Boston ISN'T a Farce at all...

reply to post by Echtelion


Learn to use google as stated about ten times now, shouldn't be too hard to search for evidence to this point, and a timeline, and what parties were involved. If you'd like someone to hold your hand it'll cost you $9.99 a minute with additional charges for gratuity and a ham sandwich.

reply to post by Indigo5


Great posts, although I know where the information can be found the link you posted is just one outlet that identified these men. Hopefully he has a speedy recovery, at least as much as can be expected.

reply to post by Hadrian


Well written Hadrian, absolutely enjoyed the post! My thoughts exactly, bored maybe, cynical probably.

reply to post by WanDash


Side-step there's one a few pages back, look harder. Since when I type that into google I already see 10. Although you may think my news venues lack credibility so you decide to 'over-look' them.

Originally posted by NoJoker13
...Side-step there's one a few pages back, look harder. Since when I type that into google I already see 10. Although you may think my news venues lack credibility so you decide to 'over-look' them.

Good at accusations aren't you?
Which page would that be on...and, is it a post of yours, or someone-else's?
Thanks in advance, again.

reply to post by WanDash


Bloomberg article 2 pages back, or 1 page getting jumbled here. I didn't post it someone else did, although I read it earlier in the week. A very small piece of the much larger collaborative puzzle.

Originally posted by unknown known
reply to post by muzzleflash

 

Exactly, I know if a suspected terrorist is on the loose in my city, and I am at home with my family, I will make sure my home is secure myself. I don't need to hide in a room until the big bad swat can come sweep my house. There is absolutely no need WHATSOEVER to have law enforcement/fbi/swat/national guard/marines or anybody SEARCH MY HOME!

edit on 22-4-2013 by unknown known because: (no reason given)

What if the shooter hides in your home, taking you and your family hostage while he's hiding withing your family?
You never thought about this?

Are there any photos on the internet that the FBI agent claimed to see? I'm still wanting to see the incriminating photos and video. What's the saying on ATS? "pics or it didn't happen."

Originally posted by NoJoker13
...Bloomberg article 2 pages back, or 1 page getting jumbled here. I didn't post it someone else did, although I read it earlier in the week. A very small piece of the much larger collaborative puzzle.

Well - I'm sorry, but...that doesn't cut it for me. May for you, and that's your right.
I have numerous "official timelines" downloaded from the Boston Globe. And by that, I mean - they are each "different".
You know what happens in court when someone's story changes? I'm sure you do... The credibility of their testimony is questioned...intensely. If someone tells you "three people were fighting outside my front door", and later, you read the newspaper, and it states that the same three people were fighting three blocks away from the first teller's house...WHO DO YOU BELIEVE?
Guess you have to believe the newspaper... Right? That's official. No reason (note the underlining here - that you are aware of, or want to believe) for them to "lie"... They surely wouldn't have printed an erroneous article, with nothing to gain for the "effort".
So - you question the integrity of the person that told you another story.
Go to an innocent scenario...
I coached football a number of years ago. The people paid to report the game's outcomes and statistics, stood to gain nothing (or very little) for misreporting... IT WAS THEIR JOB/s to pay attention, and report what happened. And week after week...they continuously "got it wrong". All the way from those that were co-horts of mine, to reporters for the major metropolitan newspapers...and including the governing body for said sport in that state.
If I had not stayed on top of it...and reviewed the film every week...often frame by frame...some of those players would have been cheated dramatically.
Anyway - my entire point is - You began this with a call to shut down all questioning of the official story. Law enforcement suspected the right people...and got them.
As I stated in my initial reply - "You may be right". And, while I have no reason to believe that you are wrong (in that opinion)...I am not satisfied that the answer is as simple as you do.
Thanks for taking the time.

reply to post by WanDash


You wouldn't expect a time line in this type of situation to change? I mean they also had 'identified' then released 'suspect' after 'suspect' which would also change throughout an investigation. I never said that article was singularly "good enough" for me I did although say it is a piece of a much larger puzzle all of which led back to these two. There's many more articles of others coming to the same conclusion, as I have my right you have yours I just choose to believe that the sources that arrived at the conclusion are credible enough to respect. If your 'other' finds are as well I'll be happy to read them.

Originally posted by NoJoker13
You wouldn't expect a time line in this type of situation to change? I mean they also had 'identified' then released 'suspect' after 'suspect' which would also change throughout an investigation. I never said that article was singularly "good enough" for me I did although say it is a piece of a much larger puzzle all of which led back to these two. There's many more articles of others coming to the same conclusion, as I have my right you have yours I just choose to believe that the sources that arrived at the conclusion are credible enough to respect. If your 'other' finds are as well I'll be happy to read them.

You have presumed from my first reply, that I have another axe to grind. I do not. Should I come up with one, I will certainly let you know. Your source is good enough for you...? That's fine with me.
I may be more disgusted, than you, with a lot of what comes out in the many threads (both on ATS and outside), since I have not been satisfied with the answers. Too much mixing and matching... People using photos from the first blast scene to call foul at the second blast scene.
The picture of the "bag" in front of the railing...at the second blast scene...yet...the "incriminating" photo of the younger brother...shows the "backpack" well behind the railing (probably leaning against the base of the tree).
This - to me - is a jigsaw puzzle... All the pieces may already be on the table...but very few of them are "in order", some are turned-over, some that look similar have been mistakenly "put together"...and I don't see the picture very clearly, under the current arrangement.
Again - if you do - kudos.
Just asking for a little room to get comfortable, here.

Why are these threads not getting shut down like the sandy hook threads?

There where many more unanswered questions surrounding the sandy hook shooting than the boston marathon bombing. Yet the bombing threads are allowed to keep going eventhough the evidence pointing to a conspiracy is pretty thin.

Also, where are all the people demanding that conspiracy theories NOT be discussed out of respect for the victims and their families? Why so much discussion on the boston bombing but when people tried to discuss sandy hook it was immediately shut down out of respect towards those victims families?

reply to post by WanDash


I never said you had "an axe to grind", if my assumption about you was wrong your not doing a whole lot to change it. You've also made quite a few assumptions about me such as the "good enough" statement I already pointed out. I also pointed out that if you had contradictory evidence to the current excepted 'fact' that I would be happy to read it and take from it what I can. To that you just seem angry about what I'm not sure, you state it's a lack of evidence and a search for 'truth' but I think there is something more to your quarrel. Maybe I'm making assumptions, maybe I'm spot on, again if you have something to present I'll be happy to review it.

reply to post by Nicks87


That is the purpose of this thread, to show that the evidence is in favor of the direct story, not sure if you read the Op. I agree with your post and that is the reason I made this thread, many are trying to make a conspiracy where there isn't one.

Originally posted by NoJoker13
...I never said you had "an axe to grind", if my assumption about you was wrong your not doing a whole lot to change it. You've also made quite a few assumptions about me such as the "good enough" statement I already pointed out. I also pointed out that if you had contradictory evidence to the current excepted 'fact' that I would be happy to read it and take from it what I can. To that you just seem angry about what I'm not sure, you state it's a lack of evidence and a search for 'truth' but I think there is something more to your quarrel. Maybe I'm making assumptions, maybe I'm spot on, again if you have something to present I'll be happy to review it.

You did not say I had an axe to grind.
However, I can see that you have not understood my "intention" from the start...and I will take responsibility for that. My simple point is - You have arrived at your conclusion, and have disdained those that do not agree (or that have not arrived at the same conclusion in the same amount of time). That is not ALL you said...and, again, as I've said repeatedly - I agree with many of your frustrations.
Many (most?) of the "outlandish" claims & accusations regarding this tragedy, are zealously religious about their interpretation/s of every event that comes across the ticker... I can't do anything about that...and you can't do anything about that. The only thing I can do, is sift through the heaps of irrelevant information and opinion that comes in...and hope to gain something (insight, new information, education, etc...).
As an aside...and hopefully, you'll receive it in the spirit intended...but...your avatar is terribly distracting, and makes me lean toward disliking you before even considering what you say. Wish I weren't that "flippant" but...just saying...
Wish you well.
Hope all turns out well in Boston!

After a day of looking into this i come to the conclusion it was staged.. Read this article

______beforeitsnews/alternative/2013/04/actors-directors-and-bloody-squibs-was-the-boston-bombing-pure-hollywood-2627154.html

In the last set of pictures the persons dismembered legs are rubbing on the bloke with the hoodie, he would be COVERED in blood, he doesnt have a drop of blood on him in last photo..

And last but not least... They #ed up and used the same actor portraying 2 different witnesses at both "events"..

www.youtube.com...

reply to post by Mayhem420


Full amputations rarely result in massive blood loss, the body does everything it can to stop the blood flow to the area when a limb is lost, along with one of his arteries being pinched and having a tourniquet, also the man is in obvious shock, real life isn't like the movies

Originally posted by NoJoker13
reply to post by ColoradoJens

 

I know first hand the citizens didn't have a problem, at least the vast majority, to me that's all that matters not the opinions of the backwoods of America. A sacrifice to end the problem, an a half day for the people of Boston wasn't much to give for it.

Originally posted by Telos

"The easiest way [for a Chechen radicalist terrorist] to gain control of a population is to carry out acts of terror. The public will clamor for such laws if their personal security is threatened."