It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NoJoker13
reply to post by Cobaltic1978
As of today: legalinsurrection.com...
But if you can't 'believe' anything anyone writes what's the point of reading it anyway, as stated in my previous post there has to be some trust here.edit on 29-4-2013 by NoJoker13 because: (no reason given)
For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. -- " Ephesians 6:12
Originally posted by MrxMulder
How about stripping us even more from our rights and taking more away from our "freedom" to keep us "safe" from their own creations? How about to show the masses that martial law isn't so bad after all?
Originally posted by NoJoker13
These threads are becoming a disturbing and a disgusting trend here on ATS. Without any 'actual' proof, except for SUSPICIONS and INCONSISTENCIESedit on 29-4-2013 by NoJoker13 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Rubic0n
Originally posted by NoJoker13
These threads are becoming a disturbing and a disgusting trend here on ATS. Without any 'actual' proof, except for SUSPICIONS and INCONSISTENCIESedit on 29-4-2013 by NoJoker13 because: (no reason given)
So people here should just shut up and not discuss this and wait for proof to be handed to them. What do you expect then , that people on ATS only report fox news articles as fact? because you know , it cannot be taken into question or discussed in anyway. How do you suppose details and facts are uncovered? By being silent about it?
The fox news forums might be a better place for you then ATS i think.
Originally posted by Ghost375
Originally posted by Rubic0n
Originally posted by NoJoker13
These threads are becoming a disturbing and a disgusting trend here on ATS. Without any 'actual' proof, except for SUSPICIONS and INCONSISTENCIESedit on 29-4-2013 by NoJoker13 because: (no reason given)
So people here should just shut up and not discuss this and wait for proof to be handed to them. What do you expect then , that people on ATS only report fox news articles as fact? because you know , it cannot be taken into question or discussed in anyway. How do you suppose details and facts are uncovered? By being silent about it?
The fox news forums might be a better place for you then ATS i think.
There's a difference between questioning and analyzing the story....and making the claim that it is 100% fact that this was done by the government. (while the OP uses "possible" many posters are saying it's "100%" the government)edit on 29-4-2013 by Ghost375 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Rubic0n
And?
But it is ok for you to claim that it was 100% sure not the government right ?
Get real
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by Ghost375
You said,
Get real
So I got a video that shows the effects of a real bomb comparable to the one in Boston.
IMO randyvs is like EF Hutton; when he talks, I listen!
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by Ghost375
No, it's obvious they used some type of device. That filled the air with smoke.
To cover up what was going on in the dense smoke and directing the blast up ward.
i guess you don't see the difference in the effects ?
And about you video, why does the guy with the Camera keep saying oh my Gawd !
When there isn't anything there to have that type of reaction ? It's really hokey !edit on 29-4-2013 by randyvs because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by NickDC202
Awe thanks Nick, but you may want be careful. I been getting called a lot of names lately.
Originally posted by Bundy
Ghost, how is the gov. stripping us of our freedoms a vague motive? Sounds clear to me. Just because you can't possibly be persuaded to think that it's happening doesn't mean its vague. Btw, I don't believe in ghosts.
One other thing.. Why couldn't they show us a video and then us it as evidence in a court case? I don't understand that, but im no lawyer. They show videos on the news of bank robbers and then I would assume they use said videos in their court cases. They even show pics on the news and court tv of stuff they are using in the Jodi Arias trial as they are being used in court. Please someone explain...