The Language of Vampyr

originally posted by: Direne
a reply to: joshint

Our site is up and running, joshint. As for Kerysse and the YouTube channel, we silence them from time to time. The reason is there are a lot of third parties sites using our content and getting money out of it, so we close our channels from time to time for them to get the message.

Well, that explain it.

a reply to: abeverage

I have not read in the T&Cs of this site any requirement in the sense that members cannot return after 2 years, therefore I do not think that is strange. About the purpose I guess it is like asking anyone here why are they here. Everyone would have different reasons, I guess, but I cannot see any nefarious motivations behind the simple fact that people do join forums everywhere everyday.

I am drawn to this thread in particular because this thread is about our site, so it seems logical to me to be here.

As far as us meeting yes, I mean here a few orbits back on ATS.

originally posted by: Direne
a reply to: abeverage

I have not read in the T&Cs of this site any requirement in the sense that members cannot return after 2 years, therefore I do not think that is strange. About the purpose I guess it is like asking anyone here why are they here. Everyone would have different reasons, I guess, but I cannot see any nefarious motivations behind the simple fact that people do join forums everywhere everyday.

I am drawn to this thread in particular because this thread is about our site, so it seems logical to me to be here.

As far as us meeting yes, I mean here a few orbits back on ATS.

Direne,

You are welcome back at any time, I just meant why the delay?

And thank you for clarifying.

Yeah, we keep asking questions. They give us parables.

Like they say, they have lots of questions themselves.

We're all homing pigeons after all, yeah right...

To answer Mr.mod's question. They could simply say, freedom.

Just saying.

ok spent 3 days reading every single post. great thread and what i lurked this site for years.

few questions and such

1. why did it take so damn long in the beginning for people to realize that nodespaces and nodespace are NOT the same thing? i was so annoyed by this i wanted to somehow invent a time machine. just so I could remove the blinders people had on to reality, just so they could find a conspiracy.

2. I figured like 3 pages in the vampire language was a literal sense of a language that steals sounds spellings and meanings from other previous languages. not twilight in real life. why was this so hard for everyone else?

ok for Direne
1. how can someone get access to nodespaces? what OS environment is this ran on?

2. is the posting on FL done by writing in your native tongue and then running it through a nodespaces translator/encoder, or are you all writing in first hand?

3. while nodespaces is used for a linguistics purpose at the moment. have you or the softwares creator ever thought of using it to create a new machine language? per the DARPA challenge? the use of color in the casinni thing looks promising for a new machine language, since it at its basis it would not just be off/on, I/O, but lets say a constant white light beam that travels through a prism and light spectrum is the new 0 THRU 1

4. what is your specific professional specialty Direne? what is your contribution to the nodespaces software and/or FL project as a whole? or are you just a member of the forum group?

5. why not share your (fl) prediction of an august 5 event? i highly doubt that announcing here it will have any worldly affect. Unless of course the ideas of the FL sites leader of being a mossad agent have truth, and the event is israel bombing an iranian enrichment facility.

6. why did you and/or FL as a group play on the fears and desires of the ATS forums? why not just answer our questions and interests with straight forward answers like it seems were given to a Russian site?

i got bunch of more questions too but figured lets start slow no need for ya to go away for 2 years again

originally posted by: Direne
However, the question on whether is it possible to abduct a biological entity by projecting a beam that allows that entity to be transported aboard a ship crossing through a wall needs be investigated. We need to first understand what laws of physics would be involved in such a deed before ruling out that scenario. I think this is the debate.

Obviously, accepting that physics does not rule out the existence of extraterrestrials, it is obvious that their existence is time-independent, that is, they can exist now, tomorrow, or yesterday. Time is irrelevant.

Now, whether those guys are grays, ancient, or NSA employees is not relevant. The relevant thing is whether you can use a beam to bring an apple to my desk, assuming the apple is 200 meters away from me, and that between the apple and me there is a thick wall of concrete. That is the question at hand. Do you agree?

Hello DIrene, I have been happily playing around with the concept of what I am calling, as a working title, the "Temporal Snicket Maker". While, utilising the conceptual model I'm working from, it seems perfectly possible to get through from one side or another, I don't feel it is going to be good for the apple though, let alone me if I have to carry it through as we'd be subject to the same forces as the wall, as well as contributing to the interactions.

a reply to: Anaana

It looks like you refer to the "Temporal Sniper Target" concept, by which a bullet can happily go through an apple, regardless of the apple's opinion about it. However Anaana, bear in mind that every action has a reaction. Now seriously, I would like to know how do you imagine the other side, once you've went through the wall.

a reply to: snowman22

I will answer all of your six questions if you just answer this one: what are your desires and fears?

originally posted by: joshint
So far I have gained a little understanding about QM, consciousness, and the connection of both.

The understanding is still incomplete, something is still amiss.

However, this may be Step 3 (still in progress) :

I have been trying to find an image that sums up how step three, as you've illustrated it, would have to relate to my model of step one, this one isn't great but might give you an idea.



I believe that your Tractoring Beam would have to be a seperate "entity", and that that beam would need to be immune to the forces creating the "Temporal Snicket" and generating a seperate environment within the Beam. Anyone know how possible that is? I am thinking it could be similar to the eye of Tornado, so may be possible.

originally posted by: Direne
a reply to: Anaana

It looks like you refer to the "Temporal Sniper Target" concept, by which a bullet can happily go through an apple, regardless of the apple's opinion about it. However Anaana, bear in mind that every action has a reaction. Now seriously, I would like to know how do you imagine the other side, once you've went through the wall.

No, no sniper involved, merely exploiting discrete energy states to facilitate excitation and oscillation.

originally posted by: Direne
Now seriously, I would like to know how do you imagine the other side, once you've went through the wall.

I'm still thinking about what I am actually doing to the wall at this stage. We were quantum tunnelling remember, so on that premise, much would depend on what was on the other side of the wall to interact with.

a reply to: Anaana

You can use neutrinos. They hardly interact with anything, and they can cross from one end of the Earth to the other without interacting at all. Of course, this has a problem: your neutrino beam will not interact with the target either.

You can get the entire wall into a coherence state, though, making it oscillate in a specific way. You can then use a beam which oscillates at a different frequency such that atoms in the wall won't interact with atoms of the beam. This would turn the wall "invisible" to your beam. Or you can use a StarTrek teleportation thing, like this one:

Teleportation Scheme

Interesting mechanics.

Maybe you can use a portal to get through the wall.

originally posted by: Direne
a reply to: Anaana

You can use neutrinos. They hardly interact with anything, and they can cross from one end of the Earth to the other without interacting at all. Of course, this has a problem: your neutrino beam will not interact with the target either.

You can get the entire wall into a coherence state, though, making it oscillate in a specific way. You can then use a beam which oscillates at a different frequency such that atoms in the wall won't interact with atoms of the beam. This would turn the wall "invisible" to your beam. Or you can use a StarTrek teleportation thing, like this one:

Teleportation Scheme

I'd love to read that paper but sadly not only are parts of it in a dialect that I am unfamiliar with, some of it seems to be in a language that I altogether don't understand.



I don't know enough about neutrinos to comment about that, but, could a neutrino beam contain a Tractor Beam within it? And, naturally, given the wider questioning, one big enough to hold an entire human personage?
And also, while one neutrino may be electromagnetically invisible, what happens when you combine sufficient neutrinos together to produce such a beam?

I have no idea.

a reply to: joshint

In which case, a stihl saw would be far more reliable than my model which requires a combination of factors.

I am assuming here, someone correct me if I am wrong, that a factor in such abduction scenarios would be a lack of evidence that anything happened? Yes? So, my "Temporal Snicket Maker" (TM 2015 ) would have to leave no obvious evidence that it had done it's business. That was the presumption that I was working under anyway.

originally posted by: Direne
a reply to: snowman22

I will answer all of your six questions if you just answer this one: what are your desires and fears?

well even though i would rather not have a "tailored" answer. i desire peanut butter frozen custard every other day of the week and fear the death of beloved family pets, but not cats, at the hands of their owners.

a reply to: snowman22

...i desire peanut butter frozen custard every other day of the week

There is so much weird, rampant psychism happening on this thread. I swear.

Just wanted to let you know that I ate, like, 5 or 6 ozs of that stuff last night and, miraculously, Godzilla was born in my lower GI tract.

All I'm saying is: be careful what you desire for. I mean, you could get Mothra, or even Gidhra, but I would be careful.

funny thing is i really am not joking i really do not desire much in my life than what i already have, and that was the first thing that came to mind.

a reply to: snowman22

Not cats? Pets having "owners"? I am sorry I cannot give you any valid answer then. I'll turn you into a cat for you to show some empathy to them.

Anyway, the narrative on abductions by grays using beams and all that has proven false, which casts serious doubt on alien abductions in general. No need to abduct anyone to get some knowledge about human physiology when you can just go to the local library and read everything humans have written about their own physiology. Something cats have not done yet.

Anaana is right: we lack evidence; this plus the physical impossibility of crossing through walls, makes the whole story a subject of folklore. Or psychiatry.

So fear not those imaginary grays yet fear cats: don't expect any mercy from them, for you hate them.

a reply to: Direne

o so i guess my question will not be answer in a straight forward manner.. all good.

a reply to: snowman22

Or maybe in nearly 2 years? hehe!