It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I just thought it was INTERESTING that the NWO would reveal their plans to you. You can't say they didn't inform you, or you didn't know.
Really? Oh, ok. I'll take YOUR word for it.
Originally posted by flyswatter
Originally posted by WonderBoi
reply to post by flyswatter
Is not the same statement as HAARP being used to "help" control the weather. Is it? They were thinking weather control was possible a long time ago; just like they thought flying was "possible" and look at that reality.
HAARP controlling the weather
I dont think anyone here has said that weather control is impossible. I'm certain that there are things that they could do to influence the weather. My only point of contention is that HAARP is not a piece of the technology that accomplishes this, and nothing provided in or linked to in this thread shows that it does. You have claimed that you have proof of it, but you have not provided it.
So does it actually exist, and do you actually have it, or are you just stating that you think it can? There's a big difference.
And NO, i'm not providing links, to make your life easier. I've provided enough information to help you figure this stuff out. Go get a coloring book, and learn how to connect the dots.
A portion of the energy contained in the high frequency radio wave transmitted by HAARP can be transferred to existing electrons or ions making up the ionospheric plasma through a process called absorption, thus raising the local effective temperature. As an example, the typical electron temperature at a height of 275 km (the peak of the F2 region) may be on the order of 1400°K. Work at other active ionospheric research facilities has shown that it is possible to raise this temperature by as much as 30% within a small, localized region during an experiment. The affected region would then temporarily display electrical characteristics different from neighboring regions of the layer. Sensitive scientific instruments on the ground can then be used to study the dynamic physical properties of this region in great detail.
As the electrons (and ions) acquire additional energy, their temperature increases, their kinetic energy increases and they begin to move more rapidly. In the F layer, this increased movement or expansion results in a decrease in the electron density (electrons move into adjacent undisturbed regions). Experience at other active ionospheric research facilities has shown that electron densities in the small, affected region may be reduced by 10% to 20%.
You still watch their PROGRAMMING. You still buy their fast foods. You still fill up at the pump. You still pay taxes, which funds the military industrial complex. You still support the very thing you protest against. Not sure how you're gonna win the battle, when you're supplying the enemy.
Originally posted by WonderBoi
Really? Oh, ok. I'll take YOUR word for it.
Originally posted by flyswatter
Originally posted by WonderBoi
reply to post by flyswatter
Is not the same statement as HAARP being used to "help" control the weather. Is it? They were thinking weather control was possible a long time ago; just like they thought flying was "possible" and look at that reality.
HAARP controlling the weather
I dont think anyone here has said that weather control is impossible. I'm certain that there are things that they could do to influence the weather. My only point of contention is that HAARP is not a piece of the technology that accomplishes this, and nothing provided in or linked to in this thread shows that it does. You have claimed that you have proof of it, but you have not provided it.
So does it actually exist, and do you actually have it, or are you just stating that you think it can? There's a big difference.And NO, i'm not providing links, to make your life easier. I've provided enough information to help you figure this stuff out. Go get a coloring book, and learn how to connect the dots.
A portion of the energy contained in the high frequency radio wave transmitted by HAARP can be transferred to existing electrons or ions making up the ionospheric plasma through a process called absorption, thus raising the local effective temperature. As an example, the typical electron temperature at a height of 275 km (the peak of the F2 region) may be on the order of 1400°K. Work at other active ionospheric research facilities has shown that it is possible to raise this temperature by as much as 30% within a small, localized region during an experiment. The affected region would then temporarily display electrical characteristics different from neighboring regions of the layer. Sensitive scientific instruments on the ground can then be used to study the dynamic physical properties of this region in great detail.
As the electrons (and ions) acquire additional energy, their temperature increases, their kinetic energy increases and they begin to move more rapidly. In the F layer, this increased movement or expansion results in a decrease in the electron density (electrons move into adjacent undisturbed regions). Experience at other active ionospheric research facilities has shown that electron densities in the small, affected region may be reduced by 10% to 20%.
And NO, i'm not providing links, to make your life easier.
15c.) Intellectual Property: You will not Post any copyrighted material owned by others, material belonging to another person, material previously Posted by you on another website, or link to any copyrighted material without providing proper attribution*, as defined by TAN, to its original source.
For the lazy
Originally posted by tsurfer2000h
reply to post by WonderBoi
And NO, i'm not providing links, to make your life easier.
Actually you should and are required to...
15c.) Intellectual Property: You will not Post any copyrighted material owned by others, material belonging to another person, material previously Posted by you on another website, or link to any copyrighted material without providing proper attribution*, as defined by TAN, to its original source.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
How about those links?
Originally posted by WonderBoi
reply to post by InhaleExhale
Please explain how i have "blinders" on? You seem like you're the one still stuck in the box. Who's the one that can't see? You're probably the 1st one to moan and groan, when the government needs more money, talking about: "Revolution!!!" SIT DOWN!
Nevertheless, I'm still waiting for ANY one of you to prove YOUR non-sense.
Originally posted by flyswatter
Originally posted by WonderBoi
For the person that said: "believe in a better world", let me show you, what TPTB "believe" in your land of make-believe.Not sure why ANY of you would side with these mad scientists, regarding weather modification. You're the same people that scream how evil the banking system is, when they need another one of their bailouts. WHICH SIDE ARE YOU ON???????
In August of 1953 the United States formed the President’s Advisory Committee on Weather Control. Its stated purpose was Joplin Tornado Joplin Tornado to determine the effectiveness of weather modification procedures and the extent to which the government should engage in such activities. Methods that were envisioned by both American and Soviet scientists – and openly discussed in the media during the mid-1950s – included using colored pigments on the polar ice caps to melt them and unleash devastating floods, releasing large quantities of dust into the stratosphere creating precipitation on demand, and even building a dam fitted with thousands of nuclear powered pumps across the Bering Straits.
Your questions are valid, but this does not appear to be a thread about the general goings-on inside of the government, or the good/bad things that have come from their decisions.
You're free to believe what you want, I wont knock you for that. But you've stated there is proof of your ideas about HAARP controlling the weather, and we have yet to see you produce any of that.
Last year, we looked at some fascinating data from the DEMETER spacecraft showing a significant increase in ultra-low frequency radio signals before the magnitude 7 Haiti earthquake in January 2010
Dimitar Ouzounov at the NASA Goddard Space Flight Centre in Maryland and a few buddies present the data from the Great Tohoku earthquake which devastated Japan on 11 March. Their results, although preliminary, are eye-opening.
They say that before the M9 earthquake, the total electron content of the ionosphere increased dramatically over the epicentre, reaching a maximum three days before the quake struck.
At the same time, satellite observations showed a big increase in infrared emissions from above the epicentre, which peaked in the hours before the quake. In other words, the atmosphere was heating up.
Originally posted by WonderBoi
Nevertheless, I'm still waiting for ANY one of you to prove YOUR non-sense.
Originally posted by flyswatter
Originally posted by WonderBoi
For the person that said: "believe in a better world", let me show you, what TPTB "believe" in your land of make-believe.Not sure why ANY of you would side with these mad scientists, regarding weather modification. You're the same people that scream how evil the banking system is, when they need another one of their bailouts. WHICH SIDE ARE YOU ON???????
In August of 1953 the United States formed the President’s Advisory Committee on Weather Control. Its stated purpose was Joplin Tornado Joplin Tornado to determine the effectiveness of weather modification procedures and the extent to which the government should engage in such activities. Methods that were envisioned by both American and Soviet scientists – and openly discussed in the media during the mid-1950s – included using colored pigments on the polar ice caps to melt them and unleash devastating floods, releasing large quantities of dust into the stratosphere creating precipitation on demand, and even building a dam fitted with thousands of nuclear powered pumps across the Bering Straits.
Your questions are valid, but this does not appear to be a thread about the general goings-on inside of the government, or the good/bad things that have come from their decisions.
You're free to believe what you want, I wont knock you for that. But you've stated there is proof of your ideas about HAARP controlling the weather, and we have yet to see you produce any of that.
MIT Technology Review
Last year, we looked at some fascinating data from the DEMETER spacecraft showing a significant increase in ultra-low frequency radio signals before the magnitude 7 Haiti earthquake in January 2010
Dimitar Ouzounov at the NASA Goddard Space Flight Centre in Maryland and a few buddies present the data from the Great Tohoku earthquake which devastated Japan on 11 March. Their results, although preliminary, are eye-opening.
They say that before the M9 earthquake, the total electron content of the ionosphere increased dramatically over the epicentre, reaching a maximum three days before the quake struck.
At the same time, satellite observations showed a big increase in infrared emissions from above the epicentre, which peaked in the hours before the quake. In other words, the atmosphere was heating up.
Again, its up to you to prove the stated purpose wrong, not the other way around. Should everyone believe that I have unicorns in my backyard just because you cannot prove me wrong?
HAARP could not have caused the earthquake. Could something else have caused it? Well, I cant sit here and say no with absolute certainty, but they cannot steer the HAARP signal anywhere close to Haiti, so I think you're out of luck blaming HAARP on that one.
You should also note the following, from that very same link:
"The thinking is that in the days before an earthquake, the great stresses in a fault as it is about to give cause the releases large amounts of radon."
"These emissions go on to effect the ionosphere and its total electron content."
Their theory has nothing to do with HAARP, either. Bummer.edit on 10-6-2013 by flyswatter because: (no reason given)
Can you PROVE they are being used to communicate with submarines? Pretend to talk to subs? I was thinking more like lying to the public about it's actual use. But hey, if you believe the military, as a civilian, than ok. I'll buy that. Today's civilian has become today's enemy. Remember that thing called "war on terror"? How about that thing called the "Patriot Act"? Still having a hard time connecting the dots?
Originally posted by Zaphod58
reply to post by WonderBoi
Unless of course you're saying you are smarter than the military and they only use ELF to pretend to talk to subs.
Can you PROVE they are being used to communicate with submarines?
Originally posted by WonderBoi
reply to post by flyswatter
I didn't know i was in a court of law, having to prove something. It's not for me to make you believe. It's up to you to make others NOT believe.
Remember that thing called "war on terror"? How about that thing called the "Patriot Act"? Still having a hard time connecting the dots?
Connect the dots and see the BIG PICTURE. Would you like a crayon???
Originally posted by tsurfer2000h
reply to post by WonderBoi
Remember that thing called "war on terror"? How about that thing called the "Patriot Act"? Still having a hard time connecting the dots?
Your so far away from connecting the dots it is funny.
Just wondering what those have to do with HAARP?
Connect the dots and see the BIG PICTURE. Would you like a crayon???