Bigfoot yay or nay ?

reply to post by rimjaja


Well I put you in the Yay column, if that's wrong I'm sure you will say so.

Yay - 31

Nay - 21

With respect to everyone this is simply a survey of my own doing. And we all agree that
the more popular vote says nothing of righteousness. This is all just for the sake of entertainment.

And I mean that. I think, no I do I do.

reply to post by randyvs


Randy in the interest of being fair you should have one other column for those of us who say it’s possible.

I would be in that column.

reply to post by randyvs


just impossible.

Bigfoot does not exist.
There is not possibility a huge being can live in this age without being filmed at least once....

Originally posted by Grimpachi
reply to post by randyvs

 

Randy in the interest of being fair you should have one other column for those of us who say it’s possible.

I would be in that column.

I would easily go along with your request Grim if not for the heading.

Seems strange that this animal can survive for this long. There cannot be only 1, there must be more of them, or else it's not logical.

If these animals exist, then by this time you would have to find a dead body or skeletons or whatever to prove it, just seems so un-logical. And every footage sucks, so it's not really a question, people telling weird stories about things they have seen in the distance or in the dark when obviously their mind have been playing tricks on them.

Sorry, but NAY.

Does not exist, not at this time.

Add me to a yay, I think the world still has many places where man has not set foot, so If a Big dude wants to hide I think it is possible to do so.

Originally posted by MichaelPMaccabee
No, I am saying that there is only one species of hominids that can 'survive' in all climates type is the world.

and what evidence are you basing that on? how do you know that you know all there is to know about hominoids? that's like saying "I have goldfish therefore I know all there is to know about every species of fish known and unknown.".

just because humans have no natural niche in this biosphere doesn't mean they (bf) don't. They could be the missing link between us and apes per se and have adapted naturally unlike us.

it's like you are saying "they can't exist because I know what its like to be a human nor can I imagine them surviving without technology.". it's kinda silly.

Originally posted by Grimpachi
reply to post by bottleslingguy

 

Well it is possible that they eat the marrow from them after pulverizing them with rocks although if such a creature exists the jaw muscles could be extremely strong as well. Without a specimen we can imagine many possibilities.

true. something taught in order to maintain stealth. although very tempting I cringe at the idea of "a specimen".

Originally posted by MichaelPMaccabee

Is there any truth to the Paul Bunyon legends?

that one doesn't cross cultural lines, has no forensic, video or eye witness evidence, nor has it ever been claimed to be anything other than a tall tale.

your argument is specious at best

reply to post by WeRpeons

I can't stand it when, instead of digitally analyzing the sound they play music or sound effects. Although I like Bobo it is quite an annoying show to say the least.

Originally posted by SLO7H
just seems so un-logical.

that has GOT to be the argument of the century

Originally posted by boymonkey74
Add me to a yay, I think the world still has many places where man has not set foot, so If a Big dude wants to hide I think it is possible to do so.

Can't think of a good reason why, but so far you and Saturn FX are the two biggest surprizes to me.

I believe with all of my soul! I find it hard to think that we have discovered everything. Look how much land is in Canada that isn't inhabited. They could easily hide from us and as far as someone mentioning a winter den that's assuming that they have one. I don't see these things needing a den. I think of them as wondering super intelligent beings. Who says they need a place to live. What if they wonder and when they find where they want to stop for the night they will. Its like trying to find a hobo wondering in the middle of the woods that never stops moving. If there is very few of them its less likely we find them.

reply to post by randyvs

Bigfoot yay or nay ?

Nay,

because he has migrated for concerning reasons of privacy.

He is sick to be spied by all the letters of the alphabet.

The one I saw was more ape like. I don't know if there is more than one species or just regional physical differences due to climate. The Myakka skunk ape photos, I believe are one of the best pictures of the skunk ape even though the naysayers call it a hoax. It looks almost exactly as the one I saw.

www.lorencoleman.com...


Also note this one is in a palmetto bush also.

Originally posted by bottleslingguy

Originally posted by MichaelPMaccabee

Is there any truth to the Paul Bunyon legends?

that one doesn't cross cultural lines, has no forensic, video or eye witness evidence, nor has it ever been claimed to be anything other than a tall tale.

your argument is specious at best

That's simply not true.

Paul Bunyon forensic evidence is vast. Created the Grand Canyon. He painted the Pictured Rocks, there are eye witnesses to his legend scattered throughout time. I've -seen- Paul Bunyon's axe. He is touted from California to Maine.

Now tell me again, how is this different than Bigfoot?

Originally posted by bottleslingguy

Originally posted by MichaelPMaccabee
No, I am saying that there is only one species of hominids that can 'survive' in all climates type is the world.

and what evidence are you basing that on? how do you know that you know all there is to know about hominoids? that's like saying "I have goldfish therefore I know all there is to know about every species of fish known and unknown.".

just because humans have no natural niche in this biosphere doesn't mean they (bf) don't. They could be the missing link between us and apes per se and have adapted naturally unlike us.

it's like you are saying "they can't exist because I know what its like to be a human nor can I imagine them surviving without technology.". it's kinda silly.

Don't cherry pick lines and then claim they are unsupported. I supported my claims within the posts I made, perhaps you need to go back and reread my posts.

Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by MichaelPMaccabee

 

The Paterson film that was digitally analyzed wasn't an original, only a copy (I assumed you are referring to the digitzation done for the History Channel, because I know of no other digital analysis), and as such, isn't all that conclusive or reliable. If the original film was analyzed, it would be a better piece of evidence.

Of course I'm speaking of the digitization analyzation. And seeing nothing was faked about or around any of it, as documented, you can guess I stick by statement.

It has nothing to do with faking. I have no doubt that they had only the best intentions. However, the science was bad.

You can't make a copy of the film and then digitize the copy and analyze it and expect to get any kind of accurate results. It would be like someone trying to determine the nature of the paper used in 5000 year old torah based on a digital scan of a xerox copy.

reply to post by dudeman351


One correction on my encounter post on page 5. I meant to write 20 yards but was thinking 60 feet so it came out 60 yards. It was about 20 yards. Sorry for the confusion. So yes it was close enough to not be mistaken of what it was.

Originally posted by MichaelPMaccabee

Now, for your theory to be correct..

1. Bigfoot must exist.
2. Secret Societies must control all of the banks.
3. Banks and Big Business must control every single government, because if they didn't control every government, the science could simply be published in the countries not controlled by these entities.
4. All Big Business and Banks must always agree to keep information on Bigfoot secret.
5. Aliens are visiting our planet.
6. Big Business and Banks are keeping Aliens secret.
7. The Known Archaeological Record is false.
8. Big Business and Banks are keeping True Archaeological records secret.

While, my theory is must more simple.

1. Bigfoot doesn't exist.

Occum's razor sides with me, friend.

Its a pyramid structure of control much like a financial ponzi scheme. For people who have not done the appropriate research it sounds mindboggling and I don't expect you to believe me, so if you don't believe me then why continue to argue?

Simplicity is for simple people who do not comprehend conspiracy theory. I personally love simplicity, but the rulers do not. You can't pretend to have a democracy, while at the same time surreptitiously carrying out treachery, without "complicated" well thought out plans.