It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by IsntLifeFunny
I hope you all join me in the real world where we can actually make a difference.
Originally posted by Hefficide
Just posting to apologize for being largely absent from this thread for the past 24 hours... I had a doctors appointment yesterday and my aunt passed away the day before that. I have to attend the funeral in a few hours but then will get back here to reply to everyone who's had questions.
Originally posted by Painterz
Here in the UK it seems like we're now getting bombarded with stories about kids killing themselves following online abuse on websites, with the subtext - 'The internet is dangerous and kills our children, it must be CONTROLLED!'
Which is presumably how they're going to sell it here.
Originally posted by Hefficide
reply to post by miniatus
The inference intended was not to suggest that we are being targeted on the same level currently... rather than the potential exists.
Having said that, given the recent admission that certain political groups were inappropriately targeted for IRS attention based upon their political affiliations, combined with the fact that people are now being arrested for online posts fairly often, combined with the intensified media push to marginalize the "conspiracy" community?
It all does add up.
Do I fear black Suburbans swarming my house currently? No. But do I wonder if I might be rejected for jobs, or for social aid, or find myself being audited... and things of that nature? I think that concern is 100% valid and not in the realm of fear mongering.
The further concern is that once taboos are broken, they tend to just keep getting worse. Once a taboo is willingly violated, it becomes the new normal.
Originally posted by Painterz
Here in the UK it seems like we're now getting bombarded with stories about kids killing themselves following online abuse on websites, with the subtext - 'The internet is dangerous and kills our children, it must be CONTROLLED!'
Which is presumably how they're going to sell it here.
Originally posted by miniatus
.. however, it's accurate and very valid to say that terror groups HAVE been using forums for collaboration and planning for quite a while now and with the NSA's prism system being disclosed to the public .. there is no question they are likely paranoid about using standard forms of communication.. that stands to reason.
I think there's some serious fear mongering going on by suggesting that this is targeting "us" ..
These organizations no doubt do NOT do their planning in public forums.. if they did, then they would be morons .. the forums are probably closed, invite only and encrypted with https ..
The People's Republic of China (PRC) is alleged to undertake a widespread effort to acquire U.S. military technology and classified information[citation needed]. To fulfill its long-term military development goals, the PRC uses a variety of methods to obtain U.S. technology -- including espionage, the exploitation of commercial entities, and a network of scientific, academic, and business contacts.
In secretive chat rooms and on encrypted Internet message boards, al-Qaida fighters have been planning and coordinating attacks — including a threatened if vague plot that U.S. officials say closed 19 diplomatic posts across Africa and the Middle East for more than a week. It's highly unlikely that al-Qaida's top leader,
But the unspecified call to arms by the al-Qaida leaders, using a multilayered subterfuge to pass messages from couriers to tech-savvy underlings to attackers, provoked a quick reaction by the U.S. to protect Americans in far-flung corners of the worldwhere the terror network is evolving into regional hubs. For years, extremists have used online forums to share information and drum up support, and over the past decade they have developed systems that blend encryption programs with anonymity software to hide their tracks. Jihadist technology may now be so sophisticated and secretive, experts say, that many communications avoid detection by National Security Agency programs that were designed to uncover terror plots.
Indefinite detention without trial: Section 1021[edit source | editbeta] The detention sections of the NDAA begin by "affirm[ing]" that the authority of the President under the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Terrorists (AUMF), a joint resolution passed in the immediate aftermath of the September 11, 2001 attacks, includes the power to detain, via the Armed Forces, any person, including a US citizen,[13][21] "who was part of or substantially supported al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners", and anyone who commits a "belligerent act" against the U.S. or its coalition allies in aid of such enemy forces, under the law of war, "without trial, until the end of the hostilities authorized by the [AUMF]".
Originally posted by SquirrelNutz
Wow - a few thoughts on this.
1) You (general) had to know this day would come.
2) 'They' are kinda right (when you get right down to it) - the fact that this could eventually be the impetus for shutting you down, IS a little disturbing, but this type of 'activity' certainly stands in the way of Big Brother's ultimate plan*.
3) But, you are also right - in terms of the propaganda, and the liberties that will, no doubt, be taken (Read: 'abused') to suppress, control, and/or eliminate 'potential threats' to this plan (*complete control of everything and everyone)
4) What about Facebook? Surely, in some roundabout way, that could be considered a 'Forum' given the propensity for people to not only post political content but also for those posts to evolve into actual discussions every bit as serious, heated, threatening, etc, as we get in here at ATS.
(how many other people just got captured there?)
We have the playbook right in front of us (Orwell 1984) yet [the populace, in general] choose to ignore it.
We are doomed, I'm afraid.
Edit to add: The old boiling Frog anecdote - wouldn't people be a lot more likely to respond and take notice if we [the people] compiled a list of freedoms or crazy / threatening legislation that has been implemented that simply did not exist 5 or 10 or 20 years ago? (Hmmmm... a project)edit on 8/16/2013 by SquirrelNutz because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by jlafleur02
In reference to the encryption software, If the government had the source code for the encryption software would it be able to reverse engineer a way to break any code. It is encrypted with a program and I would think if they had the software code that was used then they would know how to decrypt it? Is this how it works or do you need the key no matter what?
Originally posted by Em2013
The fact that ATS isn't SSL is what bothers me, but I hope that all of the database stuff is encrypted. I also hope that ATS has the balls to say no to the government should they demand everyone's username and passwords.edit on 16-8-2013 by Em2013 because: said SSH instead of SSL lawl