It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I agree.
I class it as progress
I don't see a lot of "rubbishing" of alternatives but until those alternatives are cheaper than fossil fuels they won't replace them nor will appropriate effort (money) be put into their development. Oil, coal, and gas are just still too cheap in comparison. That will change. People, as a whole, don't tend to change anything until it becomes absolutely necessary (my house needs painting but it's too hot outside now). But that's not really a conspiracy. It's human nature.
But my main bug bear is those who cannot see past oil, and who constantly rubbish alternatives and who - in doing so - suppress innovation and expression that can lead to progress.
Originally posted by TheRedneck
reply to post by VoidHawk
It's been proven that adding water can indeed increase mileage per gallon. I'd explain but...
Here you go:
By atomizing water into vapor, it evaporates almost immediately upon contact with the air/fuel mixture, decreasing the temperature and increasing the density of the mixture. A denser air/fuel mixture tends to ignite more easily and exhibit a more stable burn, increasing the power transmission from the oxidation process to mechanical energy.
We used this back in the 80s hot-rodding old muscle cars.
What d'ya do with it. Dump it in the crick?
Sux cleaning it though.
Originally posted by Grimpachi
I have been tinkering on a redneck free energy generator for a while.
It is just a small generator which I feed hydrogen to instead of gas. It has a few problems but it works for a while before over heating.
Oh the free part well that's redneck free. We have a stainless steel container that was once used for milking cows but now we throw our beer cans in there with a potassium hydroxide water mix, cap it off and WAA LAA we have hydrogen until the cans dissolve. Sux cleaning it though.edit on 2-8-2013 by Grimpachi because: (no reason given)
Increasing the power of an engine by injecting water does not mean an increase in power with a [constant] specific amount of power used .
I don't think you read the link or quote I posted, which not only answers that but also explains why it works better at higher throttle levels, which your previous post doesn't seem to acknowledge.
Originally posted by TheRedneck
reply to post by Arbitrageur
Who is "they"? Water injection back in the 80s was an accepted method to increase horsepower without increasing fuel usage.
Originally posted by LABTECH767
A similar idea though it would likely require a very different technique due to the impractability of a ram scoop on a car and the cars lower speed being insufficient to produce enough pressure to condense the gas would prevent a similar method from working yet a nano filter that could selectively filter the oxygen...