It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SubTruth
reply to post by BobM88
At the end of the day do people believe the TPTB are telling them the truth? Are these numbers really good news?
I don't trust progressives.edit on 3-5-2013 by SubTruth because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by BobM88
Originally posted by TauCetixeta
Originally posted by BobM88
reply to post by TauCetixeta
Too bad Harry wouldn't have realized this before pushing so hard to get it passed!
Nobody read the bill ! Now there are 27,000 more pages for someone to read!
AND the solution is to hire an Army of " Navigators " to explain it us?
The " Navigators " are a Secular Progressive Ruse.
Do i have to read all of these pages???
Do i have to read every page? Wouldn't it be easier if i just jump head first into
the Grand Canyon?edit on 3-5-2013 by TauCetixeta because: (no reason given)
OMG! That's what 27,000 pages looks like? How in the hell (pardon my language) can anyone....it doesn't seem possible to be able to actually know what's in there. What would a summary of that look like? 3,000 pages? That's madness. Sheer madness to pass a law that big. Wouldn't it make more sense to pass more smaller laws? I don't know, maybe it's my ignorance of these things shining through, but that seems insane to me.
Originally posted by Afterthought
reply to post by BobM88
I appreciate your positive attitude, but I believe the number of unemployed has dropped only because people have fallen out of the system and aren't collecting unemployment benefits anymore.
According to this, it's 13.9%
portalseven.com...
The nine largest banks have in excess of $220 trillion in derivative exposure. This is more than three times the size of the global economy. Bank of New York Mellon (BK) has an exposure of $1.375 trillion, State Street Financial (STT) has an exposure of $1.390 trillion, Morgan Stanley (MS) has an exposure of $1.722 trillion, Wells Fargo (WFC) has an exposure of $3.332 trillion, and HSBC (HBC) has an exposure of $4.321 trillion. These five banks pale in comparison to the other four banks. Goldman Sachs (GS) has an exposure of $44.192 trillion, Bank of America (BAC) has an exposure of $50.135 trillion, Citibank (C) has an exposure of $52.102 trillion, and JP Morgan Chase (JPM) has an exposure of $70.151 trillion. Five of the most trusted banks account for over 95% of the risky bets that are known as derivatives.
So, what does this mean in layman's terms? Many of the top banks are far too overexposed in the bets they have made. The top banks seem to be addicted to gambling and the bets they are making are increasingly risky. Derivatives have come under public scrutiny recently with JPMorgan's $2 billion trading loss on a derivatives trade. Jamie Dimon was forced to apologize and several people left over the trade. This trade has been called a colossal error, however, it was practically nothing of the true exposure banks like JPMorgan have to the derivative markets. It is a very dangerous game that these five banks are playing, and if everything goes wrong, they do not have the money to pay for the derivative bets they are making.
A key effort in the Dodd-Frank financial reform act has been to bring transparency and reforms to the complex, shadowy market of derivatives. On Wednesday, however, Republicans and Democrats on the House Agriculture Committee approved seven bills that would roll back parts of the Dodd-Frank financial regulations. The bills will now proceed to a floor vote.
Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
Originally posted by Trueman
reply to post by BobM88
Not even want to read the source. To publish stats is a dirty old trick played for all governments, it always works.
Unemployment rates fall when underemployment rate goes up.
We have people accepting to work at 8$ per hour in jobs that worth 12$ per hour or more.
There is a new unnamed working class with less than 40 hours a week, but still considered full time workers.
Not even want to mention the millions working just 15/20 hours part time jobs.
Consider the term "Cook the books".
This. Even if people are working, so many of these newly created jobs and hires are part time, minimum wage crap. Which isn't a great health indicator for the economy. People working such jobs often still have to collect benefits to keep afloat, especially if you live in more expensive areas.
Originally posted by roguetechie
reply to post by BobM88
Actually this jobs report is HORRIFIC if you actually tabulate anything besides the raw numbers of jobs!
Once you dig down into the report you see that while yes 165000 jobs were created this month the average hours worked by employees has dropped ....
Unfortunately it's dropped at a rate that JUST TO BREAK EVEN would have required almost 3/4 of a million jobs to be created last month just to make up for the cut in hours suffered by those already working!
And realistically the only reason we are seeing a hiring expansion AT ALL right now is due to policies embedded within obamacare which is forcing many employers to cut the hours of their full time employees wherever possible to get them exemptions or knocked into brackets within obamacare which will not bankrupt them!
So essentially while more jobs may have showed up the quality of the jobs and the amount of full time jobs has went DOWN precipitously!
So NO this job report is NOT good! It is in fact a very very bad sign of an economy that is taking one more colossal hammer blow at a time when it is already staggering under the weight of dozens of other major issues!
Implications of today's Job's report
Originally posted by FissionSurplus
reply to post by TauCetixeta
Rah rah siss boom bah! Keep on cheerleading. Even when their team is losing badly, cheerleaders are supposed to keep up a happy smile until the buzzer sounds at the end. Then they can go and cry in private.
I'll be here with a box of tissues for you when that happens.
Originally posted by TauCetixeta
reply to post by Agent_USA_Supporter
Our USA growth may slow but we are not falling into a recession.
Go check Europe.
The bottom line looks like this: The economists project, on average, that the economy will grow 2.1% from the fourth quarter of 2007 to the end of 2008, vs. 2.6% in 2007. Only two of the forecasters expect a recession, although it might feel like one if there's sluggish growth over the next couple of quarters, as many predict. Almost all think the risk of a downturn has risen substantially in recent months.
Almost all "no recession" forecasts are predicated on further rate cuts by the Fed. The target rate is expected to drop from 4.25% to between 2.5% and 4%, with almost half of the analysts projecting it to fall below 4%. The yield curve will steepen a bit, as 10-year Treasuries edge up to 4.5% by yearend.