The Names We Do Not Speak: The FEMALE Illuminati!

reply to post by NoRegretsEver


OP referred to feminism as "feminism". There is a distinction

From reading the OP it seems like a Satanist woman is just my type.

I am not a satanist, I am a nihilist.

Men are disposable. Drones,workers,soldiers,sperm donors. Women rule the roost. They raise the children, teaching them what to think. They maintain the home base. In a lot of ancient cultures, tribes were ruled by women. In modern times they allow men to have the illusion of rule! Who do you think runs things? Bill or Hil?

Originally posted by RothchildRancor
From reading the OP it seems like a Satanist woman is just my type.

I am not a satanist, I am a nihilist.

Well the quote was taken from this site ( www.churchofsatan.com... )

So maybe you would be interested in this one;


Marylin Monroe (actress) was a stripper before she hit it big and supposedly had ties to LaVey

Jane Mansfield (actress) was a pledged member of LaVey's church of satan.
( en.wikipedia.org... )

Tina Louis ( actress) was very into "occultism" and the church of satan.
( en.wikipedia.org... )

These are a few VERY influential women as far as culture is concerned.

EDIT
Personally I am not a fan of knowing that scoring with them would mean filthy sloppy seconds dipped in herpes

Enjoy them and try to ignore the itch

I always suspected Satanists are just the ultra liberated rich people with to much times on their hands.

Originally posted by NoRegretsEver
Please understand that you are not going to find woman bathed in blood, or torturing kittens here, that is the point.

That is a shame, there are plenty of those to be found...and they make for very interesting reading, but I suppose since Michael Tsarion is the primary source, fantasy, rather than reality is the order of the thread.

Tsarion firmly aside, women have, of course exercised power, and often indirectly due to the constraints of society. The old saying though, that behind every great man stood a great woman, is not necessarily true, many of those men were weak and ineffectual leaders who were fortunate enough to have had marriages arranged for them to women of great intellect and fortitude. Eleanor of Acquitaine springs to mind...

en.wikipedia.org...

Often though the motives of women married to powerful men are not driven by a desire to obtain power for themselves, but for that of their progeny...such as Olympias murdering Philip of Macedonia to ensure that Alexander could rule, or Barbara Palmer, mistress of Charles the II, who ensured all her five children were recognised by the King and suitably titled. During the times in place and history where women were excluded from rights of property ownership and the accumulation of wealth, women in order to succeed or often survive, were required to act deceptively to achieve those ends. It is a bit of a chicken and egg situation, was it that inherited power led to the rise of weak and ineffectual leadership? Or was it the machinations of Mother's who thought that by pushing forward their sons they could hold onto the status and power that only marriage or motherhood to leadership could afford them? Fortunately we are living in a time when women are able to earn their own living and prove themselves in their own right, and do not have to use sex to get them where they want to go.

However, the OP does raise some interesting insights, and today, just as in the past, the knowledge that the male of the species is easily manipulated and controlled by means of sex, has traversed all social and cultural boundaries. Madame de Montespan, to bring us back to bathing in blood, used all sorts of ancient blood magic to capture the quarry of her choice, Louis 14th of France, these days, men are merely distracted by the seemingly ready availability of sex on a plate or made resentful that they seem excluded from the free-for-all(-but-them). Perhaps it is due to a female illuminati, or maybe it is just another means to keep people in those cages that you very astutely observed in your second 'Human Zoo' thread. The only really difference between now and then, is that women have greater power to choose whether to be objects of desire. Or not. As the case may be.

Originally posted by polarwarrior

" The smartest, most passionate, most beautiful women I've met have been Satanists. I don't mean "beautiful on the insidewhere it really counts;" I mean gorgeous, vibrant, curvy women. Most non-Satanic men find Satanic women intimidating - too intelligent or too pretty, or worse yet, both at the same time. It takes a special woman to be a Satanist. Only the most truly liberated are summoned to Satan's legions. Up until quite recently, the ratio of Satanic men to women had been about 10 to 1, but that seems to be shifting. More and more young women are going through the process of exploring feminism and Wicca, seeking feminine pride, identity and power, and discovering only impotence, limitations and puritanical self-righteousness.

So liberated women are satanists? Especially if they are intelligent? And now with feminism there are way more satanist women?

I see where there is going.... God wants women to bake cookies, do the housework and service their husbands.

Typical christian excrement

You dont bake cookies and serve men graciously?

Im praying for your soul XD



Im not sure i can take an illuminate thread seriously when they link videos of Lady gaga being in a group of the worlds most powerful people.

Its people who create these kinds of threads that give the conspiracy theorists the "crazy" label.

Originally posted by lucifer6
reply to post by NoRegretsEver

 

Are you revealing the names of our goddesses...

Breaking oaths much

Lucifer is a goddess? A tranny goddess? How do I join in this cult? I am a woman. Is that all it takes? Let me tell you I think we are all going to stay the same and what ever happens, if it happens, will do so only after the queen passes away. Right now we are in a waiting game. I think she is last in line of the old guard and the new guard will rule in her stead. I think that's going to be a good thing.

reply to post by SearchLightsInc


I disagree. I think it is interesting and thoughtful. The most peaceful and advanced cultures are those where the women share power with the men. Men left on their own spiral out of control into a sort of primitive blood lust and madness. The only project they seem to work on with any degree of passion is finding a more efficient and creative way to kill. I think women deliberately distract from that agenda and point them in new directions, encompassing other agendas, other wise we'd have just kept building bigger, more powerful bombs, killed ourselves off and wiped humanity off the earth earlier.

Originally posted by onequestion
reply to post by winofiend

 

If only.

But as a fellow fan and conspiracy nut, i would imagine you watch that show with connect it with many things just like i do. It does go deep into this subject matter within the plot.

I already assume the subject matter is fertile ground for a lot of stories, it's like having mummies in Egyptian horror movies. It's just the association.

I don't think there is any 'tells' in it. They're just using it because it instils an air of mystery and ties common conspiracy with the story.

I think the same about all the 'illuminati' stars. they're just acting, pretending they're far more important than they are. I don't think for a moment that they are really involved with super secret powerful people who control the world from behind an invisible curtain. Madonna started it all the pillock.. lol

reply to post by KilgoreTrout


Why not start a thread on gruesome and bloodthirsty women, like Lizzy Borden? I would like to read about women who have no reason to kill. A woman who kills someone for abuse or assault, no matter how revolting does not make a heinous senseless killer out of her. Thinking of Eileen Wornos who killed the men who tried to get sex from her even though she led them to believe that is what they were going to get. The profilers in that case figured early on they were looking for a woman because she did not shoot her victims with a "killshot" in the head or the heart, she shot them in the stomach. Profilers theorized on some level (because she was a woman) she was unable to pull off a direct kill and so aimed for a non lethal part of the body and let them bleed out. I would enjoy reading about the truly deranged and born that way mainly because I don't think you will actually find that many, but then I have a curiosity regarding the macabre.

Just look at Margaret Thatcher!

There is thousands who believe she was pure evil.

Myself included.

May she rot in hell.

reply to post by NoRegretsEver


The FEMALE Illuminati..............one word

HILLARY CLINTON

reply to post by NoRegretsEver


NoRegretsEver, 1 found the thread to be very interesting in concerns with female secret societies.. 1 has always felt there is / was connections existing between Female and Male secret societies. Also the information about Lilith/Innana/Isis/Ishtar seems related to those who come from the sky ANNUNAKI perhaps that was the original plan... Lilith & Adam EA*RTH offspring, but the relations between these two may of been too different which required the genetic response with EVE from Adam.. Who then encountered another ANNUNAKI presence in the Garden... Connections...


LOVE LIGHT ETERNIA*******

reply to post by winofiend


I agree. I do however believe that the Rothchild family is a super secret powerful mafia family that controls major interests across the globe. They are what i consider the closest thing to the Illuminati.

If only people really understand. They chase after rabbits all the time, they look at the many trails and the thousands of codes.

If you only knew what the dark hat mismanagers of the world has hidden, its very simple answers, for advancement and progression of souls, and then hijacked and divided into tiny little pieces here and there, and then on top of that, they put big scarey monsters, snakes and dragons, gargoyles and demons as gate keepers so the average folk who accidentally discovers Genesis 32 30 mentions pineal, and starts to notice things, will look at the gate keeper and run in fear.

They're not nice guys.

We're here to work on our flaws and improve ourselves or grow our consciousness souls and some come in over and over again and reincarnate, others at different times, and not just earth. This is just one school, and we're not glued to it.

So the basic reality as above, so below, Men and Women, Father and Mother, the ideal male energy, the ideal female energies, unity, peace, love, wedding, union. What is the ideal male energy? Its NOT WAR AND DOMINATION! What is the ideal female energy? Its NOT MATERIALISM OR SHOPPING!

A terrific Dad is Kind and Understanding, a Great Leader/Teacher. Serve and Protect. Freedom!!!! Creator/Creative/Inventor! Hugs his kids alot and gives them many choices, free will! And respects their choices.

A terrific Mom empowers her children, works on their self esteem. Goes the extra mile to reach those who have fallen into bad things, who have become bad guys. EQUALITY. Work of equal value. All live equally. No Slavery. Opposite Dog Eat Dog Commercialism or Forced Employment. Forgiveness, Compassion, Intuitive, Wise.

The two are wedded fundamentally, in the world we would have heaven on earth.

But, this means, right and left hemisphere, pineal and pituatary waking up the Son of God/Thalamus/Third Eye. The outer consciousness, dumbed down and seeing the material world, in allignment with positive thoughts one with the Subconscious so that co-creation, positivity and abundance flow around us. We can bring heaven to earth.

And in this , the hidden female illuminati symbolism, what do ya think they're coding?

The simple way back home, Mother's energy. They're saying Give Give Give, to receive. Be Kind, Forgive, and Equality.

And do they ever suppress females on teh surface. Burqa's and veils. Second class citizenship. Don't listen to women, they talk emotional gobbly gook. We need to do satanic ritual sacrifices and portal demons and listen to them to make us wise.

They may even believe their coding by now!

But its so simply.

All that is hidden: Meditate, the waters of baptism, Give to others, STO, balance the Freedom and Equality, and the ideal energies of Mom and Dad, and you connect to Source which is Love and Higher Self, and awaken, and become superman in the system and help bring heaven to earth, plus progress.

That is the whole sum of the mysteries and all that they have buried in thousands of codes.

And the prominance of the Female or Goddess is because the coding for the universe/matrix is WOMB. Sophia ,the intercessor between worlds, IS the tree of life, with roots that reach to lower realms and branches that reach to heaven. Christ is also like Sophia, the intercessor. He's Mother's energy too!

What is being said is after the children fight for their freedom, then the way back home is to find their HEART and EQUALITY.

Originally posted by Unity_99


What is being said is after the children fight for their freedom, then the way back home is to find their HEART and EQUALITY.

Father's energies are needed, though not the bent out of shape war mongling abusive/smiting kind, thats a big TRAP. For Balance we need Freedom, Creativity, Good leadership (the kind that empowers everyone), and Inventions. BUT, the prominance of the Female, the Goddess is because MOTHER's ENERGY OF LOVE IS THE WAY BACK HOME. The TREE OF LIFE!

None of this is sexist. They're codes. To examine them with a pure good heart, all you do is ask, what is an ideal female energy, and what is a wonderful male energy.

So we're not talking about Goddess being the way home, or God being the way home. We're saying LOVE is the way home. Its the attribute not the symbol that counts.

Originally posted by NoRegretsEver
reply to post by FriedBabelBroccoli

 

Sorry OP you made the mistake of mentioning anything that could possibly be taken as derogatory towards women.

Be prepared for the onslaught of hate that will come your way starting . . . now, oh too late!

Even though I dont think its relevant on whether this is about woman or not, those that understand what I am saying will. Knowledge is knowledge, and I am sharing that knowledge with others whether they agree or not is up to them.

So let them bring what they will, Im not new here

BTW, this isnt about men or woman, this is about power and who holds it. Those that think this is sexist, are actually turning it sexist by assuming that saying that woman hold this type of power cant/shouldnt/couldnt or that its derogatory.


Peace, NRE.

edit on 18-6-2013 by NoRegretsEver because: IM A WOMAN AND I SEE NOTHIGN WRONG WITH THIS THREAD, OR WHAT IT IMPLIES.

I would like to think that the stars that you have for this post alone are mainly from intelligent women who can understand your point and not take it as being in any way sexist ... I can confirm at least one star is from an intelligent woman

Good thread. Woody