It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by luciddream
reply to post by akushla99
Yes, it is "insane" to talk to imaginary people. Kids get a pass because of their growing mind and in need of a companion. Their action won't cause worldly harm Unlike the adult version.
Yes kid are "insane" but adults imaginary friends are deadly.
Originally posted by vethumanbeing
Originally posted by akushla99
Originally posted by vethumanbeing
Originally posted by akushla99
Very young children 'talk to imaginery people'...
Are very young children 'insane'? Å99
Open they are VHB...I was lucky enough to be born under an inquisitive, but cautious star...I could no sooner prove that I see the color red, than that I could hear voices...so, for others they don't exist (and I am insane) and I don't really see the color red...that would be insanity also...Å99
Have you regained the ability now? I am extemely disapointed in the Psychiatric community pushing forth the idea that hearing voices is crazy. Jesus, Moses, John the Babtist (just some of more familar Christian icons) heard voices and in this society would be deemed 'mentally ill'; locked up, medicated. Some of us are sensitives, I am in that I can access the ether world, and 'talk to" beings not physical in the 3D. I am a clear channel. There is nothing wrong with me, its just an ability I have and I document the conversations (write them, as they are occuring). Higher self probably. Its as natural to me as knowing red is the frequency of light RED, the heartbeat is the sound frequency 40HZ.
vethumanbeing
Have you regained the ability now? I am extemely disapointed in the Psychiatric community pushing forth the idea that hearing voices is crazy. Jesus, Moses, John the Babtist (just some of more familar Christian icons) heard voices and in this society would be deemed 'mentally ill'; locked up, medicated. Some of us are sensitives, I am in that I can access the ether world, and 'talk to" beings not physical in the 3D. I am a clear channel. There is nothing wrong with me, its just an ability I have and I document the conversations (write them, as they are occuring). Higher self probably. Its as natural to me as knowing red is the frequency of light RED, the heartbeat is the sound frequency 40HZ.
A99
Either way VHB, the ability to 'pick up' a signal is dependant on the equipment that does the picking up...you, of all people, know this ...and 'pieces of equipment' that cannot 'pick up' what is not in thier range of perceptive parameters of input (mechano-organic or purely mechanical) can justifyably claim that this is because it does not exist...sobeit...It is, of course, always a moot question posited, from a position of bio-mechanical blindness...that much is evident......otherwise I am an insane adult on the streets of (or mountainside) of the city, cutting around with dangerous and deadly imaginery friends...I should medicate and withdraw, as a public service, so as to (k)not foister imaginery, but deadly, friends, on the general public...
Originally posted by akushla99
Originally posted by luciddream
reply to post by akushla99
Yes, it is "insane" to talk to imaginary people. Kids get a pass because of their growing mind and in need of a companion. Their action won't cause worldly harm Unlike the adult version.
Yes kid are "insane" but adults imaginary friends are deadly.
I'll accept your 'prognosis' as mainstream and amateur...
...what if adults are in need of a companion?...your prognosis would have them all...medicated or institutionalised...non? If they are 'imaginery' how can they be 'deadly'?
There is difference between 'Son of Sam' madness and praying to a god...(subject of the OP) Å99
Originally posted by gladtobehere
First off, we need to stop using the terms "crazy", "insane", "mentally unstable" etc.
Should be clear by now that there is an effort to label the masses as "crazy". Whats the motivation? Big Pharma trying to sell more psychotropic drugs. Government using it as a means to silence opposition (Truthers for example) and to strip people of their rights (Second Amendment).
But for the purposes of this thread, lets say that a person who hears voices is "insane". That if that same person were to communicate with an imaginary being, he or she would be considered crazy.
Now lets discuss in the context of religion.
Help me to understand how this is different when someone talks to "God". Even if someone believes in "God", obviously, theres no one there. Many claim that "God" even replies...
I'm asking a general question but I would like to use the following example.
Bush: God told me to invade Iraq.
In any other context, if someone were to hear voices telling them to commit acts of violence (let alone attacking an entire nation), they would be jailed and or committed...
edit on 25-6-2013 by gladtobehere because: (no reason given)