It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by defcon5
Originally posted by thetruthagain
He "ran" at the police..??? With the amount of police/swat etc surrounding them the other brother was able to run off..??? Odd.
There were only about 6 local officers at the scene when that happened.
Originally posted by Ayana
Originally posted by nerbot
Originally posted by Ayana
I am completely stunned by the sheer amount of young males walking round wearing hoodies, caps and backpacks when the whole city is in lockdown with the police looking for someone wearing a hoodie and a cap, who would probably be carrying something to store explosives in... Why?! Just stay in! Nothing is that important.
What about FREEDOMedit on 19/4/2013 by nerbot because: (no reason given)
I'm tellin ya, this freedom lark is a yank thing . I don't value freedom enough to get shot by police or some lunatic just coz I don't wanna stay inside. In fact, I probably would be inside even if I was in the area doing exactly the same thing I am now!
Originally posted by _Del_
Originally posted by JayinAR
CNN reports 15 officers inured last night.
There MUST BE more than two gun men. Military skirmishes just DO NOT WORK with those numbers.
They also said "minor injuries" and that they were released. It wasn't as though 15 officers suffered from gunshot wounds.
(That said, I think this was a cell or part of one. Family looks sketchy)
Originally posted by defcon5
Originally posted by JayinAR
CNN reports 15 officers inured last night.
There MUST BE more than two gun men. Military skirmishes just DO NOT WORK with those numbers.
Watch the footage of the firefight with them throwing IED's at the police and ramming the police barricade. Some of those police could have just had slight injuries, some might have just been hurt in the normal course of doing police work (Climbing fences, roofs, etc).