It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Are you offering that as a criticism of the video? I was hoping someone could show that it was wrong.
4.) People with similar prejudices will herald it as truth.
I expect one of two courses for this thread. Either irrelevant objections will be made, or it will be ignored.
Originally posted by charles1952
reply to post by wildtimes
Dear wildtimes,
Ok, I've watched the video and read the responses. The criticisms of the argument of the video seem to come in three forms.
1.) They're all paid shills, trying to make money,
2.) Other religions are just as bad, and
3.) There are just a few bad apples.
I expect one of two courses for this thread. Either irrelevant objections will be made, or it will be ignored.
With respect,
Charles1952
Originally posted by charles1952
Ok, I've watched the video and read the responses. The criticisms of the argument of the video seem to come in three forms.
1.) They're all paid shills, trying to make money,
2.) Other religions are just as bad, and
3.) There are just a few bad apples.
I expect one of two courses for this thread. Either irrelevant objections will be made, or it will be ignored.
Which, of course, is the same as Objection #2, above. The video disagrees, claiming that Islam is the only religion teaching the death or subjugation of non-believers. That position is supported, in the video, by quotes from the religious books of Islam and its history.
Muslims want to take over earth terra with Islam.
Christians would like the same with Christianity.
And Jews would see the same with Judaism.
Which has nothing to do with the video at all. Further, I never claimed anything remotely like that.
So you beleive every single muslim is like that? Do you think all white protestants like you are all good as well?
I suppose you did not read the entire thread. Why re-invent the wheel?
I don't see you objecting to anyone else. Get that done first, then come to me with your version of events.
Originally posted by charles1952
The video disagrees, claiming that Islam is the only religion teaching the death or subjugation of non-believers.
Originally posted by babloyi
The documentary features Walid Shoebat? Yeah, before I invest almost 2 hours of my time, I gotta say, it is basically "debunked" right there. You can check the wiki page for him to see he's a basically a liar (he claimed to have bombed some bank in Israel, yet the bank itself AND Israeli authorities say that any such bombing never occured) and defrauder (he's taken tax money from the government to give lectures to secuirty forces based off his supposed "expertise", and he gets money from the public claiming it for charity, yet there is no charity registered by him, and he lied about having it registered. Heck, the simplest debunking of this character is just this: If he really WAS a terrorist who performed such terrorist activities, why on earth would he be freely parading around the US giving his hate-filled speeches, rather than be behind bars or extradited to Israel to be behind bars THERE? Because he "Saw the light and converted and stopped being a terrorist"? Suuuure, that would work .
Thanks for saving me from wasting my time
www.jpost.com...
edition.cnn.com...
www.washingtonpost.com...
What the West Needs to Know: There are charlatans and hucksters who want to drum up and make money off your fear- Don't fall for it!
I authored a thread about these people ages ago you might want to check out:
www.abovetopsecret.com...edit on 6-6-2013 by babloyi because: (no reason given)
Do you believe that pointing out that Walid Shoebat (used in the documentary as a "expert") is a liar (specifically on his claim of being an expert in Islam or terrorism or Islamic terrorism or extremism) and a fraudster (specifically in regards to his use of fear to make money) is an irrelevant objection?
Surely his "expertise" on the matter is then null and void.
Originally posted by charles1952
But, is he a liar? Yes, I watched the CNN interview and it raised questions. Mr. Shoebat then answered those questions in his rebuttal. In the light of this rebuttal, CNN's allegations seem weak and unconvincing.
shoebat.com...
Originally posted by charles1952
But more important than that, there were several people in the video with the same message, the Luton video doesn't mention him at all, and the interpretation of Islamic teachings (which is what the video was about) isn't related to terrorism expertise.
Originally posted by charles1952
Please, again. Instead of attacking one of the messengers, what are the significant errors in the two videos which make them false?
Spencer co-founded Stop Islamization of America (SIOA) and the Freedom Defense Initiative (FDI) with Pamela Geller in 2010. Both organizations are designated as hate groups by the Anti-defamation league and the Southern Poverty Law Center.
In the Summer 2011 issue of Intelligence Report, published by the SPLC, Robert Steinback listed Spencer as a member of the "anti-Muslim inner circle", noting that "Spencer has been known to fraternize with European racists and neo-fascists, though he says such contacts were merely incidental.
There is money in spreading hate.
Abraham Foxman of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) called Spencer and Geller American anti-Muslim writers because their writings "promote a conspiratorial anti-Muslim agenda under the pretext of fighting radical Islam. This belief system parallels the creation of an ideological — and far more deadly — form of anti-Semitism in the late 19th and early 20th centuries." He continued, "we must always be wary of those whose love for the Jewish people is born out of hatred of Muslims or Arabs."
In an October 2010 news article, an investigative report by The Tennessean described Spencer as one of several individuals who "...cash in on spreading hate and fear about Islam." Tennessean investigation concluded "IRS filings from 2008 show that Robert Spencer earned $132,537 from the David Horowitz Freedom Center, and Horowitz pocketed over $400,000 for himself in just one year".
Bat Ye’or: Anti-Muslim Loon with a Crazy Conspiracy Theory Named “Eurabia”
is not a scholar; she does not have the credentials of a historian from any recognized university. She is referred to as an “independent researcher,” a euphemism for a random person who goes to the library, opens up some books, and starts writing.
CNN’s Jerusalem bureau went to great lengths trying to verify Shoebat’s story. The Tel Aviv headquarters of Bank Leumi had no record of a firebombing at its now-demolished Bethlehem branch. Israeli police had no record of the bombing, and the prison where Shoebat says he was held “for a few weeks” for inciting anti-Israel demonstrations says it has no record of him being incarcerated there either.
He said his own family has vouched for his prison time. But relatives CNN spoke to described him as a “regular kid” who left home at 18, eventually becoming a computer programmer in the United States.
“Now, we aren’t saying every single mosque is potential terrorist headquarters. But if you look at certain reports by the Hudson report, 80 percent of mosques they found pamphlets and education on jihad. So they’re in the mosque, the mosque in accordance to the Muslim brotherhood is the command post and center.” The conservative Hudson Institute said it never issued such a report and has no idea why its name was invoked.
Originally posted by charles1952
reply to post by wildtimes
Dear wildtimes,
Ok, I've watched the video and read the responses. The criticisms of the argument of the video seem to come in three forms.
1.) They're all paid shills, trying to make money,
2.) Other religions are just as bad, and
3.) There are just a few bad apples.
I expect one of two courses for this thread. Either irrelevant objections will be made, or it will be ignored.
With respect,
Charles1952
Article 2 of The Universal Declaration of Human Rights
•Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.