BREAKING:Explosion At Boston Marathon

reply to post by LadyGreenEyes

I did locate something that stated there were FIVE total, not four, apparently listing the library as a location. Some have stated that they heard news claiming this wasn't an explosion, but I haven't seen anything in print yet. Does anyone have an online source about that?

i do believe i saw a google map with the locations pinned in another thread here.
i'll do my best to find it and get back to ya.

what the status became of them i have no idea but i do remember looking at the map because the 2 library references were quite confusing.

reply to post by JBA2848


That could also be a shoebox or shopping box of some sort carried by the woman.

Originally posted by crazyewok
reply to post by Honor93

 

You need permitts to buy explosives but not the precuser chems. One type of bomb can be made from blonde hair dye and nail vanish remover!

In uk our firework and chem laws are laxer than the usa but cant see you not being able to buy hair dye and nail vanish remover.

i get what you're saying and yes i know that there are plenty of household items that can be utilized.

what threw me for a loop was the 'professional components' mentioned by intrptr, earlier.
i would think those kind of components weren't readily available and less than accessible by most.

I see nothing suspect other than a bag which in my opinion, was not the bomb.

Originally posted by Jobeycool

Originally posted by ManiShuck

Originally posted by SMR

Originally posted by ManiShuck
Here's the image that started that pictures circulation. The poster doesn't even know the difference between Dawn (Hochsprung, the new principal) and Donna (Page, the old/deceased principal).

edit on 16-4-2013 by ManiShuck because: (no reason given)

Neither do you.
Dawn Hochsprung died at Sandy Hook. Donna Page is the new Principal.

edit on 4/16/2013 by SMR because: Stuff

Oh well. Point was, they are two different people and the person who created the image acts as though they are the same.

They almost look identical..Are they twins or something?

I just want to see the video of where the person took that picture, because otherwise it's easily a photoshop. Of course, I may be too brainwashed to believe the government would fake Sandy Hook and then also have a dead lady from said event be at another event honoring the earlier event, where the government is also staging a fake event.

reply to post by SMR


There is CLEARLY a person ( small person) between that woman and the trash can.

Originally posted by Agit8dChop
Maybe someone can help here...

this site:
www.cluesforum.info...
(warning graphic images)

has pages and pages of analysis going on about the photos and footage.. yes some things look odd and out of place but this picture to me, does need someone to debunk.

why are the shadows not uniform?

Definitely looks weird. Here's another image of that shot but maybe a second before:


And another from a screen capture, right after the blast, where all shadows look the same (guy on ground in your picture has just fallen here):

reply to post by Seek_Truth


You mean the old lady in the track suit ?

reply to post by SMR


There is someone in front of her. No?

reply to post by SMR


Sorry guess that's shadow....

Not that I see. I can see her hand on the rail and that's it.
Her track suit appears to be Two-tone color. Light Blue upper sleeve and the rest is Black and then you see her hand on the rail.

Originally posted by LadyGreenEyes

Originally posted by MCSQUARED1
I just thought of something, Probably nothing but here goes

The first explosion happened at 4:9:44 which looks like a weird number to me, and the explosions could of been worse but maybe it was just a warning. There's lots of hype over here in the British media about the upcoming London Marathon and it says there's around 30,000 to attend, Back to the time of the first explosion 4 into 9 as a decimal is .44444 recurring and it happened .44ms and it stuck with me until today and I remember watching some clip on youtube about the rockefeller foundation ' predicting ' 13000 to die in London
anyway 44% of 30,000 is 13,200, maybe 44 is a symbolic number i don't know, as I said its probably nothing but still a thought is sometimes worth putting to paper for the what ifs, I know you can make numbers fit and I'm not a smart guy but just pondering on it made me think, Sorry if I've wasted anyone's time, No bs intended

The first explosion was reported to have gone off somewhere around 2:57pm, Eastern time, not 4-something. Someone else offered something similar, but that time is off a bit.

that time ... 4:9:44 is the race run time (like a game clock)
the race had been underway for 4 hours, 9 minutes and 44 seconds when the bomb exploded at whatever time of day that was, make sense ?

reply to post by SMR


Totally disagree. You can see the tip of the hood between the two. The colors would be the back pack strap and both arms are extended over the fence with palms up.

reply to post by SMR


the bomb here was planted close to the window of the cafe behind this crowd...you can see it if you go through any images of the blast site after most of the victims have been carried off and there are few left on the ground being attended to by EMS and people who are trying to assist...

its a white spot that starts near the cafe window and the ashes from the center of it show it was absorbed by the cafe on the one side and radiated out toward the street on the other...its a greyish white spot that looked like someone dropped a glass jar full of ashes...

later pictures show the same spot with uniformed men and bomb squad in protective EOD armor walking around in front of the store

reply to post by studythem1


I would say it was on the fan side of the guard rail close to the garbage can because of the way the guard rail was bent around the garbage can. The force was strongest near the guard rail.

reply to post by DeepVisions

woah, is there a link for that ?
and, isn't that supposedly the same person who was killed at the SH incident ??

Originally posted by Agit8dChop
Maybe someone can help here...

this site:
www.cluesforum.info...
(warning graphic images)

has pages and pages of analysis going on about the photos and footage.. yes some things look odd and out of place but this picture to me, does need someone to debunk.

why are the shadows not uniform?

Nope no need to debunk. As any self proclaimed artist (ahem) would say to this about any photo taken under a low hanging sun...those shadows are behaving absolutely correctly. What should be questioned is why so many people are taking things like this and making it look like a photoshop conspiracy thing.

Not blaming you...blaming the people who knowingly are screwing with nonsense to get hits, views, clicks and comments. The net is filled with literally hundreds of thousands of images to show this effect in action. In fact, there are entire sites dedicated to rendering shadows or the physics of how they work.

But I'll link this pic instead...cus it has a HORSE IN IT!

People are already making money of Boston's event. And its disturbing. Please link this pic to whatever place you found people trying to "debunk" shadows at this extremely sensitive/serious time.

melwoodrecreation.files.wordpress.com...

reply to post by Seek_Truth

Dude ... your starting to matrix things I think. I do not see anything there other than a Woman and a Mailbox. There are no 'Little People' in-between or otherwise.

reply to post by studythem1

Oh, I totally agree on where these bombs were set off. Maybe you read my post wrong or are just clarifying in general ... I am not in the camp that believes that bag next to the Mailbox is a bomb of any kind.

Anyone post this yet?

Definitely appears to be the right place, and about 2 hours before the blast.

i.imgur.com...

Originally posted by JBA2848

Originally posted by Agit8dChop
Maybe someone can help here...

this site:
www.cluesforum.info...
(warning graphic images)

has pages and pages of analysis going on about the photos and footage.. yes some things look odd and out of place but this picture to me, does need someone to debunk.

why are the shadows not uniform?

Every body knows a woman shadow is different then a mans shadow. The one on the left is a woman.

Just kidding!

I know there is much talk about should women be on the front lines, in combat, etc., but just look at this picture. She is the only one with her weapon drawn already, reacting decisively in one direction (for what reason I don't know). The other [snipped] are looking around trying to figure out what the hell happened. I'd take her on my team anyday.