Anti-Gravity: Solved! (not kidding)

Fantastic claims with no proof? Check

Patronising posts where the OP is smarter than everyone else? Check

Some made up nonsense that only the OP can "visualize"? Check

Pretty sure you are not a new member and you have posted on here before under several names. One of which was Savvy who also claimed the same things as you do. Oh, except his anti gravity machine was tested on tomatoes

If you can demonstrate ANY of which you claim, i shall unreservedly apologise and withdraw these comments, but as it stands i think you are either deluding yourself or you are a fantasist who tries this sort of thread every few months.

nope wrong guy. did savvy claim to have attained samadhi?

look i understand. to everyone who is here and a skeptic. u have every right to be. there have been many attempts but each falling short of the goal. and then, a nobody, comes and posts this on a conspiracy website and all the other factors which make this claim very hard to take without a grain of salt. and that's fine.

but let me state that tesla was one of my greatest mentors as a child. and his observations in nature which led to his contributions in science led me to observe nature my self to fully understand all the concepts behind hidden science, the fibonacci sequence etc. i didnt just learn from the research of great minds, i also went to their original sources to learn from the same medium as they.

this is all based on something i like to call 'natural science'. taking conventional scientific observations and coupling them with natural science to construct new applications. the thread wasnt supposed to focus on my claim. but was to focus on advice on how to proceed with development and making it public.

believe me, i would make nothing public other than flicking a switch, watching my silent engine warmup, emit a light source and lift off the ground. u can then inspect it to see if i have string tied to it anywhere. but because it is so soon, u risk a great deal of anxiety.

fastest way for me to get this done would be with full access to a lab with the required equipment. which i think would be alot better. but i should get a working prototype of some sort built on my own. it will just take time. i shall need about $1000 usd (minimum) in materials and equipment for monitoring outputs. the actual engine i can probably construct for maybe within 100usd. these are all loose figures. the better the lab the better the results. i live in the caribbean. so it's going to take me some time to put aside the necessary funds out of my monthly paycheck, which will set back my pc upgrade which im saving $3000usd for now. im sorry, but it doesnt seem like i can have a prototype ready next week or even next month in any way.

so far the suggestions presented i can work with. it's just going to take time. never did i expect a marketing person, or an investor out of this thread. just trying to work with what i have to determine what is acceptable to be presented. it is a seeking advice on how to proceed thread. but in it's own way is also an announcement.

also im still awake exploring my thoughts, so it looks like im taking a day off tomorrow.. or should i say today.

reply to post by filledcup


Savvy claimed all sorts of things to be honest. Half his posts were nonsense, half his posts were either abusive or flirting, depending if he was replying to male or female posters. Then, when the female posters rebuffed his flirting and asked serious questions about his anti grav, he became abusive to them too.

Look, if your not him, then fair enough, I wish you well with your experiments, but i would also caution you against outlandish claims with nothing to back them up. Only time will tell, but i honestly look forward to you demonstrating even the slightest bit of what you claim. Or, in all honesty, more likely disappearing when the smarter members than me start asking serious questions of your claims.

reply to post by expatwhite


meh.. that savvy sounds like a joker. why dont u take a look through my profile to see what kind of nonesense im into

but no i am not him, and i dont joke. i understand what u mean by outlandish claims. i suspect any smart atsers would have to be quite careful. it would affect their credibility of being smart if the experiment pulls off as i envisioned. and it should. but either way, i wont be answering to any questions regarding my claim without the prototype.

when that is done i will answer more questions. by then the core application and engineering design should be patented with accurate figures for replication.

Originally posted by filledcup
reply to post by expatwhite

 

either way, i wont be answering to any questions regarding my claim without the prototype.

when that is done i will answer more questions. by then the core application and engineering design should be patented with accurate figures for replication.

oh oh. All sorts of alarm bells just gone off. That is EXACTLY what Savvy did under all his different guises. makes a post with lavish claims, then refuses to answer any questions on it. If you didn't want questions then why would you make a post about it??? Why not just build your "anti grav" device in secret, patent it and then tell the world, either for huge commercial gain or for pure altruism?

Posting claims on here then refusing to answer questions about it has been done before. Badly. This now seems like just another one of those threads. Sorry, this is just wasting peoples time.

reply to post by expatwhite


well i thank those who did for their suggestions and offers. they have helped me to focus on a path to development that i feel comfortable working with as a goal. unfortunately, i cannot discuss too much of the details on a public forum so that's a no go. it took a great deal of study and so many other things to see this. i shall not let it go easily, but it will be released.

Well, funny story. My friend and I started our own company with the idea of making table-top fusion devices - no one took us seriously, until other corporations started stealing our idea.

So expect revolutionary new advances in table-top fusion in the next decade! :-)

A lot of times scientists like you actually know more than those that work for companies, and the university scientists are usually highly traditional and therefore not open to new ideas. But the larger corporate culture, although it is interested in edgy science, can also be somewhat treacherous unless approached in the correct manner.

Sometimes my business partner would go into an area where the government was working on a top-secret project and know what they were working on, and make suggestions.

Originally posted by darkbake
Well, funny story. My friend and I started our own company with the idea of making table-top fusion devices - no one took us seriously, until other corporations started stealing our idea.

So expect revolutionary new advances in table-top fusion in the next decade! :-)

A lot of times scientists like you actually know more than those that work for companies, and the university scientists are usually highly traditional and therefore not open to new ideas. But the larger corporate culture, although it is interested in edgy science, can also be somewhat treacherous unless approached in the correct manner.

Sometimes my business partner would go into an area where the government was working on a top-secret project and know what they were working on, and make suggestions.

edit on 15-7-2013 by darkbake because: (no reason given)

edit on 15-7-2013 by darkbake because: (no reason given)

table top fusion u say? as in a power source? how much power? any links to information regarding it?

i was thinking i will look more in depth at john hutchinson's crystal based battery for powering the craft. combining all that he has presented with the knowledge of ancient batteries (which he has also done). now it seems that these tabletop fusion devices contain crystals in them. not yet sure how they work but will analyse it later. obviously an interstellar craft needs to generate electricity from something other than petrol. so after i get the antigravity effect demonstrated.. then would come the task of designing the battery, or powersource that would be implemented. it is somewhere in there in crystalline structures. possibly having to do with light refraction and particle velocities?

ok dont want to get sidetracked. but thanks for your post. it may turn out to be helpful.

reply to post by filledcup


It is actually table-top fusion that uses some power, but still generates neutrons - which can be useful for certain nuclear interactions.

reply to post by filledcup


"I've always believed sound/frequency to be key."

I think the ancient Egyptians would agree with you. There is some speculation out there that implies the pyramids were constructed using some kind of sound wave levitation technology.

Also check this out if you have a moment.

rense.com...

This dude had some interesting abilities!

reply to post by filledcup
If there is any truth to your claims then you will be paid into silence or killed... You should take these claims seriously. This planet is anchored down by the Petro dollar system and the many Factions that profit from it. Your invention destabilizes the Petro dollar system there for it is not allowed to exist.

Dont forget all the NSA leaks.... If you are legit you have just been flagged by the system. That's what PRISM is actually used for. Keeping the many aspects that keep our fake stalled reality running.

Be careful.

reply to post by filledcup


Needless to say the first step to proving your ideas work is an operational prototype.
I would be sure to document EVERYTHING by video. From the first steps of construction until the successful test flights.
The next step would be to begin to load the engine with inert "payloads". Also document these flights until you are able to overload the models working capacity. Being sure to make note of the radio between the power input to the load lifted and to what heights.
After, and only after, this you should be ready to unvail you work to the rest of the world.
I would also do this by several simultanious releases over several media outlets. This may just be may own paranoia showing through, but such things can only be protected by "sudden over exposure" to insure your own best self interests.

reply to post by Arbitrageur

It's a common tactic of charlatans to tell us what they are going to do at some point in the future.

As i like things to be equal, in all fairness this is exactly what most people do...politicians tell us what they are going to do in the future a lot too..Movie studios tell us what their upcoming releases will be, or what their next project will be based on..hitech corporations will tell us the same thing too...next year we will be releasing blah blah and so on. Even everyday people in life will often say similar things, 'I'll be doing X or Y next year', 'I'll do it tomorrow' etc.

Even TV listings are telling you this before the programme is aired, so they're doing the same thing if you think about it.

So really...not only 'charlatans' use this...virtually everyone does, meaning releasing a few tantalising details to whet the appetite for more information is not the mark of a fraud...even if there is an actual fraud.

Originally posted by MysterX
..hitech corporations will tell us the same thing too...next year we will be releasing blah blah and so on. ...

Even TV listings are telling you this before the programme is aired, so they're doing the same thing if you think about it.

The difference is the high tech corporation has probably already made at least a prototype when they tell you that. The TV guide telling you the show will be aired is listing a show that has already been produced. So you made my point...the examples you listed are of non-charlatans who already have tangible things.

The charlatans don't have anything tangible.

This is interesting, recent (5-15-13 ) article on, " Dr. Eric W. Davis, formerly a contract research physicist at NASA's Breakthrough Propulsion Project, which ran from 1996 through to 2002, gave a lecture in 2010 where he responded to the question of UFOs as they pertain to potential physics for traversable wormholes, warp drives, and anti-gravity." source :www.theufochronicles.com...

Talks about everybody's favorite mystery man, Bob Bigilow, and skin walker ranch, aliens coming through portals
anti gravity..

He finally commented on the matter of anti-gravity, "...we have anti-gravity in Einstein's General Theory of Relativity. ... There are aspects of anti-gravity, the properties of negative vacuum energy, that would create a repulsive force that allows something to levitate up. And UFOs do exhibit that."

My favorite is

]." He described two events that took place at the NIDS Utah Ranch of, "...one scientist and one researcher seeing a wormhole, what looked like a wormhole, with a creature crawling through." In the second event, "...the ranch owners had seen an opening in the sky in broad daylight with a triangular craft that came through it." Dr. Davis then compared these observations with known wormhole physics. "...that's an example of data that indicates a wormhole involved. Geometry tells you what a wormhole looks like when it intersects our space. It appears as [an intensely bright] point of light and then, as the intersection gets larger and larger, it opens up and you begin to see the hole." At that point, he noted, objects could traverse the wormhole.

Lots of mysteries with what is know and not known. Do billionairs like Mr. Bigilow have the secrets? I don't know. But, its fun to read about and wonder.

reply to post by randomtangentsrme
Random, I think we all need to take a look at what is meant by engine. An engine is simply a device which produces some work. Nobody said an engine automatically is a mechanical device or that it requires combustion or moving parts for that matter.

I write software and have created many "engines" responsible for getting something done. We also use database engines regularly. The original use of engine predating the industrial revolution seems to have been lost on a lot of people. Charles Babbage devised an 'Analytical Engine' back in the mid-1800's, before steam power came into every-day use which brought forth the term Steam Engine, later to be replaced by the gasoline and diesel engines. As long as the device he creates can do work, he is free to call it an engine.

So with that said, I can't wait to see his anti-gravity engine whether it has moving parts or not.

reply to post by filledcup

but let me state that tesla was one of my greatest mentors as a child.

Otis is that you.

look i understand. to everyone who is here and a skeptic. u have every right to be.

No just simply not believing in what you believe, no skepticism required as your discussing your beliefs or that is what you are stating when you say "I believe I have figured out".

meh.. that savvy sounds like a joker.

Do some of your jokes need being brought up?

What is your cup filled with? the fumes from whatever it is clouding rational thought and sending you into the league of extraordinary ATS posters claiming anything from from A to Z, well done.

entertainment +


Supply the goods and not your beliefs then the seriousness of your claims can be verified,

However as history has shown here on ATS your a dime a dozen.

I would recommend getting yourself along to your nearest university and discuss it with somebody in the appropriate department, if you're truly onto something, they'll almost certainly make research facilities available to you.

Originally posted by Painterz
I would recommend getting yourself along to your nearest university and discuss it with somebody in the appropriate department, if you're truly onto something, they'll almost certainly make research facilities available to you.

I can almost guarantee that the OP will NOT take that offer up. In fact, i would almost bet money that he thinks he is too clever for anyone at the university. Seen all this before.

Posts about an anti grav machine that only he can understand or visualise, but states categorically he will NOT answer questions on it? Why post on here then? Fantasist.

Originally posted by filledcup
reply to post by expatwhite

 

when that is done i will answer more questions. by then the core application and engineering design should be patented with accurate figures for replication.

It will take you a lot more time and a LOT more money than what you have stated to get any sort of patent that will cover all aspects of anything on the scale of what you are speaking. It will be years before you can get that alone done.

As for your idea....it is just that.....and idea. That is how everything started until someone actually built their idea. So until you build it...it is fictional. Good luck getting a fictional idea patented....you have to build a functioning prototype to have a complete patent...other than that it is just an idea patent that is available to anyone and everyone to expound on and steal.

Oh....and as a side note, a mentor would imply you actually worked directly with someone...so you worked directly with Tesla as a child?