It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Indigo5
reply to post by CIAGypsy
Start another thread or post on an existing thread. This thread is not about the legality of the searches in Boston...which as I understand it...they ASKED homeowners to search property...but a back and forth here is DERAILMENT from the OP topic.
Originally posted by CIAGypsy
Originally posted by Indigo5
reply to post by CIAGypsy
Start another thread or post on an existing thread. This thread is not about the legality of the searches in Boston...which as I understand it...they ASKED homeowners to search property...but a back and forth here is DERAILMENT from the OP topic.
You brought it up. Your quote....now you can't defend your own statement.
Classy....
At some point in the morning, they reconvened at a staging area and were deployed to a new search zone. In all, Saia guesses they went through 100 houses, many of them two-family homes. Over and over, they knocked on doors and asked to search inside.
“Most of the time ... it was, ‘Yeah, please come in, please check it out.’ People were extremely helpful. They really wanted that extra sense of security that nobody was in their house.” Along the way, he said they met a lot of “very scared people.”
When a homeowner said there was no need to search, they looked hard at the individual and situation to make sure the person wasn’t acting under duress, that the suspect wasn’t inside.
When nobody answered a knock, they checked around the house for signs of forced entry or anything that looked suspicious
Originally posted by TrowaBarton
In closing I will concede you this point, he may not be the right person. But something did happen and with all of these other strange happenings it really does make me wonder.
Trowa
Originally posted by CIAGypsy
reply to post by Indigo5
It is my understanding that Beck's source for the story is Congressman Duncan. The evidence about the event file and the 212 3B is classified information and cannot be released to the public.
The information surrounding what DID or DID NOT happen in regards to this individual and the intel gathered on him is CLASSIFIED. Do you understand what that means???? It means you cry foul all day long that the story is not real because Beck has not produced the CLASSIFIED file to show you proof. Doesn't mean it's real. Doesn't mean Beck isn't full of B.S.
A senior law enforcement official with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) told TheBlaze Thursday that reports claiming the department was deporting Abdul Rahman Ali Alharbi under section 212 3B (“security and related grounds”) and had opened an “event” (or file) on the Saudi Arabian national following the Boston attacks is “categorically false.”
Originally posted by Kali74
reply to post by Rubic0n
Now is a bad time to be a low information American.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by Indigo5
Um, dismissing someone or information from them because of their "bias" is a circumstantial ad hominem fallacy.;
Originally posted by blamethegreys
Oh shiiiiiiiit. Some people better suck it up.
www.theblaze.com...
SO I lied to you last week, but trust me on this. This is really what happened.edit on 23-4-2013 by blamethegreys because: (no reason given)
“Before the [Tsarnaev] brothers became the focus of the investigation, authorities questioned a Saudi student who reportedly was on a terror watchlist,” Grassley said. “I sent a letter to you this morning asking for answers to questions about the bombers and how they interacted with your agency, I trust you will promptly respond…” “With regard to the Saudi student, was he on a watchlist, and if so, how did he obtain a student visa?” Grassley asked. Napolitano firmly responded: “He was not on a watchlist. What happened is — this student was, really when you back it out, he was in the wrong place at the wrong time. He was never a subject. He was never even really a person of interest. Because he was being interviewed, he was at that point put on a watchlist, and then when it was quickly determined he had nothing to do with the bombing, the watch listing status was removed.” [Emphasis added]
Originally posted by Indigo5
Originally posted by CIAGypsy
Originally posted by Indigo5
reply to post by CIAGypsy
Start another thread or post on an existing thread. This thread is not about the legality of the searches in Boston...which as I understand it...they ASKED homeowners to search property...but a back and forth here is DERAILMENT from the OP topic.
You brought it up. Your quote....now you can't defend your own statement.
Classy....
I brought it up as relevant to Glen Beck's witch hunt...but WTF if you want to press....Your claim is BS too...
Now...aside from a effen youtube video where you can't hear the conversation...please provide ANY evidence that the Watertown sweeps involved a single case of illegal search.
edit on 23-4-2013 by Indigo5 because: (no reason given)
Pictures speak louder than words.
Originally posted by BlueAjah
Originally posted by blamethegreys
Oh shiiiiiiiit. Some people better suck it up.
www.theblaze.com...
SO I lied to you last week, but trust me on this. This is really what happened.edit on 23-4-2013 by blamethegreys because: (no reason given)
Wow.
Janet Napolitano talks in such circles I wonder if even she knows what she is actually saying.
But it sounds like - she knows more than she will say, and is talking around things on purpose.
She does now admit that the Saudi student was put on the watch list after the attack, then quickly removed.
But WHY?
Originally posted by Taggart
Pictures speak louder than words.
Originally posted by Rubic0n
Originally posted by BlueAjah
Originally posted by blamethegreys
Oh shiiiiiiiit. Some people better suck it up.
www.theblaze.com...
SO I lied to you last week, but trust me on this. This is really what happened.edit on 23-4-2013 by blamethegreys because: (no reason given)
Wow.
Janet Napolitano talks in such circles I wonder if even she knows what she is actually saying.
But it sounds like - she knows more than she will say, and is talking around things on purpose.
She does now admit that the Saudi student was put on the watch list after the attack, then quickly removed.
But WHY?
Because he was there and of middle eastern origin who is here on a visa, Other then that ,he was being questioned as a witness. No clues to participation were found and so he got removed from the list. He is still on record as being questioned.
Originally posted by ManBehindTheMask
Originally posted by Rubic0n
Originally posted by BlueAjah
Originally posted by blamethegreys
Oh shiiiiiiiit. Some people better suck it up.
www.theblaze.com...
SO I lied to you last week, but trust me on this. This is really what happened.edit on 23-4-2013 by blamethegreys because: (no reason given)
Wow.
Janet Napolitano talks in such circles I wonder if even she knows what she is actually saying.
But it sounds like - she knows more than she will say, and is talking around things on purpose.
She does now admit that the Saudi student was put on the watch list after the attack, then quickly removed.
But WHY?
Because he was there and of middle eastern origin who is here on a visa, Other then that ,he was being questioned as a witness. No clues to participation were found and so he got removed from the list. He is still on record as being questioned.
except for the fact that he was already tagged AS a terrorist.......someone KNOWN .....and given a visa to go to school but wasnt living in the state or city where he was suppose to be going to school....
And just so happened to be there where the bombings took place......
Seriously come on people........
Originally posted by sad_eyed_lady
So has this guy been deported or not? Glenn Beck says DHS today claims they have no idea where he is.
What?