Obama: Gay Sex, Drugs & Execution Style Murders

reply to post by EarthCitizen07

Well, you may have a point there...and I respect your opinion.

I'm also trying to show respect for the op ...as it hit me, I was about to go into a line of discussion which, just in my own contributions, would take at least a few pages to properly present and lay out in a meaningful way. I suggested the person demanding this start their own thread, so the topic could be more fully explored in the appropriate setting and without basically tearing apart this one ...which wasn't started to focus narrowly on the Birther argument.

I'd like to think that is a proper way of handling the matter ...and I'd still welcome the opportunity on a new thread where such a wide ranging and lengthy response would be fitting to the topic it's made for.

Originally posted by OutonaLimb

Originally posted by EarthCitizen07

Originally posted by OutonaLimb
obama was made to be broken. the only question left is when
'they' have decided that it all comes toppling down.

everything about this man is faker than a fake pair of fake boobs.

Well to be honest I am glad he won and not romney.

You have a better chance to survive a tarantula bite than a rattlesnake bite.

If romney was president he would have become the new "yes sir of israel" and that speaks for itself.

Other than THAT both are exactly the same. Same coin but different sides. Heads or tails?

they were the same side of the same coin. the set-up illusion just
gave a different impression is all.

with the sloppy fakery and his-story backmasking, obummer was always built up to be
taken down and out, eventually. do you really think they could not have done a much, much
way, way better job?

israel, like o-bollock, is a sockpuppet, frontman, patsy, fallguy etc. etc.
make no mistake. we need to look beyond, at say... the roman empire.

Not exactly the same but pretty damm close. Anyone that sides with israel is a big hazard to world security. That is the only positive thing about democrats. I still say two sides of the same coin. The coin is the same and it is the evil "democrat-republican" coin. There are many coins to choose from but media does not get paid to push their views anywhere as much as they should. The first amendment is grossely misinterpretated to include monetary contributions rather than SPEECH ALONE. I consider speech to be when someone opens their mouth and when someone drops a ballet, not "voting" with money.

reply to post by Wrabbit2000


Thanks. Gave you a star. I am guilty of going off-topic sometimes but not to derail threads, only to add substance to them by expanding the conversation into parallel avenues that are somewhat related.

I think the scariest thing about this rumor is this:

There are people so bigoted against homosexuals that a man had to kill witnesses to hide his past.

Not the drugs, not murder, not molesting kids. Simple experiencing sexuality as he desired with consenting adults and people had to die in order to sweep it under the rug.

That being said I do not believe these rumors are true. No proof, just a hunch. I dislike everything about the current PotUS, but this would be too big to hide.

It is a rumor and it really says a lot about our population that a rumor like this even exists.

Originally posted by EricR

Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic

That is not his birth certificate. It's a graphical representation in digital form of his birth certificate. Only a documents expert could tell if it's real or fake and only if he had his hands on the ACTUAL document, not a picture made of dots.

Apparently a number of commercial experts and some law enforcement types disagree with you.

Care to name these "commercial experts" and 'law enforcement types" that actually claim it is Obama's real birth certificate and not a graphical representation in digital form of his birth certificate?

We know that Obama had early ties to the CIA.

We do? How about posting this "evidence"?

So far, you have not produced any solid material refuting my position.

Well, you have produced nothing to refute....

How about a court case number where the case was decided on Attorney Taitz's evidence?

What evidence? Taitz has no evidence, only lies and made up silly stories. How about you tell us a court case where the judgement did not consider Taitz's evidence.... remember, you are the one making the silly claims so you should be able to back those claims up!

Well listen. I mean, if you want to be part of the club and rule, you have to let the group own you. The best way is to do scandalous things so that you can be destroyed if you don't follow the rules. I hear Ted Kennedy was into young girls and coke.

This is the rumor anyway. Many believe that to belong to elite leadership, you have to be made. Like the Mafia.

Maybe Obama went for the back seat blow. Maybe he liked it. Maybe not. People usually believe what they want.

If you're straight and you go to a gay club, you are simply going to a straight club that happens to have a lot of gay people.

Who cares if Obama likes drugs and sex with males. I am more worried about the federal reserve and agencies that are actually controlling this country.

Who gives a damn about Obama's past or present sexual preferences, or drug use? The deciders probably have had every modern day President jacked up on meth or speed in order for them to stay awake during their very demanding schedule anyway.

People only need look into Obama's connections with the International Banksters that is really the root of our problem here in The USA, and abroad. Course, Obama is just a puppet who is controlled by many, many strings. ~$heopleNation

Originally posted by ausername
Unfortunately without undeniable, conclusive proof allegations like these can easily be spun off as a pure politically motivated hit piece.
.

edit on 4-5-2013 by ausername because: (no reason given)

Obama is a genius. The secretly gay president, who didn't come out of the closet, so that he could win office and secretly fight for gay rights. That was the play. And it won the gay vote. That's the trick. How appeal to all sides at the same time. In the gay community, denying you're gay while practicing in the backroom, is a norm and understood, and empathized with. So, all Obama did, was pay someone to claim he had secret relations with him, which he would, of course, openly deny, and he captures both sides of the opposite opinion. I wouldn't be surprised if Obama did meet with this fellow to discuss terms of the arrangement. But, as to actual gay activity, I seriously doubt, since why would a Senator risk a brief encounter with a total stranger, and have all these aids and other people around to witness? When Senator Larry Craig got caught trying to hook a total gay stranger in the restroom he was trying to do so without people knowing. But, having someone "arrange" the meeting, with a stranger passing through leaves a trail for others to follow. So, you wouldn't do that unless you wanted to give the impression that there was some gay action. Obama was deliberately leaving "clues" for the twisted imaginations of the gay community to hitch onto, feeding their hopes for that possible gay rights change. Needless to say, he did thank them properly for the vote, afterwords, by defending their rights, lest some of them got upset at being played. Obama was trying to create friends, not enemies, so he's constantly trying to appeal to everybody, even to republicans. Given that America voted for him twice, he must have been doing something right.

I'm still not seeing any actual, you know, evidence.

I wonder how Michelle Obama felt when she got the letter from Sinclair describing Obama's genitals. That wound be some very good evidence, but then again it's hard to tell how many people have seen and can describe his private areas. Hell, even the VP made a point to let everyone know he saw him naked.

I haven't read the book, but my copy is in the mail. Here is one of the reviews from Amazon.

I just got through reading the book "Barack Obama and Larry Sinclair: Cocaine, Sex, Lies & Murder?" and I believe every word of it. Not because I did not vote for Obama and because "I want to believe" that its true but because of all the "coverup" concerning Obama.To me the "sex and coc aine use" is not that shocking. Obama said he did coc aine when in High School, Larry Sinclair says Obama did it in 1999. So Obama lied, this is not the only lie he tells the American people. Sinclair says that in 1999 he had oral sex with Obama. Again, no shocker, so Obama is bi-sexual and had an affair 10 yrs ago while marrried. Bill Clinton got BJ's underneath the desk in the Oval Office while married, two wrongs don't make it right and I am in no way condoning it, but also not shocked by it. For the people who say that this book is just a "repeat" from what Sinclair told on Youtube and at the NPC I say you are wrong if you only concentrate on the sex and the coc aine.What is a LOT more important to me is how the media, reporters, the Obama machine are COVERING UP for Obama. Sinclair gives names of each reporter from different news agencies who repeatedly contacted him including from the NY Times, he gives names from the Obama camp, names of people who threatened him and his family. Phone numbers and copies of documents. THAT to me is more important than the sex and coc aine. Obama is not the first nor the last married man/politician engaging in this behavior, and it happened 10 yrs ago.The COVER UP for Obama NOW is the most alarming to me. Which tells me and IMO is the SAME cover up as they are covering up about his birth certificate.Larry Sinclair never changed his story, he stuck by it despite the death threats to him and his family, and I do believe him.Last but not least about the polygraph Sinclair supposely failed you can read about that fraud in the book. Even if he had REALLY failed it, so what? Its not admissable in a court of law anyway.Larry Sinclair did not hide anything about his criminal past, he is an open book, unlike Obama who IMO has lots of things to hide.And what about Michelle Obama?? Why does she roll over?? She got the letter from Sinclair describing her husband's genitals. A copy of the letter as well as a copy of the "registered mail" receipt to the White House as well as the person who signed for this letter is in the book. Why is Sinclair NOT sued??? Could it be because its true????

Pladuim

Originally posted by AngryCymraeg
I'm still not seeing any actual, you know, evidence.

Perhaps that's because all the evidence was terminated with extreme prejudice.

Think about it.

Originally posted by micpsi
Perhaps that's because all the evidence was terminated with extreme prejudice.

No, how about there is no actual evidence, just silly claims from the Obama haters. All their silly birfer nonsense has failed miserably, so now they are trying some other nonsense!

Originally posted by hellobruce

Originally posted by micpsi
Perhaps that's because all the evidence was terminated with extreme prejudice.

No, how about there is no actual evidence, just silly claims from the Obama haters. All their silly birfer nonsense has failed miserably, so now they are trying some other nonsense!

Plug your ears, sing the la la la song, that's the liberal way. Where there is smoke, there is fire, and there is a big flaming one coming from the White House closet.

Pladuim

reply to post by Pladuim


I'm still not seeing any actual evidence.

Just a few comments. Yes, i think those guys executed in Chicago had ties to Obama. And I think that Love guy is his gay lover. I don't have a problem with his being gay, but the murders and the fact that its kept secret and used to control him is a huge problem. Thats treason. So we have a POTUS that is controlled and an election that was rigged by voter fraud. At least twice, more if you count Bush 43. And I'll toss Clinton in there too, his affairs left a disturbing number of bodies turning up dead. Not to mention Vince Foster and Ron Brown.
So we have a boob POTUS with a faked reputation of scholarship and intelligence, one that was pushed and got everywhere he did through friends and favors. Honestly, its a waste of time voting anymore above the local elections. Unless its well past close the vote tallies will be counted to be within 1% and you'll have an upset and faked polls to back them up. And both parties are working in collusion for the same masters so thats even less reason to vote.

Originally posted by Dutchowl
Yes, i think those guys executed in Chicago had ties to Obama.

Still no evidence

And I think that Love guy is his gay lover

Again no evidence at all.

Thats treason

You again show you have no clue at all what you post

So we have a POTUS that is controlled

and an election that was rigged by voter fraud.

No evidence the election was rigged

with a faked reputation of scholarship and intelligence,

Still no evidence....

So all you have are silly claims and no evidence whatsoever!

Originally posted by hellobruce
So all you have are silly claims and no evidence whatsoever!

edit on 6-5-2013 by hellobruce because: (no reason given)

Hey Bruce,

What evidence do you have that it's not true?

And remember nobody on ATS is making these claims!

We are just discussing what has already been claimed in an open forum!

But for the fact that Sinclair was willing to submit to a polygraph speaks volumes!

And for the fact that the polygraph results were tampered with, warrants further investigation.

Not to mention the mother of the murder victim that is speaking out, was a former member of the Chicago PD.
(Should make her somewhat credible even to you!)

And finally Sinclair is giving startling details, if the phone records he specified were investigated, it could put this thing to rest, and if he was lying, Sinclair could face charges for slander and defamation of character at very least.

But this has not happened. ?

Makes you say Hmmmmm.....

Originally posted by ReAwakened
What evidence do you have that it's not true?

I am not the one making the silly claims, it is up to those making the claims to back those claims up with evidence.... which they are unable to do!

But for the fact that Sinclair was willing to submit to a polygraph speaks volumes!

not really, polygraphs are useless, no court accepts them as valid, in fact most countries do not even use them, they are very easily beaten, just ask Ames.

But this has not happened. ?
Makes you say Hmmmmm.....

Because it is just a silly made up story.

Originally posted by hellobruce

Originally posted by ReAwakened
What evidence do you have that it's not true?

I am not the one making the silly claims, it is up to those making the claims to back those claims up with evidence.... which they are unable to do!

But for the fact that Sinclair was willing to submit to a polygraph speaks volumes!

not really, polygraphs are useless, no court accepts them as valid, in fact most countries do not even use them, they are very easily beaten, just ask Ames.

But this has not happened. ?
Makes you say Hmmmmm.....

Because it is just a silly made up story.

Is that you Barry?