The Language of Vampyr

a reply to: IndieA

I still have to look at what you posted earlier.

I have found with fear, RV'ing, and even seeing stuff in general. What one meets 'out there' is often terrifying in the sense one does nor know if it will harm us, and more importantly: not knowing how it might harm us. We are not familiar with how it thinks or behaves. There is also the gut reaction of meeting something totally alien.

My background includes learning martial arts when younger. One learns to stand one's ground against bigger and stronger opponents. I think that is important in RV'ing. Yes one "grows a pair" learning martial arts.

So one might consider the creators of a remote viewing device, a BCI (Brain Computer Interface), would want to mitigate the fear response in the RV'er.

Does Kundalini teach one how to control their fear response, and if so how?

I dunno, I haven't gone down that path. One should keep in mind that the yogi doesn't have a patent on 'installing non-standard intelligences' in the human body. A few thousand years ago, the world was a very different place, and it stands to reason that others also knew about kundalini type principals. FL does write a lot about the mystic side that they keep to themselves. I have wondered what techniques they discuss in private.


NullusSpecialis AKA NobodySpecial268

a reply to: fireslinger369

I never stopped thinking about the parasite. People's behavior these days can't be explained away solely by what I call rolling trauma. Something else is going on, a spiritual / soul infestation. Convincing others to give their intuition up to the machine.

I can't put my finger on a single cause, either. But I don't think it is an infestation of anything. However, FL's current series articles discussing dreams may have something to do with the current affairs.

There was the part about blue screens changing the human brain discussed here, the dampening the ability to dream I think it was. Now we have the human BCI (Brain Computer Interface) with what looks to be an organic based aspect.

So below is a lecture by Michael Persinger of his work with RV (Remote Viewing. It is rather interesting, and I think it is pertinent here. The Lecture is titled No More Secrets.

A quick biography:

Michael A. Persinger (June 26, 1945 – August 14, 2018) was an American-Canadian professor of psychology at Laurentian University, a position he had held from 1971 until his death in 2018. His best-known hypotheses include the temporal lobes of the human brain as the central correlate for mystical experiences, subtle changes in geomagnetic activity as mediators of parapsychological phenomena, the tectonic strain within the Earth's crust as the source of luminous phenomena attributed to unidentified aerial objects, and the importance of specific quantifications for energy (10−20 Joules), photon flux density (picoWatt per meter squared), and small shifts in magnetic field intensities (picoTesla to nanoTesla range) for integrating cellular activity as well as human thought with universal phenomena.


Source: Wikipedia Michael Persinger

It is an hour long, and includes a Q&A. Within the Q&A he has a few things to say about the effects of computer screens.



In the video, Michael Persinger talks along the lines of a natural resonance that is essential to RV'ing and a lot of other things. In particular, how the brain works. Persinger found RV'ing ability was scrambled by utilising a couple of solenoids to create a disruptive resonance.

My thoughts are that if one were to create a RV device, the creators might want to stop the natural RV'ing that many people can do. That might be connected to computer screens, blue lights and similar things. Scrambling certain local natural frequencies probably would unsettle many people. Depends on how widespread it is.

That said, If the BCI becomes widespread, they create a collective consciousness of sorts. Presumably, an AI would be in that. In the latest FL article On Artificial Dreams The SyntheMentia Dream Fabricator. We see the fabrication of dreams.

If the ability to dream, and I am sure this is so, is the basis of RV'ing, intuition, clairvoyance and similar things, this is not a good thing.

Also in Persinger's lecture is the observation that the phenomenon, as UFO people call it, has dropped off in activity. My own view on this is the very real possibility that human interference in the EM (Electro-Magnetic) spectrum is having an effect on the phenomenon itself. By creating a BCI interface that allows conscious contact with non-human intellegences such as UFOs, Orbs and so on, one might want to make sure no one else can communicate with them too.


NullusSpecialis AKA NobodySpecial268

originally posted by: IndieA
a reply to: ksihkahe

2. Lion's Mane mushrooms

I've heard of this.

I don't know that any of them are needed. I think the most important thing is probably intent. A journal, a few minutes of thought before going to sleep. These probably would help most people remember more. Quality sleep probably helps too, but sleep disturbances can trigger altered states as well.

Lots of people may have sleep disorders that might inhibit dream recall. I don't know. Everyone I know that has used a journal has seemed to remember more while they were sticking with it. I do it on an irregular basis.

I have also found that lucidity doesn't come very often, and when it does, I almost always seem to wake up shortly after.

Do you have any tips that can help a person maintain lucidity?

Oh that's easy.

You just have to forget how to wake up.

I kid.

Imagine that gaining spontaneous lucidity in a dream is actually rather like waking up. But you do it instantly, maybe in a really odd place, you don't remember where you just were, you don't even remember who you are... then you're awake and in the moment.

It's a shock, either a good one or a bad one... depending on your level of preparation. If you get through the excitement without firing up your nervous system, I would guess, then maybe you will extend your time?

There seem to be levels of lucidity. I don't know how much control is possible over the levels in the spontaneous events. There are dreams when I've been lucid, but I allowed the dream to progress and focused on retaining the memory. I don't have a large sample set because the frequency, even when doing lucid dream protocols, isn't practical for me. I still get them, but I have switched to what are usually called wake-induced lucid dreams. Sleeping lucid dreams are just happy accidents now.

I don't know if the protocols out there for wake-induced lucid dreams are really thorough. Some of the Gateway Experience tapes seem to focus on expanding the retention of consciousness into altered states. I didn't listen to any advanced topics, but I know Monroe got a little weird later in life. If the goal of meditation is finding the void, I would say my goal now is finding the edge of the void and peeking over the edge. Not in a doomy way, the void meaning sleep or the absence of thought.

I just exploit my natural biorhythm. When I get pretty sleepy, I sometimes will get into a comfortable reclined position and just force myself to stay awake. My body is telling me it wants to shut down, so I give it the means and then force myself to remain awake. I noticed how well it worked on accident. I was getting really tired during the day at one point, not sure why it happened. I got tired of it (ha!) and started just allowing myself a brief eye rest rather than dozing off. I slipped into lucid dreams spontaneously a few times while doing that and eventually connected the dots.

So, I just practice when I feel like it. I've had periods of more intense discipline. I'll probably try to extend that out at some point and see how much I can learn staying at it longer. I can do it with decent success rates whenever I want, but duration is not always impressive. Extending the duration is slow going unless you're doing a routine, disciplined, pushing a little.

Once maintained lucidity is achieved, what do you suggest the dreamer do?

I take no more stake in what they do in a lucid dream as I do when they wake up in the morning. I often just let the dream progress. I'll sometimes try to exert minor control, disrupt the flow, or try to break physics. Breaking physics has been an instant banhammer in the recent past. This is just with spontaneous dreams while sleeping.

I think it helps to already have a very automatic plan, one you don't have to think about too deeply. I think many of the rules are self-imposed, even if it's at a subconscious level.

It works when I don't have to think about it too much, is the best I can offer. You have to be in the zone and it's hard to keep your finger on that.

As far as Huperzina A goes, anyone reading this should know that there are possible side effects with this substance as well as possible drug interactions. It has a variety of uses including treating nerve damage, and can be bought as a supplement.

How are you suggesting it helps with dreaming and how much, how often, would you recommend? And please feel free to message me if you prefer.

I'm not suggesting anything. I just stated that it has been shown even more effective than Galantamine in some areas of therapeutic interest. That's just a neutral fact based on academic studies.

I don't think they really know exactly why these work anyway, including the prescription. They seem to improve cognition in people with things like Alzheimer's, but they couldn't tell you why it doesn't work in the cases where it doesn't. They seem to understand the main mechanism and biochemical action, but they're missing a lot of nuance about consciousness itself. All of my research on it is a way back, so I'm not actively following. I'm comfortable with general physiology and biochemistry, enough to follow a little... but I'm only giving my impression of the situation from memory.

Hey all! Just a heads-up that there's a growing Discord community of almost 500 members dedicated to analyzing FL articles. Our focus is on exploring the encryption methods and uncovering the meanings within the texts, rather than speculating about the identities of those involved. Feel free to join us here: discord.gg...


edit: DIRENE - you're invited too 😏

What's the meaning of this one?

Look at them. They like to hack the sun and other light sources, even fire. They plug wires to feed their buildings, spaces, furniture, and often themselves. Light is their energy and food. Their heroes are a plant-like archaic species, which they archive and preserve in transparent museum-like boxes, with the attention and respect that is typically reserved for jewelry, precious stones, or art. This place sounds unfamiliar, even scary. And yet, you don’t care whether it is good, bad, popular, or trendy. You must find it now. An entire civilization wiped out by a single event upset. Unless the single event upset was the civilization itself...

forgottenlanguages-full.forgottenlanguages.org...

a reply to: fireslinger369

I still haven't figured out what they're referring to there. Admittedly, I've not spend much time brainstorming.

It makes me think of things like lichens and cyanobacteria, but I don't get the museum-like transparent boxes. We have limited numbers of species that are archaic and plant-like (which seems to exclude true plants?) that are also macroscopically visible. Perhaps the quote isn't about humans or whoever is speaking is using incorrect/unfamiliar terminology.

There has been a steady pace of interesting articles recently.

A look back at the "rice fields" since time immemorial.

"God does so communicate with men, and in more ways than one. You cannot deny that he sometimes warns a man to mend his ways by means of a dream or an illness; the man gets the message, acts accordingly and his life is spared. God does respond to people in dreams, though they can certainly be dreadful dreams."

"She once had a dream in which an angel informed her that she was living in a fool’s paradise if she imagined that her righteousness was a guarantee against ruin: God, who found fault with his angels, certainly did not recognize any such category as righteous women."

For God so loved the World he sent his only begotten Son.

"Throughout the ancient Near East, including Israel, dreams were recognized as a means of divine communication. The science of dream interpretation was especially well developed in Egypt and in the rest of the ancient Near East, but no one could interpret the meaning of the Invisible City of Drizza (Drizel or Drizeel in the texts from Elyam)."

Tomorrowland

For once be a tool, fool!

The Alphabet apparently had no more interpretations about this City. Rightfully so.

Sauce here NS: Sauce

a reply to: ksihkahe

Yea, time / energy is scarce these days. We're all just holding on.

I also thought they could be referencing an organism (thinking parasitic), but who knows.

Just finished Direne's latest on dreams, and I'm all caught up. Fascinating articles lately for sure.

I'm thinking that these Yuga cycles (of which we're clearly at 'cosmic rock bottom') are being run by the dreamers.

If this is a reality of fractal shells, then the dreamers are trying to discover themselves through the dreamed. Just as many are trying to discover themselves through the digital life / technosphere designed by an ETI. While some utilize technology, but are more directly trying to understand the game they're already in, at a much deeper level. That subset would be us.

How I see it, the dreamed would only exist, if the dreamers were trying to fulfill a need.

"While it is not an accident that the king saw cows rather than sheep, for the latter played a very minor role in the Egyptian economy while cows were abundant and important, it is an absolute anomaly he also saw a rice field whose description matches word-by-word that of the rice fields reported by our team of dreamers at XViS."

Where is XViS Direne? Do they pay very handsomely?

Why is Trump looking so sure over here?

x.com...

Anyways, congratulations to my team!!! MonkaS

a reply to: ksihkahe

Wow, the good ones continue to be churned out. Have been learning a lot. Read the latest tonight.

Keep it coming FL, it's a breath of fresh air, compared to the suffocating circus we all have to deal with.

But I've noticed more consistent typos lately, the latest even being in the title. Can't help but feel a sense of urgency, like they're rushing for some reason.

What do you make of it?

a reply to: fireslinger369

I can't say much about typos. I read and reread my posts multiple times and still miss typos all the time. When I landed on the page just now it was in the middle of one of my posts and I just noticed another one. Lol.

The Internet of Things isn't discussed with much depth most of the time in any media. I can't really remember what any mainstream articles said about it. Probably marketing how great it is.

People are giving their watches, refrigerators, tablets, cars, and all kinds of other devices access to all kinds of data and they mostly have no idea how vulnerable they are. The market for that data isn't developed to full commercial scale like the rest of the digital space. Most of the stuff reported about hacks involving the IoT has been pretty low impact in the grand scheme of things. It's yet to be fully exploited, but if the trend toward putting a wireless computer in everything continues it will be eventually.

Printers that order their own ink aren't a convenience or consumer value, they're just a cheap way to get repeat business for the company making them.

The AI bubble is about to burst in the stock market. They can't sell chips because there's no massive commercial demand. They've got orders based on pipe dreams. All the free AI generation and the free chat bots have been a wonderdul marketing tool for something that has no place in commerce yet on the scale they seem to allude to. Nvidia is tied to fraud, I have no doubt. Open-AI is sucking in funding based on some demagogue they're trying to make the Steve Jobs of AI. It's all fluff, a house of cards.

An unrestricted AI would be a wonderful research assistant, a very powerful tool if used properly, but it still can't replace creativity and intuition. AI isn't being used for your benefit, or at least not in many ways I can conceive of. Not at scsle.

I like the idea of an AI whistleblower, but with a great deal of skepticism.

I could probably recruit like 20 people to train an AI to spot the sale of non-existent derivatives. It might even be possible from strictly public data to some degree, but it would be behind whatever reporting timelines there are. It would probably collapse the system if they shut it all down. But... you know how that old saying goes, you can't make an omelet without breaking some hedge funds.

It will be interesting how things unfold.

a reply to: ksihkahe

It really is a mess, especially when paired with the recent bombshell (alluded to in other articles) about cryptography. I don’t like the guy, but remember Tucker saying that the CIA told him they read his Signal messages. I suppose it’s still better than nothing, since as FL mentioned, only a select few are in the know.

FL intel hints at our technosphere being created for us, to domesticate and control us. What I’ve been wondering, is if IoT itself was always a decentralized storage project. It must be compromised from the get-go, to have such backdoors and hidden code snippets everywhere, right? It would be harder to implement those things in a pre-existing system, which would have to essentially be hacked first.

AI is definitely taking us down hard. Talk about a post-truth world, sheesh. Not only do many people no longer care about the corruption (not that they ever really did), but I’ve noticed human intelligence dropping significantly. The content that gets sent to us these days is pure garbage, no other way to put it. The only one that I use, is the Brave search results AI. Seems fairly decent and non-biased. But man are we in trouble.

True, the AI pipe-dream fluff bubble is on its way out, just like NFTs. But in my opinion (with the help of Solari, Catherine Austin Fitts), it’s unfortunately a digital control grid, that’s all being unwittingly subsidized by us. All of big tech is in on it. Look who created Microsoft, and why haven’t they been patching their CVEs? You see that hardware level Apple backdoor several months ago, that they swept under their shiny propaganda rug? Look at Pelosi, and her stake in Nvidia. We can see where the so called ruling class’s loyalties are. Both sides are building it, left and right. And the control grid reaches into space, when looking at Musk’s subsidized Tesla, Starlink, and the missing trillions that vanished into space, quite literally. Can we all stop paying taxes too?

The most unsettling piece, is the suppressed realm of research / findings around bioengineering, and all the weird self assembling structures being found in our blood. We’ve all been compromised; I saw a silent geoengineering drone spraying over my house a few days ago. It’s not just the injection. It’s the food, water, air, it’s everywhere. And the nano metals are clearly being electromagnetically steered, to manipulate weather conditions. It’s all part of the control grid.

My thought experiment is, what happens when they, whoever they are, begin storing snippets of code within our biology, to extend their secrets network? Perhaps it’s already being done. Will they claim to technically own us, since to them, we’re perceived as nodes, carrying proprietary property?

The bright side is, if you know how, you can continually detox / deactivate the nanotech. It’s all based around staying as human as you can. I have years of trial and error on the alternative health side, and have my own thing going. Even influenced some family who listens, but damn, it’s still not easy. Forever swimming upstream. However, I found that approaching it from the health side, is far easier than talking about nanotech.

As David A. Hughes puts it, this is an Omniwar. It’s a war on everyone and everything, coming from many different angles. Fifth generation hybrid warfare. Solari is a paid sub, but I highly recommend the discussions with Catherine Autstin Fitts and David A. Hughes if you can find them. David says that the digital technocracy is the ruling class’s Achilles heel. And that the Omniwar is won, one individual at a time. I’ve been cleaning up my digital life / seeking alternatives, and living with more integrity / morals for a while now, but his message rekindled some hope.

My biggest concern, is that anthropogenic climate damage and geoengineering will take us out, long before the biotech control grid is fully in place. To say the weather has been weird lately, is a severe understatement.

a reply to: ksihkahe

On the other hand, since the AI bubble is integral to the control grid, it may be here to stay. Some say it's currently proping up our sorry excuse of a debt based economy. We're being played by both sides either way, by an unseen force orchestrating it all:

www.theguardian.com...

Wanted to share David A. Hughes Substack, for whoever is interested in the Omniwar:

dhughes.substack.com...

originally posted by: fireslinger369
a reply to: ksihkahe

On the other hand, since the AI bubble is integral to the control grid, it may be here to stay. Some say it's currently proping up our sorry excuse of a debt based economy. We're being played by both sides either way, by an unseen force orchestrating it all:

www.theguardian.com...

You don't need an AI stock bubble for an AI control grid, just the AI chips.


Source

No idea who those people posting are or even the source they cite about the slow down in advancements, but it's coming.

I'd be interested in seeing what it's really getting used for or what it will be used for at the scale they're expecting it to grow.

Here's a link (github.com...) to a GitHub repository that contains tools for translating and analyzing the content from Forgotten Languages.

FL Spreadsheet Creator: Maps FL words to their English counterparts, creating a foundational dictionary.
FL Translator: Uses the dictionary to translate new texts.

These tools may be useful for those investigating the linguistic aspects of FL.

Direne, if you’re around, would you be able to share some thoughts around this?

Fairly recently, I had a fascinating discussion with a family friend. A self taught engineer. We were discussing C02, and how the current narrative is the opposite of the truth. That we in fact have critically low C02 levels, which can no longer support life. Rather than critically high C02 levels, which require an anti-life net-zero agenda.

I was surprised by the discussion, since he’s on the conventional side, and didn’t know about geoengineering when I brought it up. However, he mentioned that humanity historically possesses greater intellectual capacity during eras of higher C02 levels. The Bronze Age and Renaissance as examples.

Makes a lot of sense. You don’t have to look too far these days, to know what we’re in a severe C02 deficit. Everyone seems to be losing their minds in different ways, and keeping it together is a sheer act of rebellion.

The ruling class do have access to specialized knowledge. And they clearly know that this planet is destroyed beyond repair. Which is why they’ve been illegally laundering money, to build up underground / underwater / space infrastructures. They eventually intend to go off planet, when this planet is in the final stages of its current cycle. Which seems more and more imminent these days.

So then why are they pushing the net-zero agenda? Is it just to establish a carbon credit bio-surveillance based economy, since their current debt based house of cards is coming down? Or is there more to the story?

If net-zero equates to anti-life, it seems to me that an ETI is behind the agenda, attempting to reset the terrain.

In order for life and intelligence to flourish once again, we would be creating more carbon, not finding ways to capture and diminish it.

I remember you saying that we’re at the mercy of cycles within cycles. Does less carbon fit into the end of the Kali Yuga cycle, or is there something else at play?

originally posted by: fireslinger369
Makes a lot of sense. You don’t have to look too far these days, to know what we’re in a severe C02 deficit. Everyone seems to be losing their minds in different ways, and keeping it together is a sheer act of rebellion.

There is certainly a deficit in the commercial availability of CO2 which is having significant impacts of the processed food and drinks industry. There are portions of the global population who are, essentially, addicted to these types of processed products and possibly they will lose their minds adapting to a more nutrient rich diet, but they will feel so much better for it. Assuming they survive the rise in global heating due to the excess of atmospheric CO2.

originally posted by: fireslinger369
The ruling class do have access to specialized knowledge. And they clearly know that this planet is destroyed beyond repair. Which is why they’ve been illegally laundering money, to build up underground / underwater / space infrastructures. They eventually intend to go off planet, when this planet is in the final stages of its current cycle. Which seems more and more imminent these days.

Going off planet for any extended period for human beings is still a long way off our bodies are not equipped to do that, we don't have a substantial solution to that that wouldn't shorten life. Until that obstacle is overcome, anyone who does go off planet for an extended period would not be able to return without needing medical attention and rehabilitation.

They haven't been laundering and hoarding money because they have a grand plan, they've been doing that because they are greedy and that greed compels them towards gross stupity.

There are of course underground facilities, infrastructures, the such-like and those are, in some cases, repositories of specialised knowledge and I do not doubt that some of the mega-rich have paid professionals who have constructed what is promised to be a survival bunker but how long do you think those mega-rich will survive in the brave new world without there being people for them to pay to keep them alive.

There is an awful lot of stupid going round in the world. Almost enough to kill us all off.

originally posted by: fireslinger369
So then why are they pushing the net-zero agenda? Is it just to establish a carbon credit bio-surveillance based economy, since their current debt based house of cards is coming down? Or is there more to the story?

You're asking the wrong questions.

There is a 1978 paper, research carried out by one of the big oil companies for itself. When this paper landed in front of the Board their reaction was to do absolutely nothing. We not absolutely nothing. They did nothing to mitigate the damage that they now knew they were doing but they did everything to prevent that information from being made public.

They went to extraordinary lengths and committed terrible crimes in the process.

originally posted by: fireslinger369
If net-zero equates to anti-life, it seems to me that an ETI is behind the agenda, attempting to reset the terrain.

In order for life and intelligence to flourish once again, we would be creating more carbon, not finding ways to capture and diminish it.

Intelligence is flourishing, adversity and necessity are the Mother of all invention after all but as you and your friend ably demonstrate the want to believe in the lie is very strong.

originally posted by: fireslinger369
I remember you saying that we’re at the mercy of cycles within cycles. Does less carbon fit into the end of the Kali Yuga cycle, or is there something else at play?

I'd suggest appreciating that while your bias is anthropomorphic that our environment's is not, and while anthropomorpic projections upon our environment were beneficial to our survival for tens of thousand of years they are now in danger of driving us over the cliff.

a reply to: fireslinger369

That's the thesis of the CO2 Coalition, a think-tank whose CEO was CEO of the American Petroleum Institute.
It is funded by foundations that support conservative causes, and also from energy industry officials. Their agenda is this: to intentionally mislead people into believing there's a deficit of CO2 and, hence, that you should continue expelling tons of CO2 to the atmosphere. Their business is to make money by burning fossil fuels, so it is against their interest to accept that anthropogenic CO2 emissions are a problem.

Earth's oceans, land and plants absorb 190.2 billion tonnes of CO₂ per year from the atmosphere. Natural processes such as forest fires and volcanic eruptions add roughly 190.2 billion tonnes of CO₂ to the atmosphere per year. The net result is some 0.04% of CO2 in the atmosphere. Humans generate CO₂ when burning fossil fuels such as gas, petrol, oil, and coal, which adds an additional 9.1 billion tonnes of CO₂ to the atmosphere each year. Now the imbalance is clear. Humans also seems to love burning forests, so the CO2 cannot be absorbed, which increases the CO2 concentration in the atmosphere even more.

Nature can correct that situation, but when Nature corrects something, you ain't gonna like it. It usually ends with humans becoming extinct, The CO2 Coalition included.

But you can propose this thought experiment to your family friend: let's assume the oil industry and any other industry is absolutely clean. Let's assume industry has reached a CO2 zero-emission level. You still burn forests, destroy valleys, contaminate oceans. Volcanos would still be erupting. And you are billions, breathing, and expelling CO2. And billions is your cattle, too. How could possibly be any CO2 deficit in that situation?

The most significant role of CO2 is its function in the process of photosynthesis. Green plants absorb CO2 from the air to convert, among other compounds, into oxygen. This essential process maintains the balance of oxygen and carbon dioxide in your atmosphere and supports life on Earth. But if you keep burning forests, destroying valleys, contaminating oceans, no matter if your entire planet is fuled by nuclear power plants, you'll die. Your atmosphere will have a surplus of CO2 because you have no forests, no valleys, no oceans to absorbe the excess CO2.

Transitioning to a clean industry is not enough to survive. You need to change your relation with the ecosystems. There is no other possibility.