It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Harte
Originally posted by Druscilla
The problem I have with a bronze age culture interacting and having trade relations with Pre-columbian America is that Pre-Columbian Amerians were STILL using stone aged tools when the Spanish arrived.
Were there regular or even brief contact between the new world and the old world there would have been some trade not only in material goods, but also technologies like bronze smithing.
Do we see Bronze age style weapons in the new world?
NO.
We see lots of flint knives and clubs studded with obsidian and such, but, no bronze swords or other similar that would have come at a huge advantage in the war-like cultures of South America.
Let us also note that, shortly after the arrival of Europeans, literally millions of South American natives succumbed to disease - almost certainly smallpox, primarily.
Where's the evidence for the big die-off from Pre-Columbian contact in antiquity? Why weren't the survivors of that catastrophe more immune to these diseases, the way Europeans were?
Harte
Originally posted by stormcell
Originally posted by Harte
Originally posted by Druscilla
The problem I have with a bronze age culture interacting and having trade relations with Pre-columbian America is that Pre-Columbian Amerians were STILL using stone aged tools when the Spanish arrived.
Were there regular or even brief contact between the new world and the old world there would have been some trade not only in material goods, but also technologies like bronze smithing.
Do we see Bronze age style weapons in the new world?
NO.
We see lots of flint knives and clubs studded with obsidian and such, but, no bronze swords or other similar that would have come at a huge advantage in the war-like cultures of South America.
Let us also note that, shortly after the arrival of Europeans, literally millions of South American natives succumbed to disease - almost certainly smallpox, primarily.
Where's the evidence for the big die-off from Pre-Columbian contact in antiquity? Why weren't the survivors of that catastrophe more immune to these diseases, the way Europeans were?
Harte
Europeans lived in high density cities and towns polluted with coal smoke, literally threw c**p out of the windows with no sewers or fresh water, lived with animals and livestock in their buildings. Add to that rats, cats, tics and fleas, and the whole of Europe was a pandemic waiting to happen. The only benefit was that immune systems of Europeans were more advanced that other world populations. Even now, it can be fatal for Europeans to go off and live in some isolated far-flung Pacific beach paradise for a couple of decades and then return to Europe.
Originally posted by myn4m3
Some of you guys might find this interesting:
It's from the History channel show America Unearthed, where they say the summer solstice line runs directly through America's Stonehenge (Salem, New Hampshire - USA) to Stonehenge in England and then further on to run exactly through Beirut Lebanon - home of the ancient Phoenicians. Maybe further proof to support the Phoenicians were once in the US.
Also mentioned in the show is the Phoenician coin with the map (of the USA?) on the bottom.
Really great History channel show btw. One of my favorites. For those with an interest in this topic, my advice is don't miss this show!
edit on 27-7-2013 by myn4m3 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Druscilla
The problem I have with a bronze age culture interacting and having trade relations with Pre-columbian America is that Pre-Columbian Amerians were STILL using stone aged tools when the Spanish arrived.
Originally posted by myn4m3
Some of you guys might find this interesting:
It's from the History channel show America Unearthed, where they say the summer solstice line runs directly through America's Stonehenge (Salem, New Hampshire - USA) to Stonehenge in England and then further on to run exactly through Beirut Lebanon - home of the ancient Phoenicians. Maybe further proof to support the Phoenicians were once in the US.
Also mentioned in the show is the Phoenician coin with the map (of the USA?) on the bottom.
Really great History channel show btw. One of my favorites. For those with an interest in this topic, my advice is don't miss this show!
edit on 27-7-2013 by myn4m3 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by anonentity
reply to post by Hanslune
Thanks for that....Well it wasn't the Canaries, because when the Spanish got there and colonised. The people were stone age and thought they were the only people left on earth after a deluge, and It doesn't have rivers. The Modus Oporendi of the Phoenicians, was unhurried and fairly systematic. They would only sail "Summer seas", and would stop plant and repair over the winter. Then leave a settlement to set up trade if required. Hanno's fleet was originally 60 ships.
Originally posted by demongoat
Considering the discription this sounds like atlantis not america, atlantis is called an island.
It is also beyond the pillars and would be closer than america to africa.
Originally posted by charlyv
reply to post by anonentity
The Google Earth work in the video was bogus. You can make a Great Circle route between any 2 points on Earth. They were using linear lines (2D) in Google Earth, projected on a 3D representation of a flat surface earth. True, you can plot a linear line in that mode, and between ANY 2 POINTS and then turn it into a Great Circle plot, but anything in between and beyond the 2 points scribed in a Great Circle line and the linear line will not correlate. The assumption that the line went on to intercept the Phoenician empire was absolutely bogus, and really goes to Germany. Bad Geometry, Bad analysis, and the result is a bogus program where you cannot use any of it's discoveries, because there are none.
Originally posted by LABTECH767
Wonderful thread, thank you.
The races of the world are not so isolated as we sometimes believe and it is possible that America was visited many time's by African and European culture's as well as the possibility that the American peoples themselves may have at times have has sufficiently sophisticated craft to visit Europe and Africa, a hundred years before Columbus the chines left there stone anchors in san Francisco bay or so I have read and the remains of a Buddhist monastery were supposedly found and then covered up in the Andes.
Still the Romans were bad enough but the Carthaginian's used to buy children to sacrifice to there goddess.
All told, the University of Washington anthropologist George Quimby estimated, between 500 and 1750 CE some 187 junks drifted from Japan to the Americas. The number of drifts increased dramatically after 1603—thanks, ironically, to the efforts of a xenophobic regime to keep foreign influences out of Japan and the Japanese in.