Normandie Cliff Collapses, Orbs Fly Out?

I'm not sure our definitions of "enhanced" agree


At anyrate, if it looks like a gull, flaps like a gull, and sounds like a gull...

Originally posted by Krokodil
video still

Why is that "video still" 1.600 x 902 pixels while the YouTube video is only 854 x 480?

Here is the "bird" before it flew off
enhanced + enlarged + turned 90 degrees counterclockwise

I don't think that's the bird, as the bird moves from left to right and from bottom to the top of the frame (at first), and I think it's visible just before it appears as bright as we finally see it because it came from the shadow into the light.

This is the first frame where the bird is visible.


I think this frame shows that what you considered as the bird is still there when we see the real bird flying in front of the falling cliff.


And the changes made to the image are too exaggerated, the image did not get enhanced, it only got worse.

PS: no changes were made to the above images, I just used "Print Screen" to grab the frames from Avidemux.

reply to post by mcx1942


It's quite clear to see it's bird when you watch it FULL SCREEN!!!

Hi All

I downloaded the video from youtube captured this frame at 1:02 on the video the bird was at the bottom edge.



You can see the classic gull wing shape.

Here is a gull picture I took a few days ago while on a boat trip the bird followed the boat about 50-100ft behind for about 10 mins compare the colour and wing shape. Image cropped and shrunk to show on here.



I tried to show a picture with the wings in a similar position.

Why is that "video still" 1.600 x 902 pixels while the YouTube video is only 854 x 480?

Because thats how i found it, on the link that's printed on the picture.
It looked better then others i found, so i took it.

I don't think that's the bird, as the bird moves from left to right ....

I KNOW which one is the bird.
As i said at the end of the first photo series, more is coming,
and here it comes now.
That was first still while the "bird" was stil inside.
Be patient.

I think this frame shows that what you considered as the bird is still there when we see the real bird flying in front of the falling cliff.

I know. Thanks for new stills.
They will be processed too, as soon a have time

And the changes made to the image are too exaggerated, the image did not get enhanced, it only got worse.

I did it on purpose.
It's damaging to the rest of the picture, but the targeted object gets clearer.
Also there are other reasons for exaggeration, beacuse there is plenty more going on here,
but the bird/orb
Exaggeration helps with the things that are well hidden.

Here is the second still i wanted to post, without enhancing:


Next is the enhanced-enlarged detail.
I told you, lot more is going on here.

In this image we can see the flying object we are talking about.
No enhancements.


And here is your BIRD???????????????


In case you still don't get it, here it is enlarged more:

now that is one STRANGE looking bird, in my opinion.

Here's one more enlargement:


The same one, take two:

And it is those things (beings?) that stick out outside the light/orb,
that were popping in and out, constantly.

That's why you had illusion of flapping wings.
Me too, at the beginning.

Similar stuff has been seen and analyzed in many different videos.

There is a lot more anomalies in this video, which i will try to present in time.
Some of them are really weird, like something is projected all over the scenery,
still have to do more work on those, to see what it is.

As soon as possible i will enhance and enlarge the second BIRD? too.

reply to post by Krokodil


What exactly are YOU trying to do, It is amazing that so many members on here resort to filters because they think it enhances the image.

You are just showing everyone one how naive and in experienced you are regarding digital imaging, you are looking at an object a few pixels across and enlarging it sorry but that does NOT show more detail it only shows pixels and then you fall into the trap that every other ufo site on the internet does they think if they add a filter effect their audience will assume it's enhanced just

reply to post by Krokodil


You might be onto something.
Other than the low quality of the video, many are blind to see the orb.
Unless we get a better video of this, many won't believe

Rather than argue about birds, we should see this for what it is.

Nothing is as it seems.
Unless we open our eyes, they'll overtake us.
Till then, who knows.
Surely we will see.

reply to post by ChuckNasty


Look at it full screen you can see flapping wings

What exactly are YOU trying to do, It is amazing that so many members on here resort to filters because they think it enhances the image.

NOT A SINGLE FILTER or any other trick was used in processing.

JUST basics:
brightness/contrast
curves
levels
color balance.
enlarging
I didn't touch the part of Photoshop where it says: FILTERS.

In fact, if you use Photoshop and process the same video still that i did,
by using the same tools that i mentioned
you will get the same results.

It is your brain that cannot accept what it sees.
It will fight it till the end,
because everything you know then - changes from the root.

Look at it full screen you can see flapping wings

Well that is what i want, give it to me.
Grab your super modern big OLED screenshot or whatever and post it!
I will be grateful, cos i also want to find what it is.

More of the bottom orb too, it is too pixelated, but from what i saw it's the same thing.
I explained already what is making the illusion of flapping.

I welcome any attempt from anyone, to locate the highest resolution there is.
And post it. I will process it.
Anyone from France here?

As i said before, convince me it's a bird, a i will say i was wrong. It's a bird
Don't post pictures of birds now, post the picturs of those objects..

reply to post by Krokodil


I used the term filters as a GENERIC term as not everyone is familiar with photoshop etc. They can see the image was altered and with no real point because you don't really know what you are doing

This was the SECOND BIRD at the 1:02 as posted above.

reply to post by Krokodil


Here is a link to a clearer version of the video watch full screen see them wings flap!!!

www.bfmtv.com...

A quick screen capture of the second BIRD



Oh look WINGS!!!

Well, sure, it looks just like a bird in that higher resolution and less compressed video -- but have you looked at it when it's "enhanced"?! I didn't think so...

Originally posted by wmd_2008
reply to post by ChuckNasty

 

Look at it full screen you can see flapping wings

Re'read' my post and you'll see I concur with your post.

Birds - nothing but birds.

reply to post by Krokodil


Hmm. Could be birds...could be something else, though admittedly I'm no expert. Interesting video nonetheless.

Edit: Oh look above me. It is birds

Originally posted by Krokodil

As i said before, convince me it's a bird, a i will say i was wrong. It's a bird
Don't post pictures of birds now, post the picturs of those objects..

edit on 30-7-2013 by Krokodil because: grammatics

Here you go in case you missed it



Bottom edge of screen the bird and again the link to the clearer version of the video.

www.bfmtv.com...

Now I know you have logged on a few times since I first posted the image and you now seem to want to avoid the thread that tells the other members a great deal!!!

Thanks for the clearer video, wmd. I think that shows without a doubt it is a bird. Anyone saying otherwise at this point is just arguing for the sake of arguing.