup.



read 'em and weep, my friend. read 'em and weep.


here is just one of many examples I could give of generated man, mark
pot-ok.



Aha, you already have a closeup of his eyes! It's hard to tell, but it seems like they could have that dull, flat quality like other characters'. Like they absorb light completely but don't reflect at all - no shine or emotion in them (indicative of these "people"s entire way of being, BTW)
edit on 17-8-2013 by rawheroine because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 18 2013 @ 04:07 AM
link   

Originally posted by rawheroine
Thanks for the interesting thread and encouraging optimism throughout, OP!

His face does this thing where it moves in waves or like, sectors, no matter what camera he's on. I'd like to see a closeup of his eyes.
Do you guys remember what Robbie Parker's (Sandy Hook) eyes looked like? They were totally flat and very dark. I've seen this in certain on-camera characters and in real life.
edit on 17-8-2013 by rawheroine because: (no reason given)


thank you for the response rawheroine.
now more that ever there is every reason in
the world to be optimistic. please smile and laugh as much as you can bare and make
complete peace with yourself, your loved ones and everyone you come into contact with,
in as much as you can, my friend.
sandyhoax was another faked event and I suspect Robbie parker (like anders breivik in
his 'court appearances') was another c.g.m. (computer generated man). I think that there
are problems getting the eyes to look realistic and lifelike with the technology available and
that is why these characters are never shown looking directly into the 'camera'.
on the latest video I posted of mark pot-ok there are so many 'glitches' that it cannot be
anything other than intentional.
as I said, we are being educated in the modus operandi of past fakeries as all things
hidden must be revealed, as we enter into this new and wondrous age.



posted on Aug, 18 2013 @ 04:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by rawheroine

Originally posted by TopsyTurvyOne

Originally posted by spacedoubt
reply to post by TopsyTurvyOne
 


Grindstone would hurt!
I'd rephrase what I said before...He's not Camera Friendly.
possibly, the ole "Gin Blossom" with some makeup.



read 'em and weep, my friend. read 'em and weep.


here is just one of many examples I could give of generated man, mark
pot-ok.



Aha, you already have a closeup of his eyes! It's hard to tell, but it seems like they could have that dull, flat quality like other characters'. Like they absorb light completely but don't reflect at all - no shine or emotion in them (indicative of these "people"s entire way of being, BTW)
edit on 17-8-2013 by rawheroine because: (no reason given)


this close-up was pointing out the patchwork 'glitches' at the mouth, just in case you
didn't realise rawheroine.
look at how terrible this effort is!
what is equally important to this tech. failure is the topics which 'he' mentions. this
fake man is pointing us to fake issues that have dominated the media in the past.
the boston bombings, sandy hook and aurora shootings, trayvon martin and George
Zimmerman, Obama fakeries etc. were all so badly done for the purposes of our
education into the ways of these and other past deceptions.
now people might start looking at 9/11, 7/7, Madrid train bombings etc. and
especially JFK (50 years this year since the fassassination (faked assassination)
of this 'total man' in this new light. and the more people do, the quicker we can
get on with things.
(you remember the names of the four pilots on board the recent 777 plane 'crash
landing' in san Francisco-broadcast on msm?...sum ting wong, we tu lo, ho li fuk
and ding bang ow!).

all recent faked stories point to and point clearly to government complicities and
wrong-doings.
this has always been the case, as 'they' are exposed as the real 'enemy'
we must/will never give up our power again.

a wonderful new beginning awaits us all, THIS YEAR!!!!!



posted on Aug, 18 2013 @ 04:36 AM
link   
again, his name is key to the changes to come. hemp oil cures all forms
of cancer and once it is realised that 'pot-really is-ok', not only the medical
and pharmaceutical industries, but the petro-chemical, paper, clothing and
number of other industries that were part and parcel of our enslavement
are changed forever.

50 is really the magic number.


edit on 18-8-2013 by TopsyTurvyOne because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 18 2013 @ 10:47 AM
link   
mark potok has spoken in person at countless meetings , also conferences , lectures etc etc



posted on Aug, 18 2013 @ 10:58 AM
link   

Originally posted by TopsyTurvyOne

Originally posted by rawheroine
Thanks for the interesting thread and encouraging optimism throughout, OP!

His face does this thing where it moves in waves or like, sectors, no matter what camera he's on. I'd like to see a closeup of his eyes.
Do you guys remember what Robbie Parker's (Sandy Hook) eyes looked like? They were totally flat and very dark. I've seen this in certain on-camera characters and in real life.
edit on 17-8-2013 by rawheroine because: (no reason given)


as I said, we are being educated in the modus operandi of past fakeries as all things
hidden must be revealed, as we enter into this new and wondrous age.




I love this! I agree totally, and I have asked myself so many times WHY are they making it so obvious? And why are there always puns and jokes?? Pot-OK seems to be one of them. They love "off-color" humor too (so to speak). My favorite lately is Snowden White the Informer with his tales of a magic mirror - MAN, they packed a lot of puns and allusions in that illusion!

I've applauded a few times after reading a particularly entertaining news item - is that OK? I hope whoever's doing it appreciates that. (DARPA-hired screenwriter[s]? Satan? God? Helpful aliens? Matrix Deconstruction Administrator?)

If you want to have nightmares, here's one I found while scanning Robbie Parker's scary eyeballs:




posted on Aug, 18 2013 @ 03:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by rawheroine

Originally posted by TopsyTurvyOne

Originally posted by rawheroine
Thanks for the interesting thread and encouraging optimism throughout, OP!

His face does this thing where it moves in waves or like, sectors, no matter what camera he's on. I'd like to see a closeup of his eyes.
Do you guys remember what Robbie Parker's (Sandy Hook) eyes looked like? They were totally flat and very dark. I've seen this in certain on-camera characters and in real life.
edit on 17-8-2013 by rawheroine because: (no reason given)


as I said, we are being educated in the modus operandi of past fakeries as all things
hidden must be revealed, as we enter into this new and wondrous age.




I love this! I agree totally, and I have asked myself so many times WHY are they making it so obvious? And why are there always puns and jokes?? Pot-OK seems to be one of them. They love "off-color" humor too (so to speak). My favorite lately is Snowden White the Informer with his tales of a magic mirror - MAN, they packed a lot of puns and allusions in that illusion!

I've applauded a few times after reading a particularly entertaining news item - is that OK? I hope whoever's doing it appreciates that. (DARPA-hired screenwriter[s]? Satan? God? Helpful aliens? Matrix Deconstruction Administrator?)

If you want to have nightmares, here's one I found while scanning Robbie Parker's scary eyeballs:



applaud, giggle, smile, laugh your arse off my friend.
you have made my night with the snowden magic mirror man reference! Michael
Jackson (faked death) has a major role to play behind the scenes and of course
MJ sang man in the mirror!
MJ 'died' at 50 years of age and it is 50 months this month since his 'death' date'!

and as you might have read here, 50 is really the magic number!
edit on 18-8-2013 by TopsyTurvyOne because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 18 2013 @ 06:48 PM
link   
"Michael" as a name sure comes up a lot, too - any thoughts on that?

I'm interested in your "50" concept, I'll be looking out for it, because that's not a number I've paid much attention to before. 49 +1 ? New gold rush? (alchemy?) #50 on the periodic table is tin, as in tin foil

Does 50 have something to do with the killing of the king?


(No need to disclose more if you don't feel like it, because it's cool when it's all mysterious too, but I'm intrigued because I'm digging your other concepts on this thread.)



posted on Aug, 18 2013 @ 07:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by rawheroine
"Michael" as a name sure comes up a lot, too - any thoughts on that?

I'm interested in your "50" concept, I'll be looking out for it, because that's not a number I've paid much attention to before. 49 +1 ? New gold rush? (alchemy?) #50 on the periodic table is tin, as in tin foil

Does 50 have something to do with the killing of the king?


(No need to disclose more if you don't feel like it, because it's cool when it's all mysterious too, but I'm intrigued because I'm digging your other concepts on this thread.)


www.davidicke.com...

here is a thread I penned recently.

everything that has happened (or not, as the case may be) has happened
for the most excellent of reasons, my friend.

out with the old and in with the (very old) new!

50 really is the magic number.



posted on Aug, 20 2013 @ 12:05 AM
link   
OP, have you ever heard of the movie Mister Lonely? Reminds me a lot of your thread here.



posted on Aug, 22 2013 @ 03:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by rawheroine
OP, have you ever heard of the movie Mister Lonely? Reminds me a lot of your thread here.


never heard of it.
www.imdb.com...


what a strange trailer? (part 1 of 8).
[url]http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0475984/

all is well, my friend.

laugh loud.
edit on 22-8-2013 by TopsyTurvyOne because: (no reason given)







 
11
<< 1   >>

log in

join