It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I am not really in love with this world. It's been rough on me, and though I endure pretty well, I draw the line at having my daily activities dictated to me. I will not conform, except to Natural Law. Fictions of law have no power against me, and if men who believe in such delusions want to take my life away for my insistence on being free, let them. They can have this madhouse, and good riddance to them.
Originally posted by skorpius
You cannot stop this train, only option is to conform or die.
A Justice Department official says the Boston Marathon bombing suspect will not be read his Miranda rights because the government is invoking a public safety exception.
Originally posted by AmatuerSkyWatcher
I don't think there is any particular correct precedent for dealing with terrorists. Which historical treatment of terrorists are you alluding to exactly? What makes you think the terrorists are doing what they are doing for political gain? Do you honestly think by ignoring the 'naughty child', they will stop committing acts of terrorism?
Originally posted by AmatuerSkyWatcher
I think what you define as a police state, and what I define as a police are completely different. Perhaps it would be wise for you to compare modern day China with Boston, or perhaps a more stark contrast between Boston and a city from the previous East Germany. When you've made that comparison, and you still feel like Boston is a Police State, please come back and explain.
What? They didn't allow the police "to walk all over" their rights, they chose to not exercise their rights, for the greater good, and to allow the police to perform their duties in a thorough manner, for their (the citizens) benefit. Just because people have rights, doesn't mean they have to exercise them, just because...
Originally posted by muzzleflash
Originally posted by PsykoOps
Originally posted by muzzleflash
The pure simple fact that the Mainstream Media is pushing this so hard, with all caps and bold letters, is giving the terrorists exactly what they want. Maybe the MSM is in cahoots with them ?
Mainstream media isn't pushing this hard. Everyone is. Just look at ATS, twitter, every indie news media out there etc. Everyone is doing it. Cause it's a big story.
How can mainstream media not be pushing it hard if everyone is?
Are they not part of everyone?
I get your point but please speak logically when trying to convey it.
Originally posted by Mykah
What's your logic say now?
Originally posted by M4truth
www.infowars.com...
Governent SHOULD always be the first suspect in case of a terror attack. Here on ATS we should know better, remember 9/11? Anyone with an analictic mind disregards the official story.
Originally posted by Rocker2013
There IS NO EVIDENCE in what you just posted, none at all.
Originally posted by Echtelion
AmateurSkyWatcher is either a cop himself or some idiot laying in his basement, enjoying what's left of privacy before the paramilitaries come to his place with machine guns to rape him and send him to jail.
you need to seriously post a thread of this. it's critical information we all should know, thanks!
Originally posted by Mykah
Hello ATS community.
I was just banned from the David Icke forums by a moderator named Sean who runs the site for sharing medical observations of the Boston incident which I know to be a false flag operation. Not only were my posts deleted, but the posts of several others who quoted me and agreed with my views were also deleted within minutes of being posted. I come here now with the hope of sharing my insights without censorship from corrupted parties. This is the stuff they don't want us to see. Please share this information with everyone you know.
(Warning, some of these pictures are gruesome at first glance. I assure you though that the blood and gore is all fake, I can prove it simply by informed medical observation.)
I've studied and graduated EMT-B certification with the state of Oregon. I've been on calls with heavy arterial bleeds, internal bleeding, fatalities, doa's. I am speaking from direct personal experience with severe trauma.
Here is a telling photograph of the amputee actor. I encourage readers to view the photo side by side with my analysis.
If you loose both your legs from explosive trauma half your blood is gone in one minute via the femoral arteries, youre dead after two. Bleeding out is worse with blunt force trauma (like shrapnel) because flesh is torn rather than cut, exposing more arterial and vascular tissue. The human body holds 5 to 6 LITERS of blood. If that really happened you would see blood EVERYWHERE, the guy would be drenched in it. You would also see what's called arterial spurtting from the injury. Most likely he would vomit after turning ghost white from shock, then turning delirious or passing out. As for the "tourniquet"...
Its not even tied off, its suspended via gravity, which would literally do nothing to an arterial sever. There's no pressure applied. There's no knott with a turn stick for leverage. You can clearly see a gap in the nonexistent wrap job on his left inner thigh (left anterior proximal for you experts) His hands have no blood on them. There's no blood on the ground. The color in his hands and lips shows good circulation.
This is an actor. This is staged. How did they pull it off though? I can show you.
Here in frame six on the left we see the the man with a hood setting up the fake leg wound prosthetics. His attention and hands are right there. The woman is acting as a shield covering what's happening.
Frame 6
Here in frame eight the prosthetics are in place. Amidst all this chaos seconds after the explosion the hooded man takes the time to put on his sunglasses which is a signal.
Frame 8
Here in frame nine with sunglasses now on the hooded man and the woman make eye contact, signal received.
Frame 9
In frame eleven after recieving the go signal the woman makes an open hand gesture the direction both of them are looking, signaling the staged injuries are in place for cameras. The prone amputee raises his left prosthetic injury into the air over the woman's shoulder. No blood is present. The bone is dry, no blood on his leg above the knee, no blood on the woman, no arterial spurt, nothing.
Frame 11
Here in frame fourteen the woman turns her head right but is still holding up that open palm signal with her left hand. The hooded man again busies himself pouring fake blood on the pavement behind the woman. The amputee has both fake injuries in the air now. There is still no blood on his legs, his skin above the injury is clean and dry.
Frame 14
Frame twenty, the fake blood and prosthetics are in place. The amputee gives an open hand gesture along with the woman to bring the cameras in. We're now twenty frames in and still not a drop of fresh blood from a double leg amputation. His legs are dry, the woman is dry and unscathed. Both are making the same hand gesture.
Frame 20
These are actors. This is staged. It was flash powder. There was no crock pot nail bomb. There are no bombers, only patsy. If your looking for a gunman look at the Army in the streets of Boston. Share this knowledge with everyone.edit on 19-4-2013 by Mykah because: formatting