It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
And the fact that these waves have to travel through salt water??? It doesn't matter what kind of wave it is, they still have to work with the elements and principles. Let me try to explain it to you, on a more BASIC level.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
reply to post by WonderBoi
ELF has been used to communicate with subs for years. The biggest problem with it is because the waves are so long, the messages were slow to be received by the sub. In the early days, I heard that it would take several minutes to receive a message, although that's no longer the case now from what I understand. That's why the EC-135, E-4, and E-6B all carry a trailing wire antenna, that like I said, trails out miles behind the aircraft. When they transmit over it, the entire wire, including the metal cone at the end, turns into an antenna that's transmitting.edit on 6/10/2013 by Zaphod58 because: (no reason given)
REFLECTION: When a sound wave in air reaches the surface of another material, some of the sound is reflected off the surface, while the rest of it goes into the material. For example, when sound hits a wall, some is reflected and some passes into the wall.
ABSORPTION: As sound travels though any medium, there is some loss due to absorption. Since sound is a regular vibration of the atoms or molecules in a material, some of the kinetic energy of the waveform is lost due to molecular collisions. That sound energy is turned into random heat energy.
That's what happens with sound WAVES. The same thing occurs with ELF waves, VLF waves, ULF waves, etc, etc. So, how you can believe those ELF waves are for communication purposes, doesn't make sense. Of course you're going to lose signal, when you bounce a wave 10's of thousands of feet into the atmosphere, and have those waves bounced back down, into salt water. As soon as it hits the salt water, the signal would be lost, because the waves would be absorbed by the salt, in the water.
Sound is externally reflected, absorbed, transmitted, and internally reflected when the sound wave encounters an obstacle. Reflection and absorption are dependent on the wavelength of the sound. The percentage of the sound transmitted through an obstacle depends on how much sound is reflected and how much is absorbed.
Others, like myself, tend to believe in an EVIL EMPIRE, hell bent on destroying our planet, and it's inhabitants.
Originally posted by WonderBoi
ELF waves can't travel through salt water.
Electromagnetic waves in the ELF frequency range (3–300 Hz) (see also SLF) can penetrate seawater to depths of hundreds of meters, allowing communication with submarines at their operating depths.
Believe in a more positive world? Is that all you people "believe" needs to be done? Hope for change, while you feed the beast the resources needed to build WMD's? Believe in a more positive world, when they have the power to annihilate mankind, with the flip of a button? Believe in a more positive world, when TPTB have FEMA Camps, Drones, a Police force that no longer serves the public, NSA, and plans for a NWO that doesn't include us? Believe in a more positive world, when they keep technology secret from the taxpayers who fund their "scientists gone wild" projects? Believe in a more positive world when AIDS and Syphilis were purposefully used on African Americans?
Originally posted by InhaleExhale
reply to post by WonderBoi
Others, like myself, tend to believe in an EVIL EMPIRE, hell bent on destroying our planet, and it's inhabitants.
Does the leader of this empire look anything like this Dr
Why not believe in a more positive world, instead of this evil empire you fear.
It doesn't matter if they are sound or radio, they're both HZ's. GET IT?????????? I'm using sound, as a layman's term. But apparently, you still can't absorb the frequencies i'm speaking.
Originally posted by Bedlam
reply to post by WonderBoi
You're still sort of real soft-focus on sound and radio not being in any way alike, aren't you?
Ok, click right here!
Originally posted by WonderBoi
It doesn't matter if they are sound or radio, they're both HZ's. GET IT?????????? I'm using sound, as a layman's term. But apparently, you still can't absorb the frequencies i'm speaking.
Originally posted by Bedlam
reply to post by WonderBoi
You're still sort of real soft-focus on sound and radio not being in any way alike, aren't you?
Ok, click right here!
Originally posted by WonderBoi
It doesn't matter if they are sound or radio, they're both HZ's. GET IT?????????? I'm using sound, as a layman's term. But apparently, you still can't absorb the frequencies i'm speaking.
Believe in a more positive world? Is that all you people "believe" needs to be done?
Not sure why ANY of you would side with these mad scientists, regarding weather modification. You're the same people that scream how evil the banking system is, when they need another one of their bailouts. WHICH SIDE ARE YOU ON???????
In August of 1953 the United States formed the President’s Advisory Committee on Weather Control. Its stated purpose was Joplin Tornado Joplin Tornado to determine the effectiveness of weather modification procedures and the extent to which the government should engage in such activities. Methods that were envisioned by both American and Soviet scientists – and openly discussed in the media during the mid-1950s – included using colored pigments on the polar ice caps to melt them and unleash devastating floods, releasing large quantities of dust into the stratosphere creating precipitation on demand, and even building a dam fitted with thousands of nuclear powered pumps across the Bering Straits.
For the person that said: "believe in a better world", let me show you, what TPTB "believe" in your land of make-believe.
Originally posted by WonderBoi
For the person that said: "believe in a better world", let me show you, what TPTB "believe" in your land of make-believe.Not sure why ANY of you would side with these mad scientists, regarding weather modification. You're the same people that scream how evil the banking system is, when they need another one of their bailouts. WHICH SIDE ARE YOU ON???????
In August of 1953 the United States formed the President’s Advisory Committee on Weather Control. Its stated purpose was Joplin Tornado Joplin Tornado to determine the effectiveness of weather modification procedures and the extent to which the government should engage in such activities. Methods that were envisioned by both American and Soviet scientists – and openly discussed in the media during the mid-1950s – included using colored pigments on the polar ice caps to melt them and unleash devastating floods, releasing large quantities of dust into the stratosphere creating precipitation on demand, and even building a dam fitted with thousands of nuclear powered pumps across the Bering Straits.
Originally posted by WonderBoi
For the person that said: "believe in a better world", let me show you, what TPTB "believe" in your land of make-believe.Not sure why ANY of you would side with these mad scientists, regarding weather modification. You're the same people that scream how evil the banking system is, when they need another one of their bailouts. WHICH SIDE ARE YOU ON???????
In August of 1953 the United States formed the President’s Advisory Committee on Weather Control. Its stated purpose was Joplin Tornado Joplin Tornado to determine the effectiveness of weather modification procedures and the extent to which the government should engage in such activities. Methods that were envisioned by both American and Soviet scientists – and openly discussed in the media during the mid-1950s – included using colored pigments on the polar ice caps to melt them and unleash devastating floods, releasing large quantities of dust into the stratosphere creating precipitation on demand, and even building a dam fitted with thousands of nuclear powered pumps across the Bering Straits.
Is not the same statement as HAARP being used to "help" control the weather. Is it? They were thinking weather control was possible a long time ago; just like they thought flying was "possible" and look at that reality.
HAARP controlling the weather
You can keep DREAMING of a more positive world, if you want to, but history has shown me otherwise. And people have called me ignorant??? I may be ignorant, but you're still in denial.
Wishful thinking isn't going to cut it
Originally posted by WonderBoi
reply to post by flyswatter
Is not the same statement as HAARP being used to "help" control the weather. Is it? They were thinking weather control was possible a long time ago; just like they thought flying was "possible" and look at that reality.
HAARP controlling the weather
I SPECIFICALLY used the History Channel for a reason. I don't watch television. Haven't watched tv for more than 3 years. But, i bet you do. Even when research proves how bad t.v. is for the brain. I just thought it was INTERESTING that the NWO would reveal their plans to you. You can't say they didn't inform you, or you didn't know. See, from my understanding, the "illuminati", "NWO", "Elite", "whatever you chose to call TPTB", have to inform the sheeple, in their obscure little way, before they actually execute their plans. It's some kind of code that they have. It kinda makes them feel like they're being "fair" about destroying us. Look how we live. Oh, but i bet YOU'RE the exception, to the rule. People talking about fighting the fight, but still support the people that cause these wars. You still watch their PROGRAMMING. You still buy their fast foods. You still fill up at the pump. You still pay taxes, which funds the military industrial complex. You still support the very thing you protest against. Not sure how you're gonna win the battle, when you're supplying the enemy.
Originally posted by tsurfer2000h
reply to post by WonderBoi
You can keep DREAMING of a more positive world, if you want to, but history has shown me otherwise. And people have called me ignorant??? I may be ignorant, but you're still in denial.
We can see what history (channel) has shown you.
Are you sure they were talking about you and not this thread in general?
What are you saying were in denile about?
Wishful thinking isn't going to cut it
Kind of like the evidence you have provided in this thread...edit on 10-6-2013 by tsurfer2000h because: (no reason given)