It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
And don't give me the free ride complaint. Fact is, Americans these days work longer and harder than they did 40 years ago to try and pay for a cost of living that is leaving them choking on its dust. Back in the 70s a father could be the sole bread winner, buy a home, purchase a new car, take an annual vacation, and send one or both kids to college on his salary alone. Now both parents are forced to work just to make it to the next month where they'll again have to make the decision "food or bills?"
Why does Costco do so much, so differently? Well, apparently Costco's business model allows for it and Walmarts really doesn't. I mean, look at comments here. Look at the general feeling, right or wrong. Walmart is despised by a good % of people ...and among those who STILL shop there. Why? They are, in most every case, the cheapest. When Americans rarely EVER have enough these days to feel like everything is paid and everything in need has been bought, every month? Dollars matter ...and spending $20 more to buy things at Target means $20 worth of things that were needed, won't be purchased now.
According to pricing studies conducted by Customer Growth Partners, a consumer research firm, January, February and March all revealed Target's prices were lower than Wal-Mart's. The monthly study, which is conducted in four states, compares products across segments, including 30 fresh, frozen and nonperishable groceries, eight household chemicals, paper and other consumables like detergent, seven health and beauty aids like shampoo and counter medicines, and 10 general merchandise items like apparel and toys.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
I don't dispute the problem and I don't dispute the need to see about solving it. I DO dispute the right Government has to dictate wages to ANY private sector business without it applying to EVERY private sector business. If D.C. wants to force higher wages? Fine... Raise Min. Wage and see how that works out for them.
Originally posted by benrl
Yea, its not like another bloated government intervention is not already hurting those workers, You know how many people are being moved from full time to part time, or hours cut to make sure they don't sneak into 40 hours on accident just to skip the insurance requirement?
We end up paying for these companies by their employees having to receive benefits from the government just to live.
OH poor walmart needs to pay its employees jack and !@#$ in order to reap the full benefits that the government allows them by allowing cheep trade tariffs and the exportation of jobs.
Cry me a river for walmart Wrabbit, Lets Cut the government out, tax export goods like we should, let walmart buy their goods while facing the same cost with out the tax breaks, and lets see how the free market works this out.
OH no? thats not what we are asking? we are asking walmart pay their god damn employees a wage they can survive on?
How screwed are we as a country.
Originally posted by Tazkven
Furthermore ...
Every time one of these threads gets started business owners, yes we know who you are, start whining and complaining about how hard they got it, let me make this very clear.
If you are paying people poverty wages with no medical insurance the dilemma we are facing is YOUR fault.
Oh, yes it is ...
You want to complain about food-stamps, Obama-care, the deficit and high taxes and guess what? Because you wanted to kick the can down the road, someone had to pick up YOUR slack and guess who it was? All of us, yes ... even you. Your business is costing ALL OF US money. So quit complaining.
ALL OF US are reaping what you sowed.
Thanks, BTW ...
Originally posted by Tazkven
you are clinging to some absurd "ideal" that if a cashier or a floor sweeper made 20 bucks an hour, the Doctors are going to get pissed off and demand more money because of some class you took
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
Oh, I really HAVE to mention something else...
For everyone SUDDENLY worried and whining about how Walmart workers take food stamps? Where was all that outrage or even a passing care or thought as the stories come out on the sheer %'s of MILITARY families on Food Stamps? Do we ever....EVER...hear of "living wage" debates for our armed forces? Hell no... No one cares then, it seems.
So the selective outrage over food stamps from workers is just that. SO selective, it's sickening. Go chat up a married PFC or Corporal and see how happy his finances are back home. That IS our own Government and OUR own Congress controlling the pay. No need to cross lines or establish new precedent......yet, again, the outrage is HIGHLY selective.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by Tazkven
you are clinging to some absurd "ideal" that if a cashier or a floor sweeper made 20 bucks an hour, the Doctors are going to get pissed off and demand more money because of some class you took
It's called INFLATION. Educate yourself. And that 'some class' I took ... economics and business economics.
Oh .. and if cashiers are making $20 an hour for a job that has no requirement for skills or education ... then they are paid just fine and shouldn't get a raise. So what are you whining about? Answer .. nothing.
Originally posted by Tazkven
Now show me proof that this is ruining the economy, that the doctor's are in a uproar or even a shred of proof these Cashiers making 20 bucks an hour is making the price of good's go up.
It's ok, I'll wait
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
reply to post by Tazkven
My point here isn't to defend Walmart either way. I hauled freight in and out of their Distribution Centers for most of my career and they are *NOT* my favorite people. Cheesy, nitpicking, penny pinching little scrooges. Personally, I won't feel bad to see their corporate fortunes fall over time. Perhaps even crash at some point.
My disagreement is a basic one. Equal Protection under the Law. Do we watch the STATE single out Walmart for a real special kind of hate or do we watch them single out that whole sector of the economy where non-union labor is used? (what this is ALL really about and has been for many years of non-stop fighting).
If Government is to nationalize American business and industry to the level of dictating payroll policy to SOME and not to OTHERS? We might as well hoist the Hammer and Sickle and call each other Comrade. We ARE in a full state of central Government control over every aspect of every life in this nation at that point. They may not have USED it to touch everyone, but that will have established it for now and forever.
That's one hell of a thing to cede to Washington's central authority over a paycheck not being what people want it to be. Especially when, again, Walmart is following the NORMAL PRACTICES for business in the United States, among their sector of the economy. Sure...SOME pay more. It is NOT Government's place or authority on ANY level to get into choosing winners by economic policy or punitive measure against others they "think" deserve it.
...but again, Walmart is extra special for all this attention ...rather than being intellectually honest with the topic like D.C. COULD be and just say *EVERYONE* is being raised on pay, period. That at least makes it Constitutional for that equal protections clause.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
Oh, I really HAVE to mention something else...
For everyone SUDDENLY worried and whining about how Walmart workers take food stamps? Where was all that outrage or even a passing care or thought as the stories come out on the sheer %'s of MILITARY families on Food Stamps? Do we ever....EVER...hear of "living wage" debates for our armed forces? Hell no... No one cares then, it seems.
So the selective outrage over food stamps from workers is just that. SO selective, it's sickening. Go chat up a married PFC or Corporal and see how happy his finances are back home. That IS our own Government and OUR own Congress controlling the pay. No need to cross lines or establish new precedent......yet, again, the outrage is HIGHLY selective.
Originally posted by Garkiniss
That company isn't hurting. They can afford to pay their workers more.
Originally posted by Tazkven
Why can't someone who works for a multi-billion dollar company EARN a fair wage?
Originally posted by Tazkven
What the hell is wrong with you people?
Source
A Department of Agriculture report last year showed that more than 5,000 of the 48 million Americans receiving Supplementary Nutritional Assistance Program (food stamps) listed their employment status as "active duty military," the Pentagon officials said.
"Military members who receive SNAP tend to be made up of members in junior pay grades with larger than average household sizes," said Navy Lt. Cmdr. Nate Christensen, a Defense Department spokesman.
"Military members normally 'promote out' of the need for additional subsistence benefits, due to the corresponding raises in basic pay and other allowances as one moves to a higher pay grade," Christensen said in an e-mail statement.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
So...because Walmart has money, you are, by rights, entitled to what you think is your fair share of it? :shk:
Originally posted by Tazkven
A simple No, I have no proof of any of this would suffice bro